Enhancing the uptake of systematic reviews of effects: what is the best format for health care managers and policy-makers? A mixed-methods study

BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews are infrequently used by health care managers (HCMs) and policy-makers (PMs) in decision-making. HCMs and PMs co-developed and tested novel systematic review of effects formats to increase their use. METHODS: A three-phased approach was used to evaluate the determinant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marquez, Christine, Johnson, Alekhya Mascarenhas, Jassemi, Sabrina, Park, Jamie, Moore, Julia E., Blaine, Caroline, Bourdon, Gertrude, Chignell, Mark, Ellen, Moriah E., Fortin, Jacques, Graham, Ian D., Hayes, Anne, Hamid, Jemila, Hemmelgarn, Brenda, Hillmer, Michael, Holmes, Bev, Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna, Hubert, Linda, Hutton, Brian, Kastner, Monika, Lavis, John N., Michell, Karen, Moher, David, Ouimet, Mathieu, Perrier, Laure, Proctor, Andrea, Noseworthy, Thomas, Schuckel, Victoria, Stayberg, Sharlene, Tonelli, Marcello, Tricco, Andrea C., Straus, Sharon E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Research
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6014014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29929538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0779-9

Internet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6014014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29929538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0779-9

Ejemplares similares