Cargando…

The trade-off between graduate student research and teaching: A myth?

Many current faculty believe that teaching effort and research success are inversely correlated. This trade-off has rarely been empirically tested; yet, it still impedes efforts to increase the use of evidence-based teaching (EBT), and implement effective teaching training programs for graduate stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shortlidge, Erin E., Eddy, Sarah L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6016899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29940027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199576
_version_ 1783334627269672960
author Shortlidge, Erin E.
Eddy, Sarah L.
author_facet Shortlidge, Erin E.
Eddy, Sarah L.
author_sort Shortlidge, Erin E.
collection PubMed
description Many current faculty believe that teaching effort and research success are inversely correlated. This trade-off has rarely been empirically tested; yet, it still impedes efforts to increase the use of evidence-based teaching (EBT), and implement effective teaching training programs for graduate students, our future faculty. We tested this tradeoff for graduate students using a national sample of life science PhD students. We characterize how increased training in EBT impacts PhD students’ confidence in their preparation for a research career, in communicating their research, and their publication number. PhD students who invested time into EBT did not suffer in confidence in research preparedness, scientific research communication, or in publication number. Instead, overall, the data trend towards a slight synergy between investing in EBT and research preparation. Thus, the tension between developing research and teaching skills may not be salient for today’s graduate students. This work is proof of concept that institutions can incorporate training in EBT into graduate programs without reducing students’ preparedness for a research career. Although some institutions already have graduate teaching programs, increasing these programs at scale, and including training in EBT methods could create a new avenue for accelerating the spread of evidence-based teaching and improved teaching across higher education.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6016899
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60168992018-07-07 The trade-off between graduate student research and teaching: A myth? Shortlidge, Erin E. Eddy, Sarah L. PLoS One Research Article Many current faculty believe that teaching effort and research success are inversely correlated. This trade-off has rarely been empirically tested; yet, it still impedes efforts to increase the use of evidence-based teaching (EBT), and implement effective teaching training programs for graduate students, our future faculty. We tested this tradeoff for graduate students using a national sample of life science PhD students. We characterize how increased training in EBT impacts PhD students’ confidence in their preparation for a research career, in communicating their research, and their publication number. PhD students who invested time into EBT did not suffer in confidence in research preparedness, scientific research communication, or in publication number. Instead, overall, the data trend towards a slight synergy between investing in EBT and research preparation. Thus, the tension between developing research and teaching skills may not be salient for today’s graduate students. This work is proof of concept that institutions can incorporate training in EBT into graduate programs without reducing students’ preparedness for a research career. Although some institutions already have graduate teaching programs, increasing these programs at scale, and including training in EBT methods could create a new avenue for accelerating the spread of evidence-based teaching and improved teaching across higher education. Public Library of Science 2018-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6016899/ /pubmed/29940027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199576 Text en © 2018 Shortlidge, Eddy http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shortlidge, Erin E.
Eddy, Sarah L.
The trade-off between graduate student research and teaching: A myth?
title The trade-off between graduate student research and teaching: A myth?
title_full The trade-off between graduate student research and teaching: A myth?
title_fullStr The trade-off between graduate student research and teaching: A myth?
title_full_unstemmed The trade-off between graduate student research and teaching: A myth?
title_short The trade-off between graduate student research and teaching: A myth?
title_sort trade-off between graduate student research and teaching: a myth?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6016899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29940027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199576
work_keys_str_mv AT shortlidgeerine thetradeoffbetweengraduatestudentresearchandteachingamyth
AT eddysarahl thetradeoffbetweengraduatestudentresearchandteachingamyth
AT shortlidgeerine tradeoffbetweengraduatestudentresearchandteachingamyth
AT eddysarahl tradeoffbetweengraduatestudentresearchandteachingamyth