Cargando…
Comparative study of plasmonic antennas fabricated by electron beam and focused ion beam lithography
We present a comparative study of plasmonic antennas fabricated by electron beam lithography and direct focused ion beam milling. We have investigated optical and structural properties and chemical composition of gold disc-shaped plasmonic antennas on a silicon nitride membrane fabricated by both me...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6018609/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29941880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28037-1 |
_version_ | 1783334989684801536 |
---|---|
author | Horák, Michal Bukvišová, Kristýna Švarc, Vojtěch Jaskowiec, Jiří Křápek, Vlastimil Šikola, Tomáš |
author_facet | Horák, Michal Bukvišová, Kristýna Švarc, Vojtěch Jaskowiec, Jiří Křápek, Vlastimil Šikola, Tomáš |
author_sort | Horák, Michal |
collection | PubMed |
description | We present a comparative study of plasmonic antennas fabricated by electron beam lithography and direct focused ion beam milling. We have investigated optical and structural properties and chemical composition of gold disc-shaped plasmonic antennas on a silicon nitride membrane fabricated by both methods to identify their advantages and disadvantages. Plasmonic antennas were characterized using transmission electron microscopy including electron energy loss spectroscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, and atomic force microscopy. We have found stronger plasmonic response with better field confinement in the antennas fabricated by electron beam lithography, which is attributed to their better structural quality, homogeneous thickness, and only moderate contamination mostly of organic nature. Plasmonic antennas fabricated by focused ion beam lithography feature weaker plasmonic response, lower structural quality with pronounced thickness fluctuations, and strong contamination, both organic and inorganic, including implanted ions from the focused beam. While both techniques are suitable for the fabrication of plasmonic antennas, electron beam lithography shall be prioritized over focused ion beam lithography due to better quality and performance of its products. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6018609 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60186092018-07-06 Comparative study of plasmonic antennas fabricated by electron beam and focused ion beam lithography Horák, Michal Bukvišová, Kristýna Švarc, Vojtěch Jaskowiec, Jiří Křápek, Vlastimil Šikola, Tomáš Sci Rep Article We present a comparative study of plasmonic antennas fabricated by electron beam lithography and direct focused ion beam milling. We have investigated optical and structural properties and chemical composition of gold disc-shaped plasmonic antennas on a silicon nitride membrane fabricated by both methods to identify their advantages and disadvantages. Plasmonic antennas were characterized using transmission electron microscopy including electron energy loss spectroscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, and atomic force microscopy. We have found stronger plasmonic response with better field confinement in the antennas fabricated by electron beam lithography, which is attributed to their better structural quality, homogeneous thickness, and only moderate contamination mostly of organic nature. Plasmonic antennas fabricated by focused ion beam lithography feature weaker plasmonic response, lower structural quality with pronounced thickness fluctuations, and strong contamination, both organic and inorganic, including implanted ions from the focused beam. While both techniques are suitable for the fabrication of plasmonic antennas, electron beam lithography shall be prioritized over focused ion beam lithography due to better quality and performance of its products. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6018609/ /pubmed/29941880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28037-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Horák, Michal Bukvišová, Kristýna Švarc, Vojtěch Jaskowiec, Jiří Křápek, Vlastimil Šikola, Tomáš Comparative study of plasmonic antennas fabricated by electron beam and focused ion beam lithography |
title | Comparative study of plasmonic antennas fabricated by electron beam and focused ion beam lithography |
title_full | Comparative study of plasmonic antennas fabricated by electron beam and focused ion beam lithography |
title_fullStr | Comparative study of plasmonic antennas fabricated by electron beam and focused ion beam lithography |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative study of plasmonic antennas fabricated by electron beam and focused ion beam lithography |
title_short | Comparative study of plasmonic antennas fabricated by electron beam and focused ion beam lithography |
title_sort | comparative study of plasmonic antennas fabricated by electron beam and focused ion beam lithography |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6018609/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29941880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28037-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT horakmichal comparativestudyofplasmonicantennasfabricatedbyelectronbeamandfocusedionbeamlithography AT bukvisovakristyna comparativestudyofplasmonicantennasfabricatedbyelectronbeamandfocusedionbeamlithography AT svarcvojtech comparativestudyofplasmonicantennasfabricatedbyelectronbeamandfocusedionbeamlithography AT jaskowiecjiri comparativestudyofplasmonicantennasfabricatedbyelectronbeamandfocusedionbeamlithography AT krapekvlastimil comparativestudyofplasmonicantennasfabricatedbyelectronbeamandfocusedionbeamlithography AT sikolatomas comparativestudyofplasmonicantennasfabricatedbyelectronbeamandfocusedionbeamlithography |