Cargando…

Methodological quality of teaching communication skills to undergraduate medical students: a mapping review

BACKGROUND: Patient-clinician communication training is a core component of the undergraduate medical program. As with all areas of medicine, the best available evidence for teaching these skills should be incorporated into training programs. Examining the volume, type and design-quality of publicat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sanson-Fisher, Rob, Hobden, Breanne, Waller, Amy, Dodd, Natalie, Boyd, Lucy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6020352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29945587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1265-4
_version_ 1783335278345191424
author Sanson-Fisher, Rob
Hobden, Breanne
Waller, Amy
Dodd, Natalie
Boyd, Lucy
author_facet Sanson-Fisher, Rob
Hobden, Breanne
Waller, Amy
Dodd, Natalie
Boyd, Lucy
author_sort Sanson-Fisher, Rob
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient-clinician communication training is a core component of the undergraduate medical program. As with all areas of medicine, the best available evidence for teaching these skills should be incorporated into training programs. Examining the volume, type and design-quality of publications in this field can help to determine whether research is following a natural scientific progression to inform interactional skills training. This study aimed to review: (i) whether the proportion of publications examining teaching interactional skills to undergraduate medical students by study type, across three time-periods (2007–2008, 2011–2012, 2015–2016), changed over time (i.e. measurement, descriptive or interventions studies); and (ii) the proportion of intervention studies meeting Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) research design criteria. METHODS: Medline, PubMed, PsycInfo and the Cochrane Database were searched for studies published in English from 2007 to 2016. Title and abstract reviews were performed for the included years. Articles were examined against the inclusion/exclusion criteria and those included were coded into descriptive, measurement or intervention categories. RESULTS: A total of 243 relevant publications were identified. Fifty-two were published from 2007 to 2008, 75 from 2011 to 2012 and 116 from 2015 to 2016. Most identified studies were descriptive (63%), followed by measurement studies (22%) and intervention studies (15%). The proportion of descriptive studies increased significantly over time. However, the proportion of intervention studies did not change and the proportion of measures studies significantly decreased. Of the 37 intervention studies identified within the three time-periods, only 16 (43%) met EPOC study design criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The largest proportion of identified studies were descriptive, however, descriptive research is not sufficient to ensure communication skills training can effectively improve interactions between clinicians and patients. A more rigorous approach to research in this area is needed to inform education strategies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-018-1265-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6020352
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60203522018-07-06 Methodological quality of teaching communication skills to undergraduate medical students: a mapping review Sanson-Fisher, Rob Hobden, Breanne Waller, Amy Dodd, Natalie Boyd, Lucy BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Patient-clinician communication training is a core component of the undergraduate medical program. As with all areas of medicine, the best available evidence for teaching these skills should be incorporated into training programs. Examining the volume, type and design-quality of publications in this field can help to determine whether research is following a natural scientific progression to inform interactional skills training. This study aimed to review: (i) whether the proportion of publications examining teaching interactional skills to undergraduate medical students by study type, across three time-periods (2007–2008, 2011–2012, 2015–2016), changed over time (i.e. measurement, descriptive or interventions studies); and (ii) the proportion of intervention studies meeting Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) research design criteria. METHODS: Medline, PubMed, PsycInfo and the Cochrane Database were searched for studies published in English from 2007 to 2016. Title and abstract reviews were performed for the included years. Articles were examined against the inclusion/exclusion criteria and those included were coded into descriptive, measurement or intervention categories. RESULTS: A total of 243 relevant publications were identified. Fifty-two were published from 2007 to 2008, 75 from 2011 to 2012 and 116 from 2015 to 2016. Most identified studies were descriptive (63%), followed by measurement studies (22%) and intervention studies (15%). The proportion of descriptive studies increased significantly over time. However, the proportion of intervention studies did not change and the proportion of measures studies significantly decreased. Of the 37 intervention studies identified within the three time-periods, only 16 (43%) met EPOC study design criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The largest proportion of identified studies were descriptive, however, descriptive research is not sufficient to ensure communication skills training can effectively improve interactions between clinicians and patients. A more rigorous approach to research in this area is needed to inform education strategies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-018-1265-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6020352/ /pubmed/29945587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1265-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sanson-Fisher, Rob
Hobden, Breanne
Waller, Amy
Dodd, Natalie
Boyd, Lucy
Methodological quality of teaching communication skills to undergraduate medical students: a mapping review
title Methodological quality of teaching communication skills to undergraduate medical students: a mapping review
title_full Methodological quality of teaching communication skills to undergraduate medical students: a mapping review
title_fullStr Methodological quality of teaching communication skills to undergraduate medical students: a mapping review
title_full_unstemmed Methodological quality of teaching communication skills to undergraduate medical students: a mapping review
title_short Methodological quality of teaching communication skills to undergraduate medical students: a mapping review
title_sort methodological quality of teaching communication skills to undergraduate medical students: a mapping review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6020352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29945587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1265-4
work_keys_str_mv AT sansonfisherrob methodologicalqualityofteachingcommunicationskillstoundergraduatemedicalstudentsamappingreview
AT hobdenbreanne methodologicalqualityofteachingcommunicationskillstoundergraduatemedicalstudentsamappingreview
AT walleramy methodologicalqualityofteachingcommunicationskillstoundergraduatemedicalstudentsamappingreview
AT doddnatalie methodologicalqualityofteachingcommunicationskillstoundergraduatemedicalstudentsamappingreview
AT boydlucy methodologicalqualityofteachingcommunicationskillstoundergraduatemedicalstudentsamappingreview