Cargando…

Satellite Launcher Navigation with One Versus Three IMUs: Sensor Positioning and Data Fusion Model Analysis

Using multiple IMUs allows both their distribution along vehicle structures and a reliance on integration methods, which is not possible with a single IMU. This paper addresses the issue of relying on three IMUs instead of only one of a higher quality in the context of a satellite launcher. The impa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beaudoin, Yanick, Desbiens, André, Gagnon, Eric, Landry, René
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6022019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29880776
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18061872
_version_ 1783335586369634304
author Beaudoin, Yanick
Desbiens, André
Gagnon, Eric
Landry, René
author_facet Beaudoin, Yanick
Desbiens, André
Gagnon, Eric
Landry, René
author_sort Beaudoin, Yanick
collection PubMed
description Using multiple IMUs allows both their distribution along vehicle structures and a reliance on integration methods, which is not possible with a single IMU. This paper addresses the issue of relying on three IMUs instead of only one of a higher quality in the context of a satellite launcher. The impact of the IMU positions was tested by comparing collocated IMUs against IMUs installed in the head of each launcher stage. For multi-IMU configurations, three integration methods were tested: all IMUs fused in a single INS, multiple INSs fused in a stacked filter, and multiple INSs fused in a stacked filter with geometrical constraints. All navigation solutions were aided by a three-axis attitude reference sensor and were tested with and without a GPS receiver. The results show that distributing IMUs along the launcher structure does not improve navigation performances compared to having them collocated. The fusion of multiple IMUs in one INS provides equivalent results as one IMU. However, fusing multiple INSs greatly reduces estimation errors. Performances are further improved with the addition of geometrical constraints. During long GPS outages, relative velocity and position constraints should not be exploited, as they may lead to filter divergence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6022019
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60220192018-07-02 Satellite Launcher Navigation with One Versus Three IMUs: Sensor Positioning and Data Fusion Model Analysis Beaudoin, Yanick Desbiens, André Gagnon, Eric Landry, René Sensors (Basel) Article Using multiple IMUs allows both their distribution along vehicle structures and a reliance on integration methods, which is not possible with a single IMU. This paper addresses the issue of relying on three IMUs instead of only one of a higher quality in the context of a satellite launcher. The impact of the IMU positions was tested by comparing collocated IMUs against IMUs installed in the head of each launcher stage. For multi-IMU configurations, three integration methods were tested: all IMUs fused in a single INS, multiple INSs fused in a stacked filter, and multiple INSs fused in a stacked filter with geometrical constraints. All navigation solutions were aided by a three-axis attitude reference sensor and were tested with and without a GPS receiver. The results show that distributing IMUs along the launcher structure does not improve navigation performances compared to having them collocated. The fusion of multiple IMUs in one INS provides equivalent results as one IMU. However, fusing multiple INSs greatly reduces estimation errors. Performances are further improved with the addition of geometrical constraints. During long GPS outages, relative velocity and position constraints should not be exploited, as they may lead to filter divergence. MDPI 2018-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6022019/ /pubmed/29880776 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18061872 Text en © 2018 by Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, Department of National Defence. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Beaudoin, Yanick
Desbiens, André
Gagnon, Eric
Landry, René
Satellite Launcher Navigation with One Versus Three IMUs: Sensor Positioning and Data Fusion Model Analysis
title Satellite Launcher Navigation with One Versus Three IMUs: Sensor Positioning and Data Fusion Model Analysis
title_full Satellite Launcher Navigation with One Versus Three IMUs: Sensor Positioning and Data Fusion Model Analysis
title_fullStr Satellite Launcher Navigation with One Versus Three IMUs: Sensor Positioning and Data Fusion Model Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Satellite Launcher Navigation with One Versus Three IMUs: Sensor Positioning and Data Fusion Model Analysis
title_short Satellite Launcher Navigation with One Versus Three IMUs: Sensor Positioning and Data Fusion Model Analysis
title_sort satellite launcher navigation with one versus three imus: sensor positioning and data fusion model analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6022019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29880776
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18061872
work_keys_str_mv AT beaudoinyanick satellitelaunchernavigationwithoneversusthreeimussensorpositioninganddatafusionmodelanalysis
AT desbiensandre satellitelaunchernavigationwithoneversusthreeimussensorpositioninganddatafusionmodelanalysis
AT gagnoneric satellitelaunchernavigationwithoneversusthreeimussensorpositioninganddatafusionmodelanalysis
AT landryrene satellitelaunchernavigationwithoneversusthreeimussensorpositioninganddatafusionmodelanalysis