Cargando…

Comparison of village dog and wolf genomes highlights the role of the neural crest in dog domestication

BACKGROUND: Domesticated from gray wolves between 10 and 40 kya in Eurasia, dogs display a vast array of phenotypes that differ from their ancestors, yet mirror other domesticated animal species, a phenomenon known as the domestication syndrome. Here, we use signatures persisting in dog genomes to i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pendleton, Amanda L., Shen, Feichen, Taravella, Angela M., Emery, Sarah, Veeramah, Krishna R., Boyko, Adam R., Kidd, Jeffrey M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6022502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29950181
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-018-0535-2
_version_ 1783335691462115328
author Pendleton, Amanda L.
Shen, Feichen
Taravella, Angela M.
Emery, Sarah
Veeramah, Krishna R.
Boyko, Adam R.
Kidd, Jeffrey M.
author_facet Pendleton, Amanda L.
Shen, Feichen
Taravella, Angela M.
Emery, Sarah
Veeramah, Krishna R.
Boyko, Adam R.
Kidd, Jeffrey M.
author_sort Pendleton, Amanda L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Domesticated from gray wolves between 10 and 40 kya in Eurasia, dogs display a vast array of phenotypes that differ from their ancestors, yet mirror other domesticated animal species, a phenomenon known as the domestication syndrome. Here, we use signatures persisting in dog genomes to identify genes and pathways possibly altered by the selective pressures of domestication. RESULTS: Whole-genome SNP analyses of 43 globally distributed village dogs and 10 wolves differentiated signatures resulting from domestication rather than breed formation. We identified 246 candidate domestication regions containing 10.8 Mb of genome sequence and 429 genes. The regions share haplotypes with ancient dogs, suggesting that the detected signals are not the result of recent selection. Gene enrichments highlight numerous genes linked to neural crest and central nervous system development as well as neurological function. Read depth analysis suggests that copy number variation played a minor role in dog domestication. CONCLUSIONS: Our results identify genes that act early in embryogenesis and can confer phenotypes distinguishing domesticated dogs from wolves, such as tameness, smaller jaws, floppy ears, and diminished craniofacial development as the targets of selection during domestication. These differences reflect the phenotypes of the domestication syndrome, which can be explained by alterations in the migration or activity of neural crest cells during development. We propose that initial selection during early dog domestication was for behavior, a trait influenced by genes which act in the neural crest, which secondarily gave rise to the phenotypes of modern dogs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12915-018-0535-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6022502
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60225022018-07-09 Comparison of village dog and wolf genomes highlights the role of the neural crest in dog domestication Pendleton, Amanda L. Shen, Feichen Taravella, Angela M. Emery, Sarah Veeramah, Krishna R. Boyko, Adam R. Kidd, Jeffrey M. BMC Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Domesticated from gray wolves between 10 and 40 kya in Eurasia, dogs display a vast array of phenotypes that differ from their ancestors, yet mirror other domesticated animal species, a phenomenon known as the domestication syndrome. Here, we use signatures persisting in dog genomes to identify genes and pathways possibly altered by the selective pressures of domestication. RESULTS: Whole-genome SNP analyses of 43 globally distributed village dogs and 10 wolves differentiated signatures resulting from domestication rather than breed formation. We identified 246 candidate domestication regions containing 10.8 Mb of genome sequence and 429 genes. The regions share haplotypes with ancient dogs, suggesting that the detected signals are not the result of recent selection. Gene enrichments highlight numerous genes linked to neural crest and central nervous system development as well as neurological function. Read depth analysis suggests that copy number variation played a minor role in dog domestication. CONCLUSIONS: Our results identify genes that act early in embryogenesis and can confer phenotypes distinguishing domesticated dogs from wolves, such as tameness, smaller jaws, floppy ears, and diminished craniofacial development as the targets of selection during domestication. These differences reflect the phenotypes of the domestication syndrome, which can be explained by alterations in the migration or activity of neural crest cells during development. We propose that initial selection during early dog domestication was for behavior, a trait influenced by genes which act in the neural crest, which secondarily gave rise to the phenotypes of modern dogs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12915-018-0535-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6022502/ /pubmed/29950181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-018-0535-2 Text en © Kidd et al. 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pendleton, Amanda L.
Shen, Feichen
Taravella, Angela M.
Emery, Sarah
Veeramah, Krishna R.
Boyko, Adam R.
Kidd, Jeffrey M.
Comparison of village dog and wolf genomes highlights the role of the neural crest in dog domestication
title Comparison of village dog and wolf genomes highlights the role of the neural crest in dog domestication
title_full Comparison of village dog and wolf genomes highlights the role of the neural crest in dog domestication
title_fullStr Comparison of village dog and wolf genomes highlights the role of the neural crest in dog domestication
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of village dog and wolf genomes highlights the role of the neural crest in dog domestication
title_short Comparison of village dog and wolf genomes highlights the role of the neural crest in dog domestication
title_sort comparison of village dog and wolf genomes highlights the role of the neural crest in dog domestication
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6022502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29950181
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-018-0535-2
work_keys_str_mv AT pendletonamandal comparisonofvillagedogandwolfgenomeshighlightstheroleoftheneuralcrestindogdomestication
AT shenfeichen comparisonofvillagedogandwolfgenomeshighlightstheroleoftheneuralcrestindogdomestication
AT taravellaangelam comparisonofvillagedogandwolfgenomeshighlightstheroleoftheneuralcrestindogdomestication
AT emerysarah comparisonofvillagedogandwolfgenomeshighlightstheroleoftheneuralcrestindogdomestication
AT veeramahkrishnar comparisonofvillagedogandwolfgenomeshighlightstheroleoftheneuralcrestindogdomestication
AT boykoadamr comparisonofvillagedogandwolfgenomeshighlightstheroleoftheneuralcrestindogdomestication
AT kiddjeffreym comparisonofvillagedogandwolfgenomeshighlightstheroleoftheneuralcrestindogdomestication