Cargando…

Benchmarking differential expression analysis tools for RNA-Seq: normalization-based vs. log-ratio transformation-based methods

BACKGROUND: Count data generated by next-generation sequencing assays do not measure absolute transcript abundances. Instead, the data are constrained to an arbitrary “library size” by the sequencing depth of the assay, and typically must be normalized prior to statistical analysis. The constrained...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Quinn, Thomas P., Crowley, Tamsyn M., Richardson, Mark F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6052553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30021534
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2261-8
_version_ 1783340678057558016
author Quinn, Thomas P.
Crowley, Tamsyn M.
Richardson, Mark F.
author_facet Quinn, Thomas P.
Crowley, Tamsyn M.
Richardson, Mark F.
author_sort Quinn, Thomas P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Count data generated by next-generation sequencing assays do not measure absolute transcript abundances. Instead, the data are constrained to an arbitrary “library size” by the sequencing depth of the assay, and typically must be normalized prior to statistical analysis. The constrained nature of these data means one could alternatively use a log-ratio transformation in lieu of normalization, as often done when testing for differential abundance (DA) of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) in 16S rRNA data. Therefore, we benchmark how well the ALDEx2 package, a transformation-based DA tool, detects differential expression in high-throughput RNA-sequencing data (RNA-Seq), compared to conventional RNA-Seq methods such as edgeR and DESeq2. RESULTS: To evaluate the performance of log-ratio transformation-based tools, we apply the ALDEx2 package to two simulated, and two real, RNA-Seq data sets. One of the latter was previously used to benchmark dozens of conventional RNA-Seq differential expression methods, enabling us to directly compare transformation-based approaches. We show that ALDEx2, widely used in meta-genomics research, identifies differentially expressed genes (and transcripts) from RNA-Seq data with high precision and, given sufficient sample sizes, high recall too (regardless of the alignment and quantification procedure used). Although we show that the choice in log-ratio transformation can affect performance, ALDEx2 has high precision (i.e., few false positives) across all transformations. Finally, we present a novel, iterative log-ratio transformation (now implemented in ALDEx2) that further improves performance in simulations. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that log-ratio transformation-based methods can work to measure differential expression from RNA-Seq data, provided that certain assumptions are met. Moreover, these methods have very high precision (i.e., few false positives) in simulations and perform well on real data too. With previously demonstrated applicability to 16S rRNA data, ALDEx2 can thus serve as a single tool for data from multiple sequencing modalities. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12859-018-2261-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6052553
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60525532018-07-20 Benchmarking differential expression analysis tools for RNA-Seq: normalization-based vs. log-ratio transformation-based methods Quinn, Thomas P. Crowley, Tamsyn M. Richardson, Mark F. BMC Bioinformatics Research Article BACKGROUND: Count data generated by next-generation sequencing assays do not measure absolute transcript abundances. Instead, the data are constrained to an arbitrary “library size” by the sequencing depth of the assay, and typically must be normalized prior to statistical analysis. The constrained nature of these data means one could alternatively use a log-ratio transformation in lieu of normalization, as often done when testing for differential abundance (DA) of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) in 16S rRNA data. Therefore, we benchmark how well the ALDEx2 package, a transformation-based DA tool, detects differential expression in high-throughput RNA-sequencing data (RNA-Seq), compared to conventional RNA-Seq methods such as edgeR and DESeq2. RESULTS: To evaluate the performance of log-ratio transformation-based tools, we apply the ALDEx2 package to two simulated, and two real, RNA-Seq data sets. One of the latter was previously used to benchmark dozens of conventional RNA-Seq differential expression methods, enabling us to directly compare transformation-based approaches. We show that ALDEx2, widely used in meta-genomics research, identifies differentially expressed genes (and transcripts) from RNA-Seq data with high precision and, given sufficient sample sizes, high recall too (regardless of the alignment and quantification procedure used). Although we show that the choice in log-ratio transformation can affect performance, ALDEx2 has high precision (i.e., few false positives) across all transformations. Finally, we present a novel, iterative log-ratio transformation (now implemented in ALDEx2) that further improves performance in simulations. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that log-ratio transformation-based methods can work to measure differential expression from RNA-Seq data, provided that certain assumptions are met. Moreover, these methods have very high precision (i.e., few false positives) in simulations and perform well on real data too. With previously demonstrated applicability to 16S rRNA data, ALDEx2 can thus serve as a single tool for data from multiple sequencing modalities. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12859-018-2261-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6052553/ /pubmed/30021534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2261-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Quinn, Thomas P.
Crowley, Tamsyn M.
Richardson, Mark F.
Benchmarking differential expression analysis tools for RNA-Seq: normalization-based vs. log-ratio transformation-based methods
title Benchmarking differential expression analysis tools for RNA-Seq: normalization-based vs. log-ratio transformation-based methods
title_full Benchmarking differential expression analysis tools for RNA-Seq: normalization-based vs. log-ratio transformation-based methods
title_fullStr Benchmarking differential expression analysis tools for RNA-Seq: normalization-based vs. log-ratio transformation-based methods
title_full_unstemmed Benchmarking differential expression analysis tools for RNA-Seq: normalization-based vs. log-ratio transformation-based methods
title_short Benchmarking differential expression analysis tools for RNA-Seq: normalization-based vs. log-ratio transformation-based methods
title_sort benchmarking differential expression analysis tools for rna-seq: normalization-based vs. log-ratio transformation-based methods
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6052553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30021534
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2261-8
work_keys_str_mv AT quinnthomasp benchmarkingdifferentialexpressionanalysistoolsforrnaseqnormalizationbasedvslogratiotransformationbasedmethods
AT crowleytamsynm benchmarkingdifferentialexpressionanalysistoolsforrnaseqnormalizationbasedvslogratiotransformationbasedmethods
AT richardsonmarkf benchmarkingdifferentialexpressionanalysistoolsforrnaseqnormalizationbasedvslogratiotransformationbasedmethods