Cargando…
Differential gene expression analysis tools exhibit substandard performance for long non-coding RNA-sequencing data
BACKGROUND: Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are typically expressed at low levels and are inherently highly variable. This is a fundamental challenge for differential expression (DE) analysis. In this study, the performance of 25 pipelines for testing DE in RNA-seq data is comprehensively evaluated,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6058388/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30041657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-018-1466-5 |
_version_ | 1783341683994263552 |
---|---|
author | Assefa, Alemu Takele De Paepe, Katrijn Everaert, Celine Mestdagh, Pieter Thas, Olivier Vandesompele, Jo |
author_facet | Assefa, Alemu Takele De Paepe, Katrijn Everaert, Celine Mestdagh, Pieter Thas, Olivier Vandesompele, Jo |
author_sort | Assefa, Alemu Takele |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are typically expressed at low levels and are inherently highly variable. This is a fundamental challenge for differential expression (DE) analysis. In this study, the performance of 25 pipelines for testing DE in RNA-seq data is comprehensively evaluated, with a particular focus on lncRNAs and low-abundance mRNAs. Fifteen performance metrics are used to evaluate DE tools and normalization methods using simulations and analyses of six diverse RNA-seq datasets. RESULTS: Gene expression data are simulated using non-parametric procedures in such a way that realistic levels of expression and variability are preserved in the simulated data. Throughout the assessment, results for mRNA and lncRNA were tracked separately. All the pipelines exhibit inferior performance for lncRNAs compared to mRNAs across all simulated scenarios and benchmark RNA-seq datasets. The substandard performance of DE tools for lncRNAs applies also to low-abundance mRNAs. No single tool uniformly outperformed the others. Variability, number of samples, and fraction of DE genes markedly influenced DE tool performance. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, linear modeling with empirical Bayes moderation (limma) and a non-parametric approach (SAMSeq) showed good control of the false discovery rate and reasonable sensitivity. Of note, for achieving a sensitivity of at least 50%, more than 80 samples are required when studying expression levels in realistic settings such as in clinical cancer research. About half of the methods showed a substantial excess of false discoveries, making these methods unreliable for DE analysis and jeopardizing reproducible science. The detailed results of our study can be consulted through a user-friendly web application, giving guidance on selection of the optimal DE tool (http://statapps.ugent.be/tools/AppDGE/). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13059-018-1466-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6058388 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60583882018-07-30 Differential gene expression analysis tools exhibit substandard performance for long non-coding RNA-sequencing data Assefa, Alemu Takele De Paepe, Katrijn Everaert, Celine Mestdagh, Pieter Thas, Olivier Vandesompele, Jo Genome Biol Research BACKGROUND: Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are typically expressed at low levels and are inherently highly variable. This is a fundamental challenge for differential expression (DE) analysis. In this study, the performance of 25 pipelines for testing DE in RNA-seq data is comprehensively evaluated, with a particular focus on lncRNAs and low-abundance mRNAs. Fifteen performance metrics are used to evaluate DE tools and normalization methods using simulations and analyses of six diverse RNA-seq datasets. RESULTS: Gene expression data are simulated using non-parametric procedures in such a way that realistic levels of expression and variability are preserved in the simulated data. Throughout the assessment, results for mRNA and lncRNA were tracked separately. All the pipelines exhibit inferior performance for lncRNAs compared to mRNAs across all simulated scenarios and benchmark RNA-seq datasets. The substandard performance of DE tools for lncRNAs applies also to low-abundance mRNAs. No single tool uniformly outperformed the others. Variability, number of samples, and fraction of DE genes markedly influenced DE tool performance. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, linear modeling with empirical Bayes moderation (limma) and a non-parametric approach (SAMSeq) showed good control of the false discovery rate and reasonable sensitivity. Of note, for achieving a sensitivity of at least 50%, more than 80 samples are required when studying expression levels in realistic settings such as in clinical cancer research. About half of the methods showed a substantial excess of false discoveries, making these methods unreliable for DE analysis and jeopardizing reproducible science. The detailed results of our study can be consulted through a user-friendly web application, giving guidance on selection of the optimal DE tool (http://statapps.ugent.be/tools/AppDGE/). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13059-018-1466-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6058388/ /pubmed/30041657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-018-1466-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Assefa, Alemu Takele De Paepe, Katrijn Everaert, Celine Mestdagh, Pieter Thas, Olivier Vandesompele, Jo Differential gene expression analysis tools exhibit substandard performance for long non-coding RNA-sequencing data |
title | Differential gene expression analysis tools exhibit substandard performance for long non-coding RNA-sequencing data |
title_full | Differential gene expression analysis tools exhibit substandard performance for long non-coding RNA-sequencing data |
title_fullStr | Differential gene expression analysis tools exhibit substandard performance for long non-coding RNA-sequencing data |
title_full_unstemmed | Differential gene expression analysis tools exhibit substandard performance for long non-coding RNA-sequencing data |
title_short | Differential gene expression analysis tools exhibit substandard performance for long non-coding RNA-sequencing data |
title_sort | differential gene expression analysis tools exhibit substandard performance for long non-coding rna-sequencing data |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6058388/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30041657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-018-1466-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT assefaalemutakele differentialgeneexpressionanalysistoolsexhibitsubstandardperformanceforlongnoncodingrnasequencingdata AT depaepekatrijn differentialgeneexpressionanalysistoolsexhibitsubstandardperformanceforlongnoncodingrnasequencingdata AT everaertceline differentialgeneexpressionanalysistoolsexhibitsubstandardperformanceforlongnoncodingrnasequencingdata AT mestdaghpieter differentialgeneexpressionanalysistoolsexhibitsubstandardperformanceforlongnoncodingrnasequencingdata AT thasolivier differentialgeneexpressionanalysistoolsexhibitsubstandardperformanceforlongnoncodingrnasequencingdata AT vandesompelejo differentialgeneexpressionanalysistoolsexhibitsubstandardperformanceforlongnoncodingrnasequencingdata |