A randomised investigation of journal responses to academic and journalist enquiry about possible scientific misconduct

OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether responses about possible scientific misconduct from journals to journalists would differ in speed, usefulness, and tone from responses to academics. Twelve journals that published 23 clinical trials about which concerns had been previously raised were randomly assi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bolland, Mark J., Avenell, Alison, Gamble, Greg D., Buranyi, Stephen, Grey, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Research Note
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6065063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30060762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3613-1

Internet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6065063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30060762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3613-1

Ejemplares similares