Cargando…
A randomised investigation of journal responses to academic and journalist enquiry about possible scientific misconduct
OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether responses about possible scientific misconduct from journals to journalists would differ in speed, usefulness, and tone from responses to academics. Twelve journals that published 23 clinical trials about which concerns had been previously raised were randomly assi...
Autores principales: | Bolland, Mark J., Avenell, Alison, Gamble, Greg D., Buranyi, Stephen, Grey, Andrew |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6065063/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30060762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3613-1 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Quality of reports of investigations of research integrity by academic institutions
por: Grey, Andrew, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
An investigation into the impact and implications of published papers from retracted research: systematic search of affected literature
por: Avenell, Alison, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Calcium supplements with or without vitamin D and risk of cardiovascular events: reanalysis of the Women’s Health Initiative limited access dataset and meta-analysis
por: Bolland, Mark J, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Media Coverage, Journal Press Releases and Editorials Associated with Randomized and Observational Studies in High-Impact Medical Journals: A Cohort Study
por: Wang, Michael T. M., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Updates to Policies and Procedures Related to Potential Scientific and Academic Misconduct in the Journals of the American Diabetes Association
por: Kohler, Christian S.
Publicado: (2012)