Cargando…
How do physicians behave when they participate in audit and feedback activities in a group with their peers?
BACKGROUND: Audit and feedback interventions may be strengthened using social interaction. With this in mind, the Calgary office of the Alberta Physician Learning Program developed a process for audit and group feedback for physician groups. As a part of a larger project to develop a practical appro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6069557/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30064509 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0796-8 |
_version_ | 1783343520867680256 |
---|---|
author | Cooke, Lara J. Duncan, Diane Rivera, Laura Dowling, Shawn K. Symonds, Christopher Armson, Heather |
author_facet | Cooke, Lara J. Duncan, Diane Rivera, Laura Dowling, Shawn K. Symonds, Christopher Armson, Heather |
author_sort | Cooke, Lara J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Audit and feedback interventions may be strengthened using social interaction. With this in mind, the Calgary office of the Alberta Physician Learning Program developed a process for audit and group feedback for physician groups. As a part of a larger project to develop a practical approach to the design and implementation of audit and group feedback projects, we explored patterns of physician behavior during facilitated audit and group feedback sessions. METHODS: Six audit and group feedback sessions were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed thematically to derive a conceptual model of physicians’ behaviors during audit and group feedback sessions. RESULTS: A predictable cycle of behaviors emerged from audit and group feedback sessions. This cycle would repeat with discussion of each new data element: reacting to the data, questioning and understanding the data, justifying and contextualizing, sharing and reflecting on the data and relevant guidelines, and planning for change. “Change cues” that emerged within groups reliably pivoted the discussion towards action planning. CONCLUSIONS: In audit and group feedback sessions, physicians display a predictable series of behaviors as they move towards commitment to change. Establishing the meaning and credibility of the data is a necessary precursor to reflection. Group reflection leads to “change cues” triggered by group members, which stimulate action planning. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6069557 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60695572018-08-03 How do physicians behave when they participate in audit and feedback activities in a group with their peers? Cooke, Lara J. Duncan, Diane Rivera, Laura Dowling, Shawn K. Symonds, Christopher Armson, Heather Implement Sci Research BACKGROUND: Audit and feedback interventions may be strengthened using social interaction. With this in mind, the Calgary office of the Alberta Physician Learning Program developed a process for audit and group feedback for physician groups. As a part of a larger project to develop a practical approach to the design and implementation of audit and group feedback projects, we explored patterns of physician behavior during facilitated audit and group feedback sessions. METHODS: Six audit and group feedback sessions were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed thematically to derive a conceptual model of physicians’ behaviors during audit and group feedback sessions. RESULTS: A predictable cycle of behaviors emerged from audit and group feedback sessions. This cycle would repeat with discussion of each new data element: reacting to the data, questioning and understanding the data, justifying and contextualizing, sharing and reflecting on the data and relevant guidelines, and planning for change. “Change cues” that emerged within groups reliably pivoted the discussion towards action planning. CONCLUSIONS: In audit and group feedback sessions, physicians display a predictable series of behaviors as they move towards commitment to change. Establishing the meaning and credibility of the data is a necessary precursor to reflection. Group reflection leads to “change cues” triggered by group members, which stimulate action planning. BioMed Central 2018-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6069557/ /pubmed/30064509 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0796-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Cooke, Lara J. Duncan, Diane Rivera, Laura Dowling, Shawn K. Symonds, Christopher Armson, Heather How do physicians behave when they participate in audit and feedback activities in a group with their peers? |
title | How do physicians behave when they participate in audit and feedback activities in a group with their peers? |
title_full | How do physicians behave when they participate in audit and feedback activities in a group with their peers? |
title_fullStr | How do physicians behave when they participate in audit and feedback activities in a group with their peers? |
title_full_unstemmed | How do physicians behave when they participate in audit and feedback activities in a group with their peers? |
title_short | How do physicians behave when they participate in audit and feedback activities in a group with their peers? |
title_sort | how do physicians behave when they participate in audit and feedback activities in a group with their peers? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6069557/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30064509 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0796-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cookelaraj howdophysiciansbehavewhentheyparticipateinauditandfeedbackactivitiesinagroupwiththeirpeers AT duncandiane howdophysiciansbehavewhentheyparticipateinauditandfeedbackactivitiesinagroupwiththeirpeers AT riveralaura howdophysiciansbehavewhentheyparticipateinauditandfeedbackactivitiesinagroupwiththeirpeers AT dowlingshawnk howdophysiciansbehavewhentheyparticipateinauditandfeedbackactivitiesinagroupwiththeirpeers AT symondschristopher howdophysiciansbehavewhentheyparticipateinauditandfeedbackactivitiesinagroupwiththeirpeers AT armsonheather howdophysiciansbehavewhentheyparticipateinauditandfeedbackactivitiesinagroupwiththeirpeers |