Cargando…

Importance of clinical educators to research use and suggestions for better efficiency and effectiveness: results of a cross-sectional survey of care aides in Canadian long-term care facilities

OBJECTIVE: This study explored the effect of clinical educators as facilitators of research use and how it may be modified by organisational context in the settings. DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study. SETTING: A representative sample of 91 residential long-term care (LTC) facilities across...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lo, T K T, Hoben, Matthias, Norton, Peter G, Teare, Gary F, Estabrooks, Carole A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6082467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30007925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020074
_version_ 1783345801499508736
author Lo, T K T
Hoben, Matthias
Norton, Peter G
Teare, Gary F
Estabrooks, Carole A
author_facet Lo, T K T
Hoben, Matthias
Norton, Peter G
Teare, Gary F
Estabrooks, Carole A
author_sort Lo, T K T
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study explored the effect of clinical educators as facilitators of research use and how it may be modified by organisational context in the settings. DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study. SETTING: A representative sample of 91 residential long-term care (LTC) facilities across Western Canada. PARTICIPANTS: We used surveys to collect data from the frontline care aides and information about the organisational context of the care units. OUTCOME MEASURE AND EXPLANATORY VARIABLES: We assessed research use (the outcome) with the Conceptual Research Utilization (CRU) scale. Explanatory variables in the multiple regression analysis were facilitation, organisational context and the interaction terms. Facilitation was measured by the frequency of contacts between care aides and clinical educator or person who brings new ideas about resident care. Three core organisational context variables were measured using the Alberta Context Tool. RESULTS: We included data of 3873 care aides from 294 care units in the LTC facilities. We found significant associations between CRU and facilitation, leadership, culture and evaluation. Interactions of facilitation x leadership and facilitation x culture were negative. The coefficient of the facilitation x evaluation term in the regression model was positive (0.019, 95% CI 0.012 to 0.026), suggesting synergistic effects between facilitation and a well-developed process to evaluate care quality using relevant data. CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate clinical educators are effective facilitators of research use among the care aides, but the effect is modified by organisational context. For greatest impact, managers can direct efforts of the clinical educators to care units where leadership and culture ratings are lowest, but a proficient feedback and evaluation process is in place. This understanding enables managers to deploy clinical educators (a scarce resource in LTC settings) most efficiently.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6082467
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60824672018-08-10 Importance of clinical educators to research use and suggestions for better efficiency and effectiveness: results of a cross-sectional survey of care aides in Canadian long-term care facilities Lo, T K T Hoben, Matthias Norton, Peter G Teare, Gary F Estabrooks, Carole A BMJ Open Nursing OBJECTIVE: This study explored the effect of clinical educators as facilitators of research use and how it may be modified by organisational context in the settings. DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study. SETTING: A representative sample of 91 residential long-term care (LTC) facilities across Western Canada. PARTICIPANTS: We used surveys to collect data from the frontline care aides and information about the organisational context of the care units. OUTCOME MEASURE AND EXPLANATORY VARIABLES: We assessed research use (the outcome) with the Conceptual Research Utilization (CRU) scale. Explanatory variables in the multiple regression analysis were facilitation, organisational context and the interaction terms. Facilitation was measured by the frequency of contacts between care aides and clinical educator or person who brings new ideas about resident care. Three core organisational context variables were measured using the Alberta Context Tool. RESULTS: We included data of 3873 care aides from 294 care units in the LTC facilities. We found significant associations between CRU and facilitation, leadership, culture and evaluation. Interactions of facilitation x leadership and facilitation x culture were negative. The coefficient of the facilitation x evaluation term in the regression model was positive (0.019, 95% CI 0.012 to 0.026), suggesting synergistic effects between facilitation and a well-developed process to evaluate care quality using relevant data. CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate clinical educators are effective facilitators of research use among the care aides, but the effect is modified by organisational context. For greatest impact, managers can direct efforts of the clinical educators to care units where leadership and culture ratings are lowest, but a proficient feedback and evaluation process is in place. This understanding enables managers to deploy clinical educators (a scarce resource in LTC settings) most efficiently. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6082467/ /pubmed/30007925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020074 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Nursing
Lo, T K T
Hoben, Matthias
Norton, Peter G
Teare, Gary F
Estabrooks, Carole A
Importance of clinical educators to research use and suggestions for better efficiency and effectiveness: results of a cross-sectional survey of care aides in Canadian long-term care facilities
title Importance of clinical educators to research use and suggestions for better efficiency and effectiveness: results of a cross-sectional survey of care aides in Canadian long-term care facilities
title_full Importance of clinical educators to research use and suggestions for better efficiency and effectiveness: results of a cross-sectional survey of care aides in Canadian long-term care facilities
title_fullStr Importance of clinical educators to research use and suggestions for better efficiency and effectiveness: results of a cross-sectional survey of care aides in Canadian long-term care facilities
title_full_unstemmed Importance of clinical educators to research use and suggestions for better efficiency and effectiveness: results of a cross-sectional survey of care aides in Canadian long-term care facilities
title_short Importance of clinical educators to research use and suggestions for better efficiency and effectiveness: results of a cross-sectional survey of care aides in Canadian long-term care facilities
title_sort importance of clinical educators to research use and suggestions for better efficiency and effectiveness: results of a cross-sectional survey of care aides in canadian long-term care facilities
topic Nursing
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6082467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30007925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020074
work_keys_str_mv AT lotkt importanceofclinicaleducatorstoresearchuseandsuggestionsforbetterefficiencyandeffectivenessresultsofacrosssectionalsurveyofcareaidesincanadianlongtermcarefacilities
AT hobenmatthias importanceofclinicaleducatorstoresearchuseandsuggestionsforbetterefficiencyandeffectivenessresultsofacrosssectionalsurveyofcareaidesincanadianlongtermcarefacilities
AT nortonpeterg importanceofclinicaleducatorstoresearchuseandsuggestionsforbetterefficiencyandeffectivenessresultsofacrosssectionalsurveyofcareaidesincanadianlongtermcarefacilities
AT tearegaryf importanceofclinicaleducatorstoresearchuseandsuggestionsforbetterefficiencyandeffectivenessresultsofacrosssectionalsurveyofcareaidesincanadianlongtermcarefacilities
AT estabrookscarolea importanceofclinicaleducatorstoresearchuseandsuggestionsforbetterefficiencyandeffectivenessresultsofacrosssectionalsurveyofcareaidesincanadianlongtermcarefacilities