Cargando…
Evaluating the validity of the selection measures used for the UK’s foundation medical training programme: a national cohort study
OBJECTIVES: Currently relative performance at medical school (educational performance measure (EPM) decile), additional educational achievements and the score on a situational judgement test (SJT) are used to rank applicants to the UK Foundation Years postgraduate medical training programme. We soug...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6082493/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30007931 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021918 |
_version_ | 1783345807612706816 |
---|---|
author | Smith, Daniel T Tiffin, Paul A |
author_facet | Smith, Daniel T Tiffin, Paul A |
author_sort | Smith, Daniel T |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Currently relative performance at medical school (educational performance measure (EPM) decile), additional educational achievements and the score on a situational judgement test (SJT) are used to rank applicants to the UK Foundation Years postgraduate medical training programme. We sought to evaluate whether these three measures were predictive of subsequent successful completion of the programme, and thus were valid selection criteria. METHODS: Data were obtained from the UK Medical Education Database (UKMED) on 14 131 UK applicants to the foundation programme starting in 2013 and 2014. These data included training outcomes in the form of Annual Reviews of Competency Progression (ARCPs), which indicated whether the programme was successfully completed. The relationship between applicants’ performance on the three selection measures to the odds of successful programme completion were modelled. RESULTS: On univariable analyses, all three measures were associated with the odds of successful completion of the programme. Converting the SJT score to deciles to compare the effect sizes suggested that one decile increase in the EPM increased the odds of completing the programme by approximately 15%, whereas the equivalent value was 8% for the SJT scores. On multivariable analyses (with all three measures included in the model), these effects were only independently and statistically significant for EPM decile (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.18, p<0.001) and SJT z-score decile (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.09, p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The EPM decile and SJT scores may be effective selection measures for the foundation programme. However, educational achievements does not add value to the other two measures when predicting programme completion. Thus, its usefulness in this context is less clear. Moreover, our findings suggest that the weighting for the EPM decile score, relative to SJT performance, should be increased. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6082493 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60824932018-08-10 Evaluating the validity of the selection measures used for the UK’s foundation medical training programme: a national cohort study Smith, Daniel T Tiffin, Paul A BMJ Open Medical Education and Training OBJECTIVES: Currently relative performance at medical school (educational performance measure (EPM) decile), additional educational achievements and the score on a situational judgement test (SJT) are used to rank applicants to the UK Foundation Years postgraduate medical training programme. We sought to evaluate whether these three measures were predictive of subsequent successful completion of the programme, and thus were valid selection criteria. METHODS: Data were obtained from the UK Medical Education Database (UKMED) on 14 131 UK applicants to the foundation programme starting in 2013 and 2014. These data included training outcomes in the form of Annual Reviews of Competency Progression (ARCPs), which indicated whether the programme was successfully completed. The relationship between applicants’ performance on the three selection measures to the odds of successful programme completion were modelled. RESULTS: On univariable analyses, all three measures were associated with the odds of successful completion of the programme. Converting the SJT score to deciles to compare the effect sizes suggested that one decile increase in the EPM increased the odds of completing the programme by approximately 15%, whereas the equivalent value was 8% for the SJT scores. On multivariable analyses (with all three measures included in the model), these effects were only independently and statistically significant for EPM decile (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.18, p<0.001) and SJT z-score decile (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.09, p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The EPM decile and SJT scores may be effective selection measures for the foundation programme. However, educational achievements does not add value to the other two measures when predicting programme completion. Thus, its usefulness in this context is less clear. Moreover, our findings suggest that the weighting for the EPM decile score, relative to SJT performance, should be increased. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6082493/ /pubmed/30007931 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021918 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Medical Education and Training Smith, Daniel T Tiffin, Paul A Evaluating the validity of the selection measures used for the UK’s foundation medical training programme: a national cohort study |
title | Evaluating the validity of the selection measures used for the UK’s foundation medical training programme: a national cohort study |
title_full | Evaluating the validity of the selection measures used for the UK’s foundation medical training programme: a national cohort study |
title_fullStr | Evaluating the validity of the selection measures used for the UK’s foundation medical training programme: a national cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the validity of the selection measures used for the UK’s foundation medical training programme: a national cohort study |
title_short | Evaluating the validity of the selection measures used for the UK’s foundation medical training programme: a national cohort study |
title_sort | evaluating the validity of the selection measures used for the uk’s foundation medical training programme: a national cohort study |
topic | Medical Education and Training |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6082493/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30007931 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021918 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smithdanielt evaluatingthevalidityoftheselectionmeasuresusedfortheuksfoundationmedicaltrainingprogrammeanationalcohortstudy AT tiffinpaula evaluatingthevalidityoftheselectionmeasuresusedfortheuksfoundationmedicaltrainingprogrammeanationalcohortstudy |