Cargando…

Supplementation of different fat sources affects growth performance and carcass composition of finishing pigs

BACKGROUND: There are various fat sources with different energy values and fatty acid compositions that may affect growth performance and carcass composition of grow-finishing pigs. A higher net energy was recently reported in choice white grease compared with soybean oil. Therefore, two experiments...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Yanhong, Kil, Dong Yong, Perez-Mendoza, Victor G., Song, Minho, Pettigrew, James E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6102932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30167305
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40104-018-0274-9
_version_ 1783349271814209536
author Liu, Yanhong
Kil, Dong Yong
Perez-Mendoza, Victor G.
Song, Minho
Pettigrew, James E.
author_facet Liu, Yanhong
Kil, Dong Yong
Perez-Mendoza, Victor G.
Song, Minho
Pettigrew, James E.
author_sort Liu, Yanhong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There are various fat sources with different energy values and fatty acid compositions that may affect growth performance and carcass composition of grow-finishing pigs. A higher net energy was recently reported in choice white grease compared with soybean oil. Therefore, two experiments were conducted to determine whether practical responses confirm that difference between choice white grease and soybean oil, and to extend the observations to other fat sources. RESULTS: In Exp. 1, pigs fed fats had lower (P < 0.05) average daily feed intake in phase II and overall period, greater (P < 0.05) gain:feed in phase I, phase II, and overall period than pigs fed the control diet. Pigs fed fats tended (P = 0.057) to have thicker backfat depth at the last rib than those fed control. Pigs fed 6% fats had greater (P < 0.01) gain:feed in phase II and overall period than pigs fed 3% fats. During phase I, pigs fed choice white grease grew faster (P < 0.05) than pigs fed soybean oil. In Exp. 2, pigs fed dietary fats (soybean oil, choice white grease, animal-vegetable blend, palm oil, or tallow) had greater (P < 0.01) gain:feed in each phase and overall period, greater (P < 0.01) average daily gain in phase I, but lower (P < 0.01) average daily feed intake in phase II an overall than pigs fed the control diets. The choice white grease also increased (P < 0.05) average daily gain during phase I compared with soybean oil. Pigs fed palm oil had thicker (P < 0.05) backfat depth at the 10(th) rib than those fed soybean oil, animal-vegetable blend, or tallow. CONCLUSIONS: Inclusion of 6% dietary fat improved feed efficiency of finishing pigs, while different fats produced different practical results that may be consistent with their different energy values. Results from the early stage indicate that dietary fats with relatively more saturated fatty acids may provide greater energy than those with relatively more unsaturated fatty acids for growing pigs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6102932
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61029322018-08-30 Supplementation of different fat sources affects growth performance and carcass composition of finishing pigs Liu, Yanhong Kil, Dong Yong Perez-Mendoza, Victor G. Song, Minho Pettigrew, James E. J Anim Sci Biotechnol Research BACKGROUND: There are various fat sources with different energy values and fatty acid compositions that may affect growth performance and carcass composition of grow-finishing pigs. A higher net energy was recently reported in choice white grease compared with soybean oil. Therefore, two experiments were conducted to determine whether practical responses confirm that difference between choice white grease and soybean oil, and to extend the observations to other fat sources. RESULTS: In Exp. 1, pigs fed fats had lower (P < 0.05) average daily feed intake in phase II and overall period, greater (P < 0.05) gain:feed in phase I, phase II, and overall period than pigs fed the control diet. Pigs fed fats tended (P = 0.057) to have thicker backfat depth at the last rib than those fed control. Pigs fed 6% fats had greater (P < 0.01) gain:feed in phase II and overall period than pigs fed 3% fats. During phase I, pigs fed choice white grease grew faster (P < 0.05) than pigs fed soybean oil. In Exp. 2, pigs fed dietary fats (soybean oil, choice white grease, animal-vegetable blend, palm oil, or tallow) had greater (P < 0.01) gain:feed in each phase and overall period, greater (P < 0.01) average daily gain in phase I, but lower (P < 0.01) average daily feed intake in phase II an overall than pigs fed the control diets. The choice white grease also increased (P < 0.05) average daily gain during phase I compared with soybean oil. Pigs fed palm oil had thicker (P < 0.05) backfat depth at the 10(th) rib than those fed soybean oil, animal-vegetable blend, or tallow. CONCLUSIONS: Inclusion of 6% dietary fat improved feed efficiency of finishing pigs, while different fats produced different practical results that may be consistent with their different energy values. Results from the early stage indicate that dietary fats with relatively more saturated fatty acids may provide greater energy than those with relatively more unsaturated fatty acids for growing pigs. BioMed Central 2018-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6102932/ /pubmed/30167305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40104-018-0274-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Liu, Yanhong
Kil, Dong Yong
Perez-Mendoza, Victor G.
Song, Minho
Pettigrew, James E.
Supplementation of different fat sources affects growth performance and carcass composition of finishing pigs
title Supplementation of different fat sources affects growth performance and carcass composition of finishing pigs
title_full Supplementation of different fat sources affects growth performance and carcass composition of finishing pigs
title_fullStr Supplementation of different fat sources affects growth performance and carcass composition of finishing pigs
title_full_unstemmed Supplementation of different fat sources affects growth performance and carcass composition of finishing pigs
title_short Supplementation of different fat sources affects growth performance and carcass composition of finishing pigs
title_sort supplementation of different fat sources affects growth performance and carcass composition of finishing pigs
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6102932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30167305
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40104-018-0274-9
work_keys_str_mv AT liuyanhong supplementationofdifferentfatsourcesaffectsgrowthperformanceandcarcasscompositionoffinishingpigs
AT kildongyong supplementationofdifferentfatsourcesaffectsgrowthperformanceandcarcasscompositionoffinishingpigs
AT perezmendozavictorg supplementationofdifferentfatsourcesaffectsgrowthperformanceandcarcasscompositionoffinishingpigs
AT songminho supplementationofdifferentfatsourcesaffectsgrowthperformanceandcarcasscompositionoffinishingpigs
AT pettigrewjamese supplementationofdifferentfatsourcesaffectsgrowthperformanceandcarcasscompositionoffinishingpigs