Cargando…

Optimal intensity of PNF stretching: maintaining the efficacy of stretching while ensuring its safety

[Purpose] To investigate changes in hamstring flexibility in relation to intensity of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching and changes in pain over time, and examine the correlations between pain level and target intensity or flexibility gain. [Participants and Methods] Sixty-one hea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Lim, Wootaek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6110207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30154610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.30.1108
_version_ 1783350436482252800
author Lim, Wootaek
author_facet Lim, Wootaek
author_sort Lim, Wootaek
collection PubMed
description [Purpose] To investigate changes in hamstring flexibility in relation to intensity of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching and changes in pain over time, and examine the correlations between pain level and target intensity or flexibility gain. [Participants and Methods] Sixty-one healthy adults were randomly divided into 4 groups (100% [P100], 70% [P70], 40% [P40], and 10% [P10] of maximum voluntary isometric contraction) according to intensity of hold-relax stretching. Hamstring flexibility was measured with the active knee extension test, and pain was measured using the visual analogue scale. [Results] Concerning hamstring flexibility, P100 showed significant differences from P40 and P10, and P70 was significantly different from P10. At post-stretch, P100 significantly differed from P70, P40, and P10 in visual analogue scale. At 1 day, P100 significantly differed from P40 and P10. Although there was a significant correlation between post-stretch pain level and stretching intensity, there was no significant correlation between pain level and flexibility improvement. [Conclusion] Repetitive high-intensity stretching may cause heavy burden on muscle tissues, and pain caused by high-intensity stretching can hinder muscle performance. Moderate stretching intensity is recommended and considered conducive to maintaining the effects of stretching while ensuring its safety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6110207
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Society of Physical Therapy Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61102072018-08-28 Optimal intensity of PNF stretching: maintaining the efficacy of stretching while ensuring its safety Lim, Wootaek J Phys Ther Sci Original Article [Purpose] To investigate changes in hamstring flexibility in relation to intensity of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching and changes in pain over time, and examine the correlations between pain level and target intensity or flexibility gain. [Participants and Methods] Sixty-one healthy adults were randomly divided into 4 groups (100% [P100], 70% [P70], 40% [P40], and 10% [P10] of maximum voluntary isometric contraction) according to intensity of hold-relax stretching. Hamstring flexibility was measured with the active knee extension test, and pain was measured using the visual analogue scale. [Results] Concerning hamstring flexibility, P100 showed significant differences from P40 and P10, and P70 was significantly different from P10. At post-stretch, P100 significantly differed from P70, P40, and P10 in visual analogue scale. At 1 day, P100 significantly differed from P40 and P10. Although there was a significant correlation between post-stretch pain level and stretching intensity, there was no significant correlation between pain level and flexibility improvement. [Conclusion] Repetitive high-intensity stretching may cause heavy burden on muscle tissues, and pain caused by high-intensity stretching can hinder muscle performance. Moderate stretching intensity is recommended and considered conducive to maintaining the effects of stretching while ensuring its safety. The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2018-08-07 2018-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6110207/ /pubmed/30154610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.30.1108 Text en 2018©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Article
Lim, Wootaek
Optimal intensity of PNF stretching: maintaining the efficacy of stretching while ensuring its safety
title Optimal intensity of PNF stretching: maintaining the efficacy of stretching while ensuring its safety
title_full Optimal intensity of PNF stretching: maintaining the efficacy of stretching while ensuring its safety
title_fullStr Optimal intensity of PNF stretching: maintaining the efficacy of stretching while ensuring its safety
title_full_unstemmed Optimal intensity of PNF stretching: maintaining the efficacy of stretching while ensuring its safety
title_short Optimal intensity of PNF stretching: maintaining the efficacy of stretching while ensuring its safety
title_sort optimal intensity of pnf stretching: maintaining the efficacy of stretching while ensuring its safety
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6110207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30154610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.30.1108
work_keys_str_mv AT limwootaek optimalintensityofpnfstretchingmaintainingtheefficacyofstretchingwhileensuringitssafety