Cargando…

Laparostomy during pregnancy: A case report

INTRODUCTION: Acute appendicitis is the main indication for surgery during pregnancy. Physiologic changes during pregnancy and fear of using ionising radiation exams are some of the reasons to delayed diagnosis and consequently to higher morbidity and mortality rates for mother and fetus. PRESENTATI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Logrado, Ana, Constantino, Júlio, Pereira, Jorge, Casimiro, Carlos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6110995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30149329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2018.08.029
_version_ 1783350576299376640
author Logrado, Ana
Constantino, Júlio
Pereira, Jorge
Casimiro, Carlos
author_facet Logrado, Ana
Constantino, Júlio
Pereira, Jorge
Casimiro, Carlos
author_sort Logrado, Ana
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Acute appendicitis is the main indication for surgery during pregnancy. Physiologic changes during pregnancy and fear of using ionising radiation exams are some of the reasons to delayed diagnosis and consequently to higher morbidity and mortality rates for mother and fetus. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We present the case of a 38-year-old woman that resorted to the emergency room on the 13th week of pregnancy with abdominal discomfort, nausea and vomiting that lasted for 7 days. She had been in the Obstetric Emergency Department 6 days prior with the same complaints. She had no fever and she was discharged home following normal obstetric ultrasound. On this second visit, after surgical consultation, septic shock with abdominal source was recognised and patient was taken for emergency exploratory laparotomy. Intraoperatively we found generalised purulent peritonitis secondary to perforated acute appendicitis. Appendectomy, thorough abdominal washing and laparostomy were performed. Patient was admitted on the Intensive Care Unit with septic shock, need for vasopressor therapy and dialysis. Four days after the first intervention the abdominal cavity was closed. She was discharged home on the 14th post-operative day and maintained obstetric follow-up for the remaining uncomplicated pregnancy. DISCUSSION: In the presented clinical case, diagnostic delay evolves to abdominal sepsis that demanded a damage control approach. Laparostomy constitutes a damage control gesture, limiting abdominal contamination, preventing abdominal compartment syndrome and allowing subsequent surgical revisions. CONCLUSION: Acute abdominal approach using laparostomy allowed for a good outcome, maintaining ongoing pregnancy and with incisional hernia as the only observed morbidity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6110995
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61109952018-08-30 Laparostomy during pregnancy: A case report Logrado, Ana Constantino, Júlio Pereira, Jorge Casimiro, Carlos Int J Surg Case Rep Article INTRODUCTION: Acute appendicitis is the main indication for surgery during pregnancy. Physiologic changes during pregnancy and fear of using ionising radiation exams are some of the reasons to delayed diagnosis and consequently to higher morbidity and mortality rates for mother and fetus. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We present the case of a 38-year-old woman that resorted to the emergency room on the 13th week of pregnancy with abdominal discomfort, nausea and vomiting that lasted for 7 days. She had been in the Obstetric Emergency Department 6 days prior with the same complaints. She had no fever and she was discharged home following normal obstetric ultrasound. On this second visit, after surgical consultation, septic shock with abdominal source was recognised and patient was taken for emergency exploratory laparotomy. Intraoperatively we found generalised purulent peritonitis secondary to perforated acute appendicitis. Appendectomy, thorough abdominal washing and laparostomy were performed. Patient was admitted on the Intensive Care Unit with septic shock, need for vasopressor therapy and dialysis. Four days after the first intervention the abdominal cavity was closed. She was discharged home on the 14th post-operative day and maintained obstetric follow-up for the remaining uncomplicated pregnancy. DISCUSSION: In the presented clinical case, diagnostic delay evolves to abdominal sepsis that demanded a damage control approach. Laparostomy constitutes a damage control gesture, limiting abdominal contamination, preventing abdominal compartment syndrome and allowing subsequent surgical revisions. CONCLUSION: Acute abdominal approach using laparostomy allowed for a good outcome, maintaining ongoing pregnancy and with incisional hernia as the only observed morbidity. Elsevier 2018-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6110995/ /pubmed/30149329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2018.08.029 Text en © 2018 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Logrado, Ana
Constantino, Júlio
Pereira, Jorge
Casimiro, Carlos
Laparostomy during pregnancy: A case report
title Laparostomy during pregnancy: A case report
title_full Laparostomy during pregnancy: A case report
title_fullStr Laparostomy during pregnancy: A case report
title_full_unstemmed Laparostomy during pregnancy: A case report
title_short Laparostomy during pregnancy: A case report
title_sort laparostomy during pregnancy: a case report
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6110995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30149329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2018.08.029
work_keys_str_mv AT logradoana laparostomyduringpregnancyacasereport
AT constantinojulio laparostomyduringpregnancyacasereport
AT pereirajorge laparostomyduringpregnancyacasereport
AT casimirocarlos laparostomyduringpregnancyacasereport