Cargando…
Multiple imputation for patient reported outcome measures in randomised controlled trials: advantages and disadvantages of imputing at the item, subscale or composite score level
BACKGROUND: Missing data can introduce bias in the results of randomised controlled trials (RCTs), but are typically unavoidable in pragmatic clinical research, especially when patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are used. Traditionally applied to the composite PROMs score of multi-item instru...
Autores principales: | Rombach, Ines, Gray, Alastair M., Jenkinson, Crispin, Murray, David W., Rivero-Arias, Oliver |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6114240/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30153796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0542-6 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Correction to: multiple imputation for patient reported outcome measures in randomised controlled trials: advantages and disadvantages of imputing at the item, subscale or composite score level
por: Rombach, Ines, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Comparison of statistical approaches for analyzing incomplete longitudinal patient-reported outcome data in randomized controlled trials
por: Rombach, Ines, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
The current practice of handling and reporting missing outcome data in eight widely-used PROMS in RCT publications: are we doing well?
por: Rombach, Ines, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
The current practice of handling and reporting missing outcome data in eight widely used PROMs in RCT publications: a review of the current literature
por: Rombach, Ines, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Multiple imputation of multiple multi-item scales when a full imputation model is infeasible
por: Plumpton, Catrin O., et al.
Publicado: (2016)