Cargando…

Application of dynamic modeling for survival estimation in advanced renal cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: In oncology, extrapolation of clinical outcomes beyond trial duration is traditionally achieved by parametric survival analysis using population-level outcomes. This approach may not fully capture the benefit/risk profile of immunotherapies due to their unique mechanisms of action. We eva...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deniz, Baris, Altincatal, Arman, Ambavane, Apoorva, Rao, Sumati, Doan, Justin, Malcolm, Bill, Michaelson, M. Dror, Yang, Shuo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6117067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30161244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203406
_version_ 1783351698262065152
author Deniz, Baris
Altincatal, Arman
Ambavane, Apoorva
Rao, Sumati
Doan, Justin
Malcolm, Bill
Michaelson, M. Dror
Yang, Shuo
author_facet Deniz, Baris
Altincatal, Arman
Ambavane, Apoorva
Rao, Sumati
Doan, Justin
Malcolm, Bill
Michaelson, M. Dror
Yang, Shuo
author_sort Deniz, Baris
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: In oncology, extrapolation of clinical outcomes beyond trial duration is traditionally achieved by parametric survival analysis using population-level outcomes. This approach may not fully capture the benefit/risk profile of immunotherapies due to their unique mechanisms of action. We evaluated an alternative approach—dynamic modeling—to predict outcomes in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. We compared standard parametric fitting and dynamic modeling for survival estimation of nivolumab and everolimus using data from the phase III CheckMate 025 study. METHODS: We developed two statistical approaches to predict longer-term outcomes (progression, treatment discontinuation, and survival) for nivolumab and everolimus, then compared these predictions against follow-up clinical trial data to assess their proximity to observed outcomes. For the parametric survival analyses, we selected a probability distribution based on its fit to observed population-level outcomes at 14-month minimum follow-up and used it to predict longer-term outcomes. For dynamic modeling, we used a multivariate Cox regression based on patient-level data, which included risk scores, and probability and duration of response as predictors of longer-term outcomes. Both sets of predictions were compared against trial data with 26- and 38-month minimum follow-up. RESULTS: Both statistical approaches led to comparable fits to observed trial data for median progression, discontinuation, and survival. However, beyond the trial duration, mean survival predictions differed substantially between methods for nivolumab (30.8 and 51.5 months), but not everolimus (27.2 and 29.8 months). Longer-term follow-up data from CheckMate 025 and phase I/II studies resembled dynamic model predictions for nivolumab. CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic modeling can be a good alternative to parametric survival fitting for immunotherapies because it may help better capture the longer-term benefit/risk profile and support health-economic evaluations of immunotherapies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6117067
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61170672018-09-16 Application of dynamic modeling for survival estimation in advanced renal cell carcinoma Deniz, Baris Altincatal, Arman Ambavane, Apoorva Rao, Sumati Doan, Justin Malcolm, Bill Michaelson, M. Dror Yang, Shuo PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: In oncology, extrapolation of clinical outcomes beyond trial duration is traditionally achieved by parametric survival analysis using population-level outcomes. This approach may not fully capture the benefit/risk profile of immunotherapies due to their unique mechanisms of action. We evaluated an alternative approach—dynamic modeling—to predict outcomes in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. We compared standard parametric fitting and dynamic modeling for survival estimation of nivolumab and everolimus using data from the phase III CheckMate 025 study. METHODS: We developed two statistical approaches to predict longer-term outcomes (progression, treatment discontinuation, and survival) for nivolumab and everolimus, then compared these predictions against follow-up clinical trial data to assess their proximity to observed outcomes. For the parametric survival analyses, we selected a probability distribution based on its fit to observed population-level outcomes at 14-month minimum follow-up and used it to predict longer-term outcomes. For dynamic modeling, we used a multivariate Cox regression based on patient-level data, which included risk scores, and probability and duration of response as predictors of longer-term outcomes. Both sets of predictions were compared against trial data with 26- and 38-month minimum follow-up. RESULTS: Both statistical approaches led to comparable fits to observed trial data for median progression, discontinuation, and survival. However, beyond the trial duration, mean survival predictions differed substantially between methods for nivolumab (30.8 and 51.5 months), but not everolimus (27.2 and 29.8 months). Longer-term follow-up data from CheckMate 025 and phase I/II studies resembled dynamic model predictions for nivolumab. CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic modeling can be a good alternative to parametric survival fitting for immunotherapies because it may help better capture the longer-term benefit/risk profile and support health-economic evaluations of immunotherapies. Public Library of Science 2018-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6117067/ /pubmed/30161244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203406 Text en © 2018 Deniz et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Deniz, Baris
Altincatal, Arman
Ambavane, Apoorva
Rao, Sumati
Doan, Justin
Malcolm, Bill
Michaelson, M. Dror
Yang, Shuo
Application of dynamic modeling for survival estimation in advanced renal cell carcinoma
title Application of dynamic modeling for survival estimation in advanced renal cell carcinoma
title_full Application of dynamic modeling for survival estimation in advanced renal cell carcinoma
title_fullStr Application of dynamic modeling for survival estimation in advanced renal cell carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Application of dynamic modeling for survival estimation in advanced renal cell carcinoma
title_short Application of dynamic modeling for survival estimation in advanced renal cell carcinoma
title_sort application of dynamic modeling for survival estimation in advanced renal cell carcinoma
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6117067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30161244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203406
work_keys_str_mv AT denizbaris applicationofdynamicmodelingforsurvivalestimationinadvancedrenalcellcarcinoma
AT altincatalarman applicationofdynamicmodelingforsurvivalestimationinadvancedrenalcellcarcinoma
AT ambavaneapoorva applicationofdynamicmodelingforsurvivalestimationinadvancedrenalcellcarcinoma
AT raosumati applicationofdynamicmodelingforsurvivalestimationinadvancedrenalcellcarcinoma
AT doanjustin applicationofdynamicmodelingforsurvivalestimationinadvancedrenalcellcarcinoma
AT malcolmbill applicationofdynamicmodelingforsurvivalestimationinadvancedrenalcellcarcinoma
AT michaelsonmdror applicationofdynamicmodelingforsurvivalestimationinadvancedrenalcellcarcinoma
AT yangshuo applicationofdynamicmodelingforsurvivalestimationinadvancedrenalcellcarcinoma