Cargando…

Reading Deficits in Intellectual Disability Are still an Open Question: A Narrative Review

Background. In children with intellectual disability (ID), the acquisition of reading skills constitutes a basic step towards the possibility of independent living, social inclusion and participation. Methods. We carried out a narrative review of the literature on reading fluency and accuracy of ind...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Di Blasi, Francesco Domenico, Buono, Serafino, Città, Santina, Costanzo, Angela Antonia, Zoccolotti, Pierluigi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6119986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30087288
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci8080146
_version_ 1783352178479464448
author Di Blasi, Francesco Domenico
Buono, Serafino
Città, Santina
Costanzo, Angela Antonia
Zoccolotti, Pierluigi
author_facet Di Blasi, Francesco Domenico
Buono, Serafino
Città, Santina
Costanzo, Angela Antonia
Zoccolotti, Pierluigi
author_sort Di Blasi, Francesco Domenico
collection PubMed
description Background. In children with intellectual disability (ID), the acquisition of reading skills constitutes a basic step towards the possibility of independent living, social inclusion and participation. Methods. We carried out a narrative review of the literature on reading fluency and accuracy of individuals with ID resulting from different genetic syndromes (Fragile X, Williams, Velocardiofacial, Prader-Willi, and Down syndrome). Our aim was to define their reading profiles in light of the dual-route reading model. For this purpose, studies that examined both word and non-word reading in children with ID were included in the analysis. Results. Seventeen studies emerged based on the selection criteria. The results were different depending on the control group used. A deficit in reading non-words emerged in studies that used the reading-level match design but not when standardized scores were used, when controls were age-matched or when a mental age matching was used. Thus, a deficit in reading non-words emerged only in studies that used the reading-level match design. However, severe methodological criticisms were recently raised about the use of this matching design. Conclusions. In view of the methodological problems in using grade equivalents, it is premature to draw definite conclusions about the reading profile of children with ID resulting from different genetic syndromes. In any case, the reviewed evidence provides little support for the idea that children with ID have selective difficulty in phonological reading. Thus, the reading profile of children with ID remains an open question that needs to be investigated by means of methodologically sound research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6119986
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61199862018-09-06 Reading Deficits in Intellectual Disability Are still an Open Question: A Narrative Review Di Blasi, Francesco Domenico Buono, Serafino Città, Santina Costanzo, Angela Antonia Zoccolotti, Pierluigi Brain Sci Review Background. In children with intellectual disability (ID), the acquisition of reading skills constitutes a basic step towards the possibility of independent living, social inclusion and participation. Methods. We carried out a narrative review of the literature on reading fluency and accuracy of individuals with ID resulting from different genetic syndromes (Fragile X, Williams, Velocardiofacial, Prader-Willi, and Down syndrome). Our aim was to define their reading profiles in light of the dual-route reading model. For this purpose, studies that examined both word and non-word reading in children with ID were included in the analysis. Results. Seventeen studies emerged based on the selection criteria. The results were different depending on the control group used. A deficit in reading non-words emerged in studies that used the reading-level match design but not when standardized scores were used, when controls were age-matched or when a mental age matching was used. Thus, a deficit in reading non-words emerged only in studies that used the reading-level match design. However, severe methodological criticisms were recently raised about the use of this matching design. Conclusions. In view of the methodological problems in using grade equivalents, it is premature to draw definite conclusions about the reading profile of children with ID resulting from different genetic syndromes. In any case, the reviewed evidence provides little support for the idea that children with ID have selective difficulty in phonological reading. Thus, the reading profile of children with ID remains an open question that needs to be investigated by means of methodologically sound research. MDPI 2018-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6119986/ /pubmed/30087288 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci8080146 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Di Blasi, Francesco Domenico
Buono, Serafino
Città, Santina
Costanzo, Angela Antonia
Zoccolotti, Pierluigi
Reading Deficits in Intellectual Disability Are still an Open Question: A Narrative Review
title Reading Deficits in Intellectual Disability Are still an Open Question: A Narrative Review
title_full Reading Deficits in Intellectual Disability Are still an Open Question: A Narrative Review
title_fullStr Reading Deficits in Intellectual Disability Are still an Open Question: A Narrative Review
title_full_unstemmed Reading Deficits in Intellectual Disability Are still an Open Question: A Narrative Review
title_short Reading Deficits in Intellectual Disability Are still an Open Question: A Narrative Review
title_sort reading deficits in intellectual disability are still an open question: a narrative review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6119986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30087288
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci8080146
work_keys_str_mv AT diblasifrancescodomenico readingdeficitsinintellectualdisabilityarestillanopenquestionanarrativereview
AT buonoserafino readingdeficitsinintellectualdisabilityarestillanopenquestionanarrativereview
AT cittasantina readingdeficitsinintellectualdisabilityarestillanopenquestionanarrativereview
AT costanzoangelaantonia readingdeficitsinintellectualdisabilityarestillanopenquestionanarrativereview
AT zoccolottipierluigi readingdeficitsinintellectualdisabilityarestillanopenquestionanarrativereview