Cargando…

Improving the visualization, interpretation and analysis of two-sample summary data Mendelian randomization via the Radial plot and Radial regression

BACKGROUND: Summary data furnishing a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study are often visualized with the aid of a scatter plot, in which single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)–outcome associations are plotted against the SNP–exposure associations to provide an immediate picture of the causal-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bowden, Jack, Spiller, Wesley, Del Greco M, Fabiola, Sheehan, Nuala, Thompson, John, Minelli, Cosetta, Davey Smith, George
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6124632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29961852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyy101
_version_ 1783353056152256512
author Bowden, Jack
Spiller, Wesley
Del Greco M, Fabiola
Sheehan, Nuala
Thompson, John
Minelli, Cosetta
Davey Smith, George
author_facet Bowden, Jack
Spiller, Wesley
Del Greco M, Fabiola
Sheehan, Nuala
Thompson, John
Minelli, Cosetta
Davey Smith, George
author_sort Bowden, Jack
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Summary data furnishing a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study are often visualized with the aid of a scatter plot, in which single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)–outcome associations are plotted against the SNP–exposure associations to provide an immediate picture of the causal-effect estimate for each individual variant. It is also convenient to overlay the standard inverse-variance weighted (IVW) estimate of causal effect as a fitted slope, to see whether an individual SNP provides evidence that supports, or conflicts with, the overall consensus. Unfortunately, the traditional scatter plot is not the most appropriate means to achieve this aim whenever SNP–outcome associations are estimated with varying degrees of precision and this is reflected in the analysis. METHODS: We propose instead to use a small modification of the scatter plot—the Galbraith Radial plot—for the presentation of data and results from an MR study, which enjoys many advantages over the original method. On a practical level, it removes the need to recode the genetic data and enables a more straightforward detection of outliers and influential data points. Its use extends beyond the purely aesthetic, however, to suggest a more general modelling framework to operate within when conducting an MR study, including a new form of MR-Egger regression. RESULTS: We illustrate the methods using data from a two-sample MR study to probe the causal effect of systolic blood pressure on coronary heart disease risk, allowing for the possible effects of pleiotropy. The Radial plot is shown to aid the detection of a single outlying variant that is responsible for large differences between IVW and MR-Egger regression estimates. Several additional plots are also proposed for informative data visualization. CONCLUSIONS: The Radial plot should be considered in place of the scatter plot for visualizing, analysing and interpreting data from a two-sample summary data MR study. Software is provided to help facilitate its use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6124632
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61246322018-09-10 Improving the visualization, interpretation and analysis of two-sample summary data Mendelian randomization via the Radial plot and Radial regression Bowden, Jack Spiller, Wesley Del Greco M, Fabiola Sheehan, Nuala Thompson, John Minelli, Cosetta Davey Smith, George Int J Epidemiol Methods BACKGROUND: Summary data furnishing a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study are often visualized with the aid of a scatter plot, in which single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)–outcome associations are plotted against the SNP–exposure associations to provide an immediate picture of the causal-effect estimate for each individual variant. It is also convenient to overlay the standard inverse-variance weighted (IVW) estimate of causal effect as a fitted slope, to see whether an individual SNP provides evidence that supports, or conflicts with, the overall consensus. Unfortunately, the traditional scatter plot is not the most appropriate means to achieve this aim whenever SNP–outcome associations are estimated with varying degrees of precision and this is reflected in the analysis. METHODS: We propose instead to use a small modification of the scatter plot—the Galbraith Radial plot—for the presentation of data and results from an MR study, which enjoys many advantages over the original method. On a practical level, it removes the need to recode the genetic data and enables a more straightforward detection of outliers and influential data points. Its use extends beyond the purely aesthetic, however, to suggest a more general modelling framework to operate within when conducting an MR study, including a new form of MR-Egger regression. RESULTS: We illustrate the methods using data from a two-sample MR study to probe the causal effect of systolic blood pressure on coronary heart disease risk, allowing for the possible effects of pleiotropy. The Radial plot is shown to aid the detection of a single outlying variant that is responsible for large differences between IVW and MR-Egger regression estimates. Several additional plots are also proposed for informative data visualization. CONCLUSIONS: The Radial plot should be considered in place of the scatter plot for visualizing, analysing and interpreting data from a two-sample summary data MR study. Software is provided to help facilitate its use. Oxford University Press 2018-08 2018-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6124632/ /pubmed/29961852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyy101 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methods
Bowden, Jack
Spiller, Wesley
Del Greco M, Fabiola
Sheehan, Nuala
Thompson, John
Minelli, Cosetta
Davey Smith, George
Improving the visualization, interpretation and analysis of two-sample summary data Mendelian randomization via the Radial plot and Radial regression
title Improving the visualization, interpretation and analysis of two-sample summary data Mendelian randomization via the Radial plot and Radial regression
title_full Improving the visualization, interpretation and analysis of two-sample summary data Mendelian randomization via the Radial plot and Radial regression
title_fullStr Improving the visualization, interpretation and analysis of two-sample summary data Mendelian randomization via the Radial plot and Radial regression
title_full_unstemmed Improving the visualization, interpretation and analysis of two-sample summary data Mendelian randomization via the Radial plot and Radial regression
title_short Improving the visualization, interpretation and analysis of two-sample summary data Mendelian randomization via the Radial plot and Radial regression
title_sort improving the visualization, interpretation and analysis of two-sample summary data mendelian randomization via the radial plot and radial regression
topic Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6124632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29961852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyy101
work_keys_str_mv AT bowdenjack improvingthevisualizationinterpretationandanalysisoftwosamplesummarydatamendelianrandomizationviatheradialplotandradialregression
AT spillerwesley improvingthevisualizationinterpretationandanalysisoftwosamplesummarydatamendelianrandomizationviatheradialplotandradialregression
AT delgrecomfabiola improvingthevisualizationinterpretationandanalysisoftwosamplesummarydatamendelianrandomizationviatheradialplotandradialregression
AT sheehannuala improvingthevisualizationinterpretationandanalysisoftwosamplesummarydatamendelianrandomizationviatheradialplotandradialregression
AT thompsonjohn improvingthevisualizationinterpretationandanalysisoftwosamplesummarydatamendelianrandomizationviatheradialplotandradialregression
AT minellicosetta improvingthevisualizationinterpretationandanalysisoftwosamplesummarydatamendelianrandomizationviatheradialplotandradialregression
AT daveysmithgeorge improvingthevisualizationinterpretationandanalysisoftwosamplesummarydatamendelianrandomizationviatheradialplotandradialregression