Cargando…

The efficacy of self-directed learning versus problem-based learning for teaching and learning ophthalmology: a comparative study

INTRODUCTION: Self-directed learning (SDL) and problem-based learning (PBL) are fundamental tools to achieve lifelong learning in an integrated medical curriculum. However, the efficacy of SDL in some clinical courses is debated. AIM: The aim of the study was to measure the effectiveness of SDL for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Atta, Ihab Shafek, Alghamdi, Ali Hendi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6129018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30233269
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S171328
_version_ 1783353743809445888
author Atta, Ihab Shafek
Alghamdi, Ali Hendi
author_facet Atta, Ihab Shafek
Alghamdi, Ali Hendi
author_sort Atta, Ihab Shafek
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Self-directed learning (SDL) and problem-based learning (PBL) are fundamental tools to achieve lifelong learning in an integrated medical curriculum. However, the efficacy of SDL in some clinical courses is debated. AIM: The aim of the study was to measure the effectiveness of SDL for an ophthalmology course in comparison with PBL. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted with fifth-year medical students enrolled in an ophthalmology course. SDL comprised four case-based scenarios guided by several questions. PBL comprised three sessions. An ear, nose, and throat (ENT) course was selected for comparison as a control. At the end of the course, 30 multiple-choice questions (MCQs) for both SDL and PBL were assessed and analyzed against their counterparts in the ENT course by an independent t-test. RESULTS: For the SDL component of the ophthalmology course, the number and percentages of students attaining high (n = 6/60, 10%) and moderate (n = 15/60, 28.3%) scores on an MCQs written exam were evaluated. For the PBL component, high scores were seen for 23.3% (n = 14/60), and moderate scores for 33.3% (n = 20/60) of the participants. For the SDL component of the ENT course, the number and percentages of students attaining high (n = 14/60, 23.3%) and moderate (n = 17/60, 28.3%) scores were recorded. For the PBL component, high (16/60, 26.6%) and moderate (17/60, 28%) scores were recorded. Significant p-values were obtained between the results for SDL and PBL in the ophthalmology course (p = 0.009), as well as between SDL results for both courses (p = 0.0308). Moreover, differences between the SDL results of ophthalmology and the PBL results of ENT (p = 0.0372) were significant. CONCLUSION: SDL appears to be less valuable for promotion of self-readiness. Periodic discussions in small groups or by panel discussion are strongly recommended for students to enhance readiness with SDL.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6129018
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61290182018-09-19 The efficacy of self-directed learning versus problem-based learning for teaching and learning ophthalmology: a comparative study Atta, Ihab Shafek Alghamdi, Ali Hendi Adv Med Educ Pract Original Research INTRODUCTION: Self-directed learning (SDL) and problem-based learning (PBL) are fundamental tools to achieve lifelong learning in an integrated medical curriculum. However, the efficacy of SDL in some clinical courses is debated. AIM: The aim of the study was to measure the effectiveness of SDL for an ophthalmology course in comparison with PBL. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted with fifth-year medical students enrolled in an ophthalmology course. SDL comprised four case-based scenarios guided by several questions. PBL comprised three sessions. An ear, nose, and throat (ENT) course was selected for comparison as a control. At the end of the course, 30 multiple-choice questions (MCQs) for both SDL and PBL were assessed and analyzed against their counterparts in the ENT course by an independent t-test. RESULTS: For the SDL component of the ophthalmology course, the number and percentages of students attaining high (n = 6/60, 10%) and moderate (n = 15/60, 28.3%) scores on an MCQs written exam were evaluated. For the PBL component, high scores were seen for 23.3% (n = 14/60), and moderate scores for 33.3% (n = 20/60) of the participants. For the SDL component of the ENT course, the number and percentages of students attaining high (n = 14/60, 23.3%) and moderate (n = 17/60, 28.3%) scores were recorded. For the PBL component, high (16/60, 26.6%) and moderate (17/60, 28%) scores were recorded. Significant p-values were obtained between the results for SDL and PBL in the ophthalmology course (p = 0.009), as well as between SDL results for both courses (p = 0.0308). Moreover, differences between the SDL results of ophthalmology and the PBL results of ENT (p = 0.0372) were significant. CONCLUSION: SDL appears to be less valuable for promotion of self-readiness. Periodic discussions in small groups or by panel discussion are strongly recommended for students to enhance readiness with SDL. Dove Medical Press 2018-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6129018/ /pubmed/30233269 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S171328 Text en © 2018 Atta and Alghamdi. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Atta, Ihab Shafek
Alghamdi, Ali Hendi
The efficacy of self-directed learning versus problem-based learning for teaching and learning ophthalmology: a comparative study
title The efficacy of self-directed learning versus problem-based learning for teaching and learning ophthalmology: a comparative study
title_full The efficacy of self-directed learning versus problem-based learning for teaching and learning ophthalmology: a comparative study
title_fullStr The efficacy of self-directed learning versus problem-based learning for teaching and learning ophthalmology: a comparative study
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy of self-directed learning versus problem-based learning for teaching and learning ophthalmology: a comparative study
title_short The efficacy of self-directed learning versus problem-based learning for teaching and learning ophthalmology: a comparative study
title_sort efficacy of self-directed learning versus problem-based learning for teaching and learning ophthalmology: a comparative study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6129018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30233269
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S171328
work_keys_str_mv AT attaihabshafek theefficacyofselfdirectedlearningversusproblembasedlearningforteachingandlearningophthalmologyacomparativestudy
AT alghamdialihendi theefficacyofselfdirectedlearningversusproblembasedlearningforteachingandlearningophthalmologyacomparativestudy
AT attaihabshafek efficacyofselfdirectedlearningversusproblembasedlearningforteachingandlearningophthalmologyacomparativestudy
AT alghamdialihendi efficacyofselfdirectedlearningversusproblembasedlearningforteachingandlearningophthalmologyacomparativestudy