Cargando…

Determination of Water-holding Capacity of Porcine Musculature Based on Released Water Method Using Optimal Load

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the suitability of the released water (RW) method for measuring water-holding capacity (WHC) by pressure and filter-paper absorption within two thin plastic films. One hundred fifty pork loins with considerable variations in WHC (three pork qualities: PSE, p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Joo, Seon-Tea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6131383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30206441
http://dx.doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2018.e18
_version_ 1783354091899977728
author Joo, Seon-Tea
author_facet Joo, Seon-Tea
author_sort Joo, Seon-Tea
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to evaluate the suitability of the released water (RW) method for measuring water-holding capacity (WHC) by pressure and filter-paper absorption within two thin plastic films. One hundred fifty pork loins with considerable variations in WHC (three pork qualities: PSE, pale, soft, and exudative; RFN, reddish-pink, firm, and nonexudative; and DFD, dark, firm, and dry; 50 pork loins in each pork quality group) were used to measure drip loss (DL)% and RW % after applying different loads (1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0 and 3.5 kg). Percentages of DL and RW were significantly (p<0.05) different among pork quality groups. The RW % of 2.5 kg load sample was significantly (p<0.05) higher than that of 2.0 kg or 1.5 kg load sample. However, there were no significant (p>0.05) differences in RW % among 2.5 kg, 3.0 kg, and 3.5 kg load samples for all three pork quality groups. The RW % was highly and positively correlated (r>0.95; p<0.001) with DL %. The highest correlation was observed between DL % and RW % of 2.5 kg load sample (r=0.97; p<0.001). Among all RW loads within each quality groups, the highest correlation between DL % and RW % was observed for 2.5 kg load sample (r=0.43, 0.66, and 0.46 for PSE, RFN and DFD quality groups, respectively, p<0.001). These results imply that applying 2.5 kg load is the best for determination of RW %. It is recommended as a reference method to assess DL % of pork muscles.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6131383
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61313832018-09-11 Determination of Water-holding Capacity of Porcine Musculature Based on Released Water Method Using Optimal Load Joo, Seon-Tea Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour Short Communication The purpose of this study was to evaluate the suitability of the released water (RW) method for measuring water-holding capacity (WHC) by pressure and filter-paper absorption within two thin plastic films. One hundred fifty pork loins with considerable variations in WHC (three pork qualities: PSE, pale, soft, and exudative; RFN, reddish-pink, firm, and nonexudative; and DFD, dark, firm, and dry; 50 pork loins in each pork quality group) were used to measure drip loss (DL)% and RW % after applying different loads (1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0 and 3.5 kg). Percentages of DL and RW were significantly (p<0.05) different among pork quality groups. The RW % of 2.5 kg load sample was significantly (p<0.05) higher than that of 2.0 kg or 1.5 kg load sample. However, there were no significant (p>0.05) differences in RW % among 2.5 kg, 3.0 kg, and 3.5 kg load samples for all three pork quality groups. The RW % was highly and positively correlated (r>0.95; p<0.001) with DL %. The highest correlation was observed between DL % and RW % of 2.5 kg load sample (r=0.97; p<0.001). Among all RW loads within each quality groups, the highest correlation between DL % and RW % was observed for 2.5 kg load sample (r=0.43, 0.66, and 0.46 for PSE, RFN and DFD quality groups, respectively, p<0.001). These results imply that applying 2.5 kg load is the best for determination of RW %. It is recommended as a reference method to assess DL % of pork muscles. Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources 2018-08 2018-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6131383/ /pubmed/30206441 http://dx.doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2018.e18 Text en © Copyright 2018 Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Short Communication
Joo, Seon-Tea
Determination of Water-holding Capacity of Porcine Musculature Based on Released Water Method Using Optimal Load
title Determination of Water-holding Capacity of Porcine Musculature Based on Released Water Method Using Optimal Load
title_full Determination of Water-holding Capacity of Porcine Musculature Based on Released Water Method Using Optimal Load
title_fullStr Determination of Water-holding Capacity of Porcine Musculature Based on Released Water Method Using Optimal Load
title_full_unstemmed Determination of Water-holding Capacity of Porcine Musculature Based on Released Water Method Using Optimal Load
title_short Determination of Water-holding Capacity of Porcine Musculature Based on Released Water Method Using Optimal Load
title_sort determination of water-holding capacity of porcine musculature based on released water method using optimal load
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6131383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30206441
http://dx.doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2018.e18
work_keys_str_mv AT jooseontea determinationofwaterholdingcapacityofporcinemusculaturebasedonreleasedwatermethodusingoptimalload