Cargando…

Comparative analysis of predictive methods for early assessment of compliance with continuous positive airway pressure therapy

BACKGROUND: Patients suffering obstructive sleep apnea are mainly treated with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Although it is a highly effective treatment, compliance with this therapy is problematic to achieve with serious consequences for the patients’ health. Unfortunately, there is a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rafael-Palou, Xavier, Turino, Cecilia, Steblin, Alexander, Sánchez-de-la-Torre, Manuel, Barbé, Ferran, Vargiu, Eloisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6145365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30227856
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-018-0657-z
_version_ 1783356255866191872
author Rafael-Palou, Xavier
Turino, Cecilia
Steblin, Alexander
Sánchez-de-la-Torre, Manuel
Barbé, Ferran
Vargiu, Eloisa
author_facet Rafael-Palou, Xavier
Turino, Cecilia
Steblin, Alexander
Sánchez-de-la-Torre, Manuel
Barbé, Ferran
Vargiu, Eloisa
author_sort Rafael-Palou, Xavier
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients suffering obstructive sleep apnea are mainly treated with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Although it is a highly effective treatment, compliance with this therapy is problematic to achieve with serious consequences for the patients’ health. Unfortunately, there is a clear lack of clinical analytical tools to support the early prediction of compliant patients. METHODS: This work intends to take a further step in this direction by building compliance classifiers with CPAP therapy at three different moments of the patient follow-up, before the therapy starts (baseline) and at months 1 and 3 after the baseline. RESULTS: Results of the clinical trial shows that month 3 was the time-point with the most accurate classifier reaching an f1-score of 87% and 84% in cross-validation and test. At month 1, performances were almost as high as in month 3 with 82% and 84% of f1-score. At baseline, where no information of patients’ CPAP use was given yet, the best classifier achieved 73% and 76% of f1-score in cross-validation and test set respectively. Subsequent analyzes carried out with the best classifiers of each time point revealed baseline factors (i.e. headaches, psychological symptoms, arterial hypertension and EuroQol visual analog scale) closely related to the prediction of compliance independently of the time-point. In addition, among the variables taken only during the follow-up of the patients, Epworth and the average nighttime hours were the most important to predict compliance with CPAP. CONCLUSIONS: Best classifiers reported high performances after one month of treatment, being the third month when significant differences were achieved with respect to the baseline. Four baseline variables were reported relevant for the prediction of compliance with CPAP at each time-point. Two characteristics more were also highlighted for the prediction of compliance at months 1 and 3. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier, NCT03116958. Retrospectively registered on 17 April 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12911-018-0657-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6145365
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61453652018-09-24 Comparative analysis of predictive methods for early assessment of compliance with continuous positive airway pressure therapy Rafael-Palou, Xavier Turino, Cecilia Steblin, Alexander Sánchez-de-la-Torre, Manuel Barbé, Ferran Vargiu, Eloisa BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: Patients suffering obstructive sleep apnea are mainly treated with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Although it is a highly effective treatment, compliance with this therapy is problematic to achieve with serious consequences for the patients’ health. Unfortunately, there is a clear lack of clinical analytical tools to support the early prediction of compliant patients. METHODS: This work intends to take a further step in this direction by building compliance classifiers with CPAP therapy at three different moments of the patient follow-up, before the therapy starts (baseline) and at months 1 and 3 after the baseline. RESULTS: Results of the clinical trial shows that month 3 was the time-point with the most accurate classifier reaching an f1-score of 87% and 84% in cross-validation and test. At month 1, performances were almost as high as in month 3 with 82% and 84% of f1-score. At baseline, where no information of patients’ CPAP use was given yet, the best classifier achieved 73% and 76% of f1-score in cross-validation and test set respectively. Subsequent analyzes carried out with the best classifiers of each time point revealed baseline factors (i.e. headaches, psychological symptoms, arterial hypertension and EuroQol visual analog scale) closely related to the prediction of compliance independently of the time-point. In addition, among the variables taken only during the follow-up of the patients, Epworth and the average nighttime hours were the most important to predict compliance with CPAP. CONCLUSIONS: Best classifiers reported high performances after one month of treatment, being the third month when significant differences were achieved with respect to the baseline. Four baseline variables were reported relevant for the prediction of compliance with CPAP at each time-point. Two characteristics more were also highlighted for the prediction of compliance at months 1 and 3. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier, NCT03116958. Retrospectively registered on 17 April 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12911-018-0657-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6145365/ /pubmed/30227856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-018-0657-z Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rafael-Palou, Xavier
Turino, Cecilia
Steblin, Alexander
Sánchez-de-la-Torre, Manuel
Barbé, Ferran
Vargiu, Eloisa
Comparative analysis of predictive methods for early assessment of compliance with continuous positive airway pressure therapy
title Comparative analysis of predictive methods for early assessment of compliance with continuous positive airway pressure therapy
title_full Comparative analysis of predictive methods for early assessment of compliance with continuous positive airway pressure therapy
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of predictive methods for early assessment of compliance with continuous positive airway pressure therapy
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of predictive methods for early assessment of compliance with continuous positive airway pressure therapy
title_short Comparative analysis of predictive methods for early assessment of compliance with continuous positive airway pressure therapy
title_sort comparative analysis of predictive methods for early assessment of compliance with continuous positive airway pressure therapy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6145365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30227856
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-018-0657-z
work_keys_str_mv AT rafaelpalouxavier comparativeanalysisofpredictivemethodsforearlyassessmentofcompliancewithcontinuouspositiveairwaypressuretherapy
AT turinocecilia comparativeanalysisofpredictivemethodsforearlyassessmentofcompliancewithcontinuouspositiveairwaypressuretherapy
AT steblinalexander comparativeanalysisofpredictivemethodsforearlyassessmentofcompliancewithcontinuouspositiveairwaypressuretherapy
AT sanchezdelatorremanuel comparativeanalysisofpredictivemethodsforearlyassessmentofcompliancewithcontinuouspositiveairwaypressuretherapy
AT barbeferran comparativeanalysisofpredictivemethodsforearlyassessmentofcompliancewithcontinuouspositiveairwaypressuretherapy
AT vargiueloisa comparativeanalysisofpredictivemethodsforearlyassessmentofcompliancewithcontinuouspositiveairwaypressuretherapy