Cargando…

Developing an evidence-based program sustainability training curriculum: a group randomized, multi-phase approach

BACKGROUND: The emergence of dissemination and implementation (D&I) science has driven a rapid increase in studies of how new scientific discoveries are translated and developed into evidence-based programs and policies. However, D&I science has paid much less attention to what happens to pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vitale, Rebecca, Blaine, Timothy, Zofkie, Elizabeth, Moreland-Russell, Sarah, Combs, Todd, Brownson, Ross C., Luke, Doug A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6158899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30257695
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0819-5
_version_ 1783358511127724032
author Vitale, Rebecca
Blaine, Timothy
Zofkie, Elizabeth
Moreland-Russell, Sarah
Combs, Todd
Brownson, Ross C.
Luke, Doug A.
author_facet Vitale, Rebecca
Blaine, Timothy
Zofkie, Elizabeth
Moreland-Russell, Sarah
Combs, Todd
Brownson, Ross C.
Luke, Doug A.
author_sort Vitale, Rebecca
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The emergence of dissemination and implementation (D&I) science has driven a rapid increase in studies of how new scientific discoveries are translated and developed into evidence-based programs and policies. However, D&I science has paid much less attention to what happens to programs once they have been implemented. Public health programs can only deliver benefits if they reach maturity and sustain activities over time. In order to achieve the full benefits of significant investment in public health research and program development, there must be an understanding of the factors that relate to sustainability to inform development of tools and trainings to support strategic long-term program sustainability. Tobacco control programs, specifically, vary in their abilities to support and sustain themselves over time. As of 2018, most states still do not meet the CDC-recommended level for funding their TC program, allowing tobacco use to remain the leading cause of preventable disease and death in the USA. The purpose of this study is to empirically develop, test, and disseminate training programs to improve the sustainability of evidence-based state tobacco control programs and thus, tobacco-related health outcomes. METHODS: This paper describes the methods of a group randomized, multi-phase study that evaluates the empirically developed “Program Sustainability Action Planning Training” and technical assistance in US state-level tobacco control programs. Phase 1 includes developing the sustainability action planning training curriculum and technical assistance protocol and developing measures to assess long-term program sustainability. Phase 2 includes a group randomized trial to test the effectiveness of the training and technical assistance in improving sustainability outcomes in 24 state tobacco control programs (12 intervention, 12 comparison). Phase 3 includes the active dissemination of final training curricula materials to a broader public health audience. DISCUSSION: Empirical evidence has established that program sustainability can improve through training and technical assistance; however, to our knowledge, no evidence-based sustainability training curriculum program exists. Therefore, systematic methods are needed to develop, test, and disseminate a training that improves the sustainability of evidence-based programs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03598114. Registered 25 July 2018—retrospectively registered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6158899
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61588992018-10-01 Developing an evidence-based program sustainability training curriculum: a group randomized, multi-phase approach Vitale, Rebecca Blaine, Timothy Zofkie, Elizabeth Moreland-Russell, Sarah Combs, Todd Brownson, Ross C. Luke, Doug A. Implement Sci Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The emergence of dissemination and implementation (D&I) science has driven a rapid increase in studies of how new scientific discoveries are translated and developed into evidence-based programs and policies. However, D&I science has paid much less attention to what happens to programs once they have been implemented. Public health programs can only deliver benefits if they reach maturity and sustain activities over time. In order to achieve the full benefits of significant investment in public health research and program development, there must be an understanding of the factors that relate to sustainability to inform development of tools and trainings to support strategic long-term program sustainability. Tobacco control programs, specifically, vary in their abilities to support and sustain themselves over time. As of 2018, most states still do not meet the CDC-recommended level for funding their TC program, allowing tobacco use to remain the leading cause of preventable disease and death in the USA. The purpose of this study is to empirically develop, test, and disseminate training programs to improve the sustainability of evidence-based state tobacco control programs and thus, tobacco-related health outcomes. METHODS: This paper describes the methods of a group randomized, multi-phase study that evaluates the empirically developed “Program Sustainability Action Planning Training” and technical assistance in US state-level tobacco control programs. Phase 1 includes developing the sustainability action planning training curriculum and technical assistance protocol and developing measures to assess long-term program sustainability. Phase 2 includes a group randomized trial to test the effectiveness of the training and technical assistance in improving sustainability outcomes in 24 state tobacco control programs (12 intervention, 12 comparison). Phase 3 includes the active dissemination of final training curricula materials to a broader public health audience. DISCUSSION: Empirical evidence has established that program sustainability can improve through training and technical assistance; however, to our knowledge, no evidence-based sustainability training curriculum program exists. Therefore, systematic methods are needed to develop, test, and disseminate a training that improves the sustainability of evidence-based programs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03598114. Registered 25 July 2018—retrospectively registered. BioMed Central 2018-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6158899/ /pubmed/30257695 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0819-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Vitale, Rebecca
Blaine, Timothy
Zofkie, Elizabeth
Moreland-Russell, Sarah
Combs, Todd
Brownson, Ross C.
Luke, Doug A.
Developing an evidence-based program sustainability training curriculum: a group randomized, multi-phase approach
title Developing an evidence-based program sustainability training curriculum: a group randomized, multi-phase approach
title_full Developing an evidence-based program sustainability training curriculum: a group randomized, multi-phase approach
title_fullStr Developing an evidence-based program sustainability training curriculum: a group randomized, multi-phase approach
title_full_unstemmed Developing an evidence-based program sustainability training curriculum: a group randomized, multi-phase approach
title_short Developing an evidence-based program sustainability training curriculum: a group randomized, multi-phase approach
title_sort developing an evidence-based program sustainability training curriculum: a group randomized, multi-phase approach
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6158899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30257695
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0819-5
work_keys_str_mv AT vitalerebecca developinganevidencebasedprogramsustainabilitytrainingcurriculumagrouprandomizedmultiphaseapproach
AT blainetimothy developinganevidencebasedprogramsustainabilitytrainingcurriculumagrouprandomizedmultiphaseapproach
AT zofkieelizabeth developinganevidencebasedprogramsustainabilitytrainingcurriculumagrouprandomizedmultiphaseapproach
AT morelandrussellsarah developinganevidencebasedprogramsustainabilitytrainingcurriculumagrouprandomizedmultiphaseapproach
AT combstodd developinganevidencebasedprogramsustainabilitytrainingcurriculumagrouprandomizedmultiphaseapproach
AT brownsonrossc developinganevidencebasedprogramsustainabilitytrainingcurriculumagrouprandomizedmultiphaseapproach
AT lukedouga developinganevidencebasedprogramsustainabilitytrainingcurriculumagrouprandomizedmultiphaseapproach