Cargando…

Which School Community Agents Influence Adolescents’ Motivational Outcomes and Physical Activity? Are More Autonomy-Supportive Relationships Necessarily Better?

The first aim of this work was to examine the independent influence of students’ perceived autonomy support for leisure-time physical activity (LTPA), from different school community agents, on motivational outcomes in a LTPA context and objective PA levels. Using both a variable- and person-centere...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sevil, Javier, García-González, Luis, Abós, Ángel, Generelo Lanaspa, Eduardo, Aibar Solana, Alberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6163350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30200200
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15091875
_version_ 1783359339904368640
author Sevil, Javier
García-González, Luis
Abós, Ángel
Generelo Lanaspa, Eduardo
Aibar Solana, Alberto
author_facet Sevil, Javier
García-González, Luis
Abós, Ángel
Generelo Lanaspa, Eduardo
Aibar Solana, Alberto
author_sort Sevil, Javier
collection PubMed
description The first aim of this work was to examine the independent influence of students’ perceived autonomy support for leisure-time physical activity (LTPA), from different school community agents, on motivational outcomes in a LTPA context and objective PA levels. Using both a variable- and person-centered approach, the second aim was to examine how different combinations of autonomy-support were associated with students’ motivational outcomes in a LTPA context and PA levels. A sample of 178 secondary students (M = 13.26 ± 0.64) participated in the study. Autonomy support for LTPA from the PE teacher, mother, father, and peers were the only agents that significantly and positively predicted motivational outcomes in a LTPA context and PA levels. While the two- and three-way interactions of some of these four significant sources significantly increased the explained variance of some motivational outcomes, the plots revealed that the lowest values of motivational outcomes were associated with low values of perceived autonomy support. A cluster analysis revealed five profiles. The “high autonomy support” group reported the most optimal outcomes, whereas the “low autonomy support” group showed the opposite pattern. However, mixed autonomy support profiles did not differ in any of the outcomes. The adoption of a whole-of-school approach seems decisive to empower adolescents to be active in and out of school.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6163350
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61633502018-10-12 Which School Community Agents Influence Adolescents’ Motivational Outcomes and Physical Activity? Are More Autonomy-Supportive Relationships Necessarily Better? Sevil, Javier García-González, Luis Abós, Ángel Generelo Lanaspa, Eduardo Aibar Solana, Alberto Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The first aim of this work was to examine the independent influence of students’ perceived autonomy support for leisure-time physical activity (LTPA), from different school community agents, on motivational outcomes in a LTPA context and objective PA levels. Using both a variable- and person-centered approach, the second aim was to examine how different combinations of autonomy-support were associated with students’ motivational outcomes in a LTPA context and PA levels. A sample of 178 secondary students (M = 13.26 ± 0.64) participated in the study. Autonomy support for LTPA from the PE teacher, mother, father, and peers were the only agents that significantly and positively predicted motivational outcomes in a LTPA context and PA levels. While the two- and three-way interactions of some of these four significant sources significantly increased the explained variance of some motivational outcomes, the plots revealed that the lowest values of motivational outcomes were associated with low values of perceived autonomy support. A cluster analysis revealed five profiles. The “high autonomy support” group reported the most optimal outcomes, whereas the “low autonomy support” group showed the opposite pattern. However, mixed autonomy support profiles did not differ in any of the outcomes. The adoption of a whole-of-school approach seems decisive to empower adolescents to be active in and out of school. MDPI 2018-08-30 2018-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6163350/ /pubmed/30200200 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15091875 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sevil, Javier
García-González, Luis
Abós, Ángel
Generelo Lanaspa, Eduardo
Aibar Solana, Alberto
Which School Community Agents Influence Adolescents’ Motivational Outcomes and Physical Activity? Are More Autonomy-Supportive Relationships Necessarily Better?
title Which School Community Agents Influence Adolescents’ Motivational Outcomes and Physical Activity? Are More Autonomy-Supportive Relationships Necessarily Better?
title_full Which School Community Agents Influence Adolescents’ Motivational Outcomes and Physical Activity? Are More Autonomy-Supportive Relationships Necessarily Better?
title_fullStr Which School Community Agents Influence Adolescents’ Motivational Outcomes and Physical Activity? Are More Autonomy-Supportive Relationships Necessarily Better?
title_full_unstemmed Which School Community Agents Influence Adolescents’ Motivational Outcomes and Physical Activity? Are More Autonomy-Supportive Relationships Necessarily Better?
title_short Which School Community Agents Influence Adolescents’ Motivational Outcomes and Physical Activity? Are More Autonomy-Supportive Relationships Necessarily Better?
title_sort which school community agents influence adolescents’ motivational outcomes and physical activity? are more autonomy-supportive relationships necessarily better?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6163350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30200200
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15091875
work_keys_str_mv AT seviljavier whichschoolcommunityagentsinfluenceadolescentsmotivationaloutcomesandphysicalactivityaremoreautonomysupportiverelationshipsnecessarilybetter
AT garciagonzalezluis whichschoolcommunityagentsinfluenceadolescentsmotivationaloutcomesandphysicalactivityaremoreautonomysupportiverelationshipsnecessarilybetter
AT abosangel whichschoolcommunityagentsinfluenceadolescentsmotivationaloutcomesandphysicalactivityaremoreautonomysupportiverelationshipsnecessarilybetter
AT generelolanaspaeduardo whichschoolcommunityagentsinfluenceadolescentsmotivationaloutcomesandphysicalactivityaremoreautonomysupportiverelationshipsnecessarilybetter
AT aibarsolanaalberto whichschoolcommunityagentsinfluenceadolescentsmotivationaloutcomesandphysicalactivityaremoreautonomysupportiverelationshipsnecessarilybetter