Cargando…

Effect of Ultrafiltration of Milk Prior to Fermentation on Mass Balance and Process Efficiency in Greek-Style Yogurt Manufacture

Ultrafiltration (UF) can be used to concentrate yogurt to produce Greek-style yogurt (GSY) (UF-YOG), but this generates acid whey permeate, which is an environmental issue. However, when UF is applied before fermentation (UF-MILK), a nonacidified whey permeate is generated. For this study, two model...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paredes Valencia, Adriana, Doyen, Alain, Benoit, Scott, Margni, Manuele, Pouliot, Yves
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6164911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30181438
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods7090144
_version_ 1783359712643776512
author Paredes Valencia, Adriana
Doyen, Alain
Benoit, Scott
Margni, Manuele
Pouliot, Yves
author_facet Paredes Valencia, Adriana
Doyen, Alain
Benoit, Scott
Margni, Manuele
Pouliot, Yves
author_sort Paredes Valencia, Adriana
collection PubMed
description Ultrafiltration (UF) can be used to concentrate yogurt to produce Greek-style yogurt (GSY) (UF-YOG), but this generates acid whey permeate, which is an environmental issue. However, when UF is applied before fermentation (UF-MILK), a nonacidified whey permeate is generated. For this study, two model GSYs (UF-YOG and UF-MILK) were produced to compare the composition, UF performance, and energy consumption of the two processes. For UF-MILK, skim milk was ultrafiltered with a 30 kDa spiral-wound UF membrane to achieve a 3× volume reduction factor (VRF). The retentate was fermented to a pH of 4.5. The UF-YOG process was the same except that regular yogurt was ultrafiltered. Both GSYs had similar protein (~10%) and solid content (~17%). As expected, lactic acid/lactate was not detected in UF-MILK permeate, while 7.3 g/kg was recovered from the UF-YOG permeate. Permeation flux values (11.6 to 13.3 L m(−2) h(−1)) and total flux decline (47% to 50%) were constant during UF-MILK, whereas drastic decreases in these two membrane performance indicators (average flux: 38.5 to 10.9 L m(−2) h(−1); total flux decline: 2% to 38%) were calculated for UF-YOG. Moreover, for UF-YOG, UF membrane performance never recovered, even when drastic and repeated cleaning steps were applied. Energy consumption was 1.6 kwh/kg GSY and remained constant for UF-MILK, whereas it increased from 0.6 to 1.5 kwh/kg GSY for UF-YOG. Our results show that, although the composition of GSYs was similar for both processes, the UF step of yogurt concentration affected process efficiency due to drastic and permanent membrane fouling.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6164911
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61649112018-10-15 Effect of Ultrafiltration of Milk Prior to Fermentation on Mass Balance and Process Efficiency in Greek-Style Yogurt Manufacture Paredes Valencia, Adriana Doyen, Alain Benoit, Scott Margni, Manuele Pouliot, Yves Foods Article Ultrafiltration (UF) can be used to concentrate yogurt to produce Greek-style yogurt (GSY) (UF-YOG), but this generates acid whey permeate, which is an environmental issue. However, when UF is applied before fermentation (UF-MILK), a nonacidified whey permeate is generated. For this study, two model GSYs (UF-YOG and UF-MILK) were produced to compare the composition, UF performance, and energy consumption of the two processes. For UF-MILK, skim milk was ultrafiltered with a 30 kDa spiral-wound UF membrane to achieve a 3× volume reduction factor (VRF). The retentate was fermented to a pH of 4.5. The UF-YOG process was the same except that regular yogurt was ultrafiltered. Both GSYs had similar protein (~10%) and solid content (~17%). As expected, lactic acid/lactate was not detected in UF-MILK permeate, while 7.3 g/kg was recovered from the UF-YOG permeate. Permeation flux values (11.6 to 13.3 L m(−2) h(−1)) and total flux decline (47% to 50%) were constant during UF-MILK, whereas drastic decreases in these two membrane performance indicators (average flux: 38.5 to 10.9 L m(−2) h(−1); total flux decline: 2% to 38%) were calculated for UF-YOG. Moreover, for UF-YOG, UF membrane performance never recovered, even when drastic and repeated cleaning steps were applied. Energy consumption was 1.6 kwh/kg GSY and remained constant for UF-MILK, whereas it increased from 0.6 to 1.5 kwh/kg GSY for UF-YOG. Our results show that, although the composition of GSYs was similar for both processes, the UF step of yogurt concentration affected process efficiency due to drastic and permanent membrane fouling. MDPI 2018-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6164911/ /pubmed/30181438 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods7090144 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Paredes Valencia, Adriana
Doyen, Alain
Benoit, Scott
Margni, Manuele
Pouliot, Yves
Effect of Ultrafiltration of Milk Prior to Fermentation on Mass Balance and Process Efficiency in Greek-Style Yogurt Manufacture
title Effect of Ultrafiltration of Milk Prior to Fermentation on Mass Balance and Process Efficiency in Greek-Style Yogurt Manufacture
title_full Effect of Ultrafiltration of Milk Prior to Fermentation on Mass Balance and Process Efficiency in Greek-Style Yogurt Manufacture
title_fullStr Effect of Ultrafiltration of Milk Prior to Fermentation on Mass Balance and Process Efficiency in Greek-Style Yogurt Manufacture
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Ultrafiltration of Milk Prior to Fermentation on Mass Balance and Process Efficiency in Greek-Style Yogurt Manufacture
title_short Effect of Ultrafiltration of Milk Prior to Fermentation on Mass Balance and Process Efficiency in Greek-Style Yogurt Manufacture
title_sort effect of ultrafiltration of milk prior to fermentation on mass balance and process efficiency in greek-style yogurt manufacture
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6164911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30181438
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods7090144
work_keys_str_mv AT paredesvalenciaadriana effectofultrafiltrationofmilkpriortofermentationonmassbalanceandprocessefficiencyingreekstyleyogurtmanufacture
AT doyenalain effectofultrafiltrationofmilkpriortofermentationonmassbalanceandprocessefficiencyingreekstyleyogurtmanufacture
AT benoitscott effectofultrafiltrationofmilkpriortofermentationonmassbalanceandprocessefficiencyingreekstyleyogurtmanufacture
AT margnimanuele effectofultrafiltrationofmilkpriortofermentationonmassbalanceandprocessefficiencyingreekstyleyogurtmanufacture
AT pouliotyves effectofultrafiltrationofmilkpriortofermentationonmassbalanceandprocessefficiencyingreekstyleyogurtmanufacture