Cargando…

Revising the motivation and confidence domain of the Canadian assessment of physical literacy

BACKGROUND: The Motivation and Confidence domain questionnaire in the Canadian Assessment of Physical Literacy (CAPL) was lengthy (36 single items that aggregate to five subscales), and thus burdensome to both participants and practitioners. The purpose of this study was to use factor analysis to re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gunnell, Katie E., Longmuir, Patricia E., Woodruff, Sarah J., Barnes, Joel D., Belanger, Kevin, Tremblay, Mark S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6167763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30285796
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5900-0
_version_ 1783360252107816960
author Gunnell, Katie E.
Longmuir, Patricia E.
Woodruff, Sarah J.
Barnes, Joel D.
Belanger, Kevin
Tremblay, Mark S.
author_facet Gunnell, Katie E.
Longmuir, Patricia E.
Woodruff, Sarah J.
Barnes, Joel D.
Belanger, Kevin
Tremblay, Mark S.
author_sort Gunnell, Katie E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Motivation and Confidence domain questionnaire in the Canadian Assessment of Physical Literacy (CAPL) was lengthy (36 single items that aggregate to five subscales), and thus burdensome to both participants and practitioners. The purpose of this study was to use factor analysis to refine the Motivation and Confidence domain to be used in the CAPL–Second Edition (CAPL-2). METHODS: Children, primarily recruited through free-of-charge summer day camps (n = 205, M(age) = 9.50 years, SD = 1.14, 50.7% girls), completed the CAPL-2 protocol, and two survey versions of the Motivation and Confidence questionnaire. Survey 1 contained the Motivation and Confidence questionnaire items from the original CAPL, whereas Survey 2 contained a battery of items informed by self-determination theory to assess motivation and confidence. First, factor analyses were performed on individual questionnaires to examine validity evidence (i.e., internal structure) and score reliability (i.e., coefficient H and omega total). Second, factor analyses were performed on different combinations of questionnaires to establish the least burdensome yet well-fitted and theoretically aligned model. RESULTS: The assessment of adequacy and predilection, based on 16 single items as originally conceptualized within the CAPL, was not a good fit to the data. Therefore, a revised and shorter version of these scales was proposed, based on exploratory factor analysis. The self-determination theory items provided a good fit to the data; however, identified, introjected, and external regulation had low score reliability. Overall, a model comprising three single items for each of the following subscales was proposed for use within the CAPL-2: adequacy, predilection, intrinsic motivation, and perceived competence satisfaction. This revised domain fit well within the overall CAPL-2 model specifying a higher-order physical literacy factor (MLRχ(2)((63)) = 81.45, p = 0.06, CFI = 0.908, RMSEA = 0.038, 90% CI (0.00, 0.060)). CONCLUSIONS: The revised and much shorter questionnaire of 12 items that aggregate to four subscales within the domain of Motivation and Confidence is recommended for use in the CAPL-2. The revised domain is aligned with the definition of motivation and confidence within physical literacy and has clearer instructions for completion. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-018-5900-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6167763
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61677632018-10-09 Revising the motivation and confidence domain of the Canadian assessment of physical literacy Gunnell, Katie E. Longmuir, Patricia E. Woodruff, Sarah J. Barnes, Joel D. Belanger, Kevin Tremblay, Mark S. BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: The Motivation and Confidence domain questionnaire in the Canadian Assessment of Physical Literacy (CAPL) was lengthy (36 single items that aggregate to five subscales), and thus burdensome to both participants and practitioners. The purpose of this study was to use factor analysis to refine the Motivation and Confidence domain to be used in the CAPL–Second Edition (CAPL-2). METHODS: Children, primarily recruited through free-of-charge summer day camps (n = 205, M(age) = 9.50 years, SD = 1.14, 50.7% girls), completed the CAPL-2 protocol, and two survey versions of the Motivation and Confidence questionnaire. Survey 1 contained the Motivation and Confidence questionnaire items from the original CAPL, whereas Survey 2 contained a battery of items informed by self-determination theory to assess motivation and confidence. First, factor analyses were performed on individual questionnaires to examine validity evidence (i.e., internal structure) and score reliability (i.e., coefficient H and omega total). Second, factor analyses were performed on different combinations of questionnaires to establish the least burdensome yet well-fitted and theoretically aligned model. RESULTS: The assessment of adequacy and predilection, based on 16 single items as originally conceptualized within the CAPL, was not a good fit to the data. Therefore, a revised and shorter version of these scales was proposed, based on exploratory factor analysis. The self-determination theory items provided a good fit to the data; however, identified, introjected, and external regulation had low score reliability. Overall, a model comprising three single items for each of the following subscales was proposed for use within the CAPL-2: adequacy, predilection, intrinsic motivation, and perceived competence satisfaction. This revised domain fit well within the overall CAPL-2 model specifying a higher-order physical literacy factor (MLRχ(2)((63)) = 81.45, p = 0.06, CFI = 0.908, RMSEA = 0.038, 90% CI (0.00, 0.060)). CONCLUSIONS: The revised and much shorter questionnaire of 12 items that aggregate to four subscales within the domain of Motivation and Confidence is recommended for use in the CAPL-2. The revised domain is aligned with the definition of motivation and confidence within physical literacy and has clearer instructions for completion. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-018-5900-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6167763/ /pubmed/30285796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5900-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Gunnell, Katie E.
Longmuir, Patricia E.
Woodruff, Sarah J.
Barnes, Joel D.
Belanger, Kevin
Tremblay, Mark S.
Revising the motivation and confidence domain of the Canadian assessment of physical literacy
title Revising the motivation and confidence domain of the Canadian assessment of physical literacy
title_full Revising the motivation and confidence domain of the Canadian assessment of physical literacy
title_fullStr Revising the motivation and confidence domain of the Canadian assessment of physical literacy
title_full_unstemmed Revising the motivation and confidence domain of the Canadian assessment of physical literacy
title_short Revising the motivation and confidence domain of the Canadian assessment of physical literacy
title_sort revising the motivation and confidence domain of the canadian assessment of physical literacy
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6167763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30285796
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5900-0
work_keys_str_mv AT gunnellkatiee revisingthemotivationandconfidencedomainofthecanadianassessmentofphysicalliteracy
AT longmuirpatriciae revisingthemotivationandconfidencedomainofthecanadianassessmentofphysicalliteracy
AT woodruffsarahj revisingthemotivationandconfidencedomainofthecanadianassessmentofphysicalliteracy
AT barnesjoeld revisingthemotivationandconfidencedomainofthecanadianassessmentofphysicalliteracy
AT belangerkevin revisingthemotivationandconfidencedomainofthecanadianassessmentofphysicalliteracy
AT tremblaymarks revisingthemotivationandconfidencedomainofthecanadianassessmentofphysicalliteracy