Cargando…
Impact of Case-Specific Education and Face-to-Face Feedback to Prescribers and Nurses in the Management of Hospitalized Patients With a Positive Clostridium difficile Test
BACKGROUND: Approaches to changing providers’ behavior around Clostridium difficile (CD) management are needed. We hypothesized that case-specific teaching points and face-to-face discussions with prescribers and nurses would improve management of patients with a positive CD test. METHODS: Charts of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6168707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30302353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy226 |
_version_ | 1783360409061818368 |
---|---|
author | Fabre, Valeria Markou, Theodore Sick-Samuels, Anna Rock, Clare Avdic, Edina Shulder, Stephanie Dzintars, Kathryn Saunders, Heather Andonian, Jennifer Cosgrove, Sara E |
author_facet | Fabre, Valeria Markou, Theodore Sick-Samuels, Anna Rock, Clare Avdic, Edina Shulder, Stephanie Dzintars, Kathryn Saunders, Heather Andonian, Jennifer Cosgrove, Sara E |
author_sort | Fabre, Valeria |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Approaches to changing providers’ behavior around Clostridium difficile (CD) management are needed. We hypothesized that case-specific teaching points and face-to-face discussions with prescribers and nurses would improve management of patients with a positive CD test. METHODS: Charts of patients age ≥18 years with positive CD tests hospitalized July 2016 to May 2017 were prospectively reviewed to assess CD practices and generate management recommendations. The study had 4 periods: baseline (pre-intervention), intervention #1, observation, and intervention #2. Both interventions consisted of an in-person, real-time, case-based discussion and education by a CD Action Team (CDAT). Assessment occurred within 24 hours of a positive CD test for all periods; during the intervention periods, management was also assessed within 48 hours after CDAT-delivered recommendations. Outcomes included proportion of patients receiving optimized treatment and incidence rate ratios of practice changes (both CDAT-prompted and CDAT-independent). RESULTS: Overall, the CDAT made recommendations to 84 of 96 CD cases during intervention periods, and providers accepted 43% of CDAT recommendations. The implementation of the CDAT led to significant improvement in bowel movement (BM) documentation, use of proton pump inhibitors, and antibiotic selection for non-CD infections. Selection of CD-specific therapy improved only in the first intervention period. Laxative use and treatment of CD colonization cases remained unchanged. Only BM documentation, a nurse-driven task, was sustained independent of CDAT prompting. CONCLUSIONS: A behavioral approach to changing the management of positive CD tests led to self-sustained practice changes among nurses but not physicians. Better understanding of prescribers’ decision-making is needed to devise enduring interventions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6168707 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61687072018-10-09 Impact of Case-Specific Education and Face-to-Face Feedback to Prescribers and Nurses in the Management of Hospitalized Patients With a Positive Clostridium difficile Test Fabre, Valeria Markou, Theodore Sick-Samuels, Anna Rock, Clare Avdic, Edina Shulder, Stephanie Dzintars, Kathryn Saunders, Heather Andonian, Jennifer Cosgrove, Sara E Open Forum Infect Dis Major Article BACKGROUND: Approaches to changing providers’ behavior around Clostridium difficile (CD) management are needed. We hypothesized that case-specific teaching points and face-to-face discussions with prescribers and nurses would improve management of patients with a positive CD test. METHODS: Charts of patients age ≥18 years with positive CD tests hospitalized July 2016 to May 2017 were prospectively reviewed to assess CD practices and generate management recommendations. The study had 4 periods: baseline (pre-intervention), intervention #1, observation, and intervention #2. Both interventions consisted of an in-person, real-time, case-based discussion and education by a CD Action Team (CDAT). Assessment occurred within 24 hours of a positive CD test for all periods; during the intervention periods, management was also assessed within 48 hours after CDAT-delivered recommendations. Outcomes included proportion of patients receiving optimized treatment and incidence rate ratios of practice changes (both CDAT-prompted and CDAT-independent). RESULTS: Overall, the CDAT made recommendations to 84 of 96 CD cases during intervention periods, and providers accepted 43% of CDAT recommendations. The implementation of the CDAT led to significant improvement in bowel movement (BM) documentation, use of proton pump inhibitors, and antibiotic selection for non-CD infections. Selection of CD-specific therapy improved only in the first intervention period. Laxative use and treatment of CD colonization cases remained unchanged. Only BM documentation, a nurse-driven task, was sustained independent of CDAT prompting. CONCLUSIONS: A behavioral approach to changing the management of positive CD tests led to self-sustained practice changes among nurses but not physicians. Better understanding of prescribers’ decision-making is needed to devise enduring interventions. Oxford University Press 2018-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6168707/ /pubmed/30302353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy226 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Major Article Fabre, Valeria Markou, Theodore Sick-Samuels, Anna Rock, Clare Avdic, Edina Shulder, Stephanie Dzintars, Kathryn Saunders, Heather Andonian, Jennifer Cosgrove, Sara E Impact of Case-Specific Education and Face-to-Face Feedback to Prescribers and Nurses in the Management of Hospitalized Patients With a Positive Clostridium difficile Test |
title | Impact of Case-Specific Education and Face-to-Face Feedback to Prescribers and Nurses in the Management of Hospitalized Patients With a Positive Clostridium difficile Test |
title_full | Impact of Case-Specific Education and Face-to-Face Feedback to Prescribers and Nurses in the Management of Hospitalized Patients With a Positive Clostridium difficile Test |
title_fullStr | Impact of Case-Specific Education and Face-to-Face Feedback to Prescribers and Nurses in the Management of Hospitalized Patients With a Positive Clostridium difficile Test |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of Case-Specific Education and Face-to-Face Feedback to Prescribers and Nurses in the Management of Hospitalized Patients With a Positive Clostridium difficile Test |
title_short | Impact of Case-Specific Education and Face-to-Face Feedback to Prescribers and Nurses in the Management of Hospitalized Patients With a Positive Clostridium difficile Test |
title_sort | impact of case-specific education and face-to-face feedback to prescribers and nurses in the management of hospitalized patients with a positive clostridium difficile test |
topic | Major Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6168707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30302353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy226 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fabrevaleria impactofcasespecificeducationandfacetofacefeedbacktoprescribersandnursesinthemanagementofhospitalizedpatientswithapositiveclostridiumdifficiletest AT markoutheodore impactofcasespecificeducationandfacetofacefeedbacktoprescribersandnursesinthemanagementofhospitalizedpatientswithapositiveclostridiumdifficiletest AT sicksamuelsanna impactofcasespecificeducationandfacetofacefeedbacktoprescribersandnursesinthemanagementofhospitalizedpatientswithapositiveclostridiumdifficiletest AT rockclare impactofcasespecificeducationandfacetofacefeedbacktoprescribersandnursesinthemanagementofhospitalizedpatientswithapositiveclostridiumdifficiletest AT avdicedina impactofcasespecificeducationandfacetofacefeedbacktoprescribersandnursesinthemanagementofhospitalizedpatientswithapositiveclostridiumdifficiletest AT shulderstephanie impactofcasespecificeducationandfacetofacefeedbacktoprescribersandnursesinthemanagementofhospitalizedpatientswithapositiveclostridiumdifficiletest AT dzintarskathryn impactofcasespecificeducationandfacetofacefeedbacktoprescribersandnursesinthemanagementofhospitalizedpatientswithapositiveclostridiumdifficiletest AT saundersheather impactofcasespecificeducationandfacetofacefeedbacktoprescribersandnursesinthemanagementofhospitalizedpatientswithapositiveclostridiumdifficiletest AT andonianjennifer impactofcasespecificeducationandfacetofacefeedbacktoprescribersandnursesinthemanagementofhospitalizedpatientswithapositiveclostridiumdifficiletest AT cosgrovesarae impactofcasespecificeducationandfacetofacefeedbacktoprescribersandnursesinthemanagementofhospitalizedpatientswithapositiveclostridiumdifficiletest |