Cargando…

The Net Promoter Score (NPS) for Insight Into Client Experiences in Sexual and Reproductive Health Clinics

The Net Promoter Score (NPS) metric, commonly used by Fortune 500 companies to measure the customer experience, is calculated using a 0-to-10 scale to answer 1 question: “How likely is it that you would recommend [company X] to a friend or colleague?” Despite the value of this methodology as a predi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koladycz, Rebecca, Fernandez, Gwendolyn, Gray, Kate, Marriott, Heidi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Global Health: Science and Practice 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6172123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30072372
http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-18-00068
_version_ 1783360880805675008
author Koladycz, Rebecca
Fernandez, Gwendolyn
Gray, Kate
Marriott, Heidi
author_facet Koladycz, Rebecca
Fernandez, Gwendolyn
Gray, Kate
Marriott, Heidi
author_sort Koladycz, Rebecca
collection PubMed
description The Net Promoter Score (NPS) metric, commonly used by Fortune 500 companies to measure the customer experience, is calculated using a 0-to-10 scale to answer 1 question: “How likely is it that you would recommend [company X] to a friend or colleague?” Despite the value of this methodology as a predictor of growth and indicator of customer satisfaction in for-profit industries, uptake of the NPS has been slower in the social sector due to concerns about its applicability and acceptability in noncommercial settings, particularly among low-literacy populations. To address these concerns, we conducted a series of small-scale pilots in El Salvador, India, Kenya, and Nigeria to test different implementation approaches of the NPS in sexual and reproductive health clinics—including face-to-face interviews, a guided drop box, integration of the NPS question into an existing client exit interview, and self-administered and volunteer-assisted online surveys using tablets in clinics—and compared the traditional 0-to-10 number scale with an emoji-face scale. Findings showed that the NPS can be effectively adapted for use in low-resource health clinics among low-literacy clients using the number scale. There was no statistically significant difference in mean likeliness to recommend services when using the emoji versus numerical scales in India; however, there was a statistically significant difference when using the guided drop box approach versus face-to-face interviews. When combined with demographic and service-use questions, the NPS generated useful insights on client groups that were more or less likely to recommend the services. While providing an online survey on tablets can be an efficient methodology for implementing the NPS, self-administered approaches may be limited by a client's level of literacy or comfort with technology. For those client populations with a lower NPS, we advise using a qualitative feedback process that can elicit critical feedback to identify actions to improve their experience. Our experience with testing and implementing the NPS in SRH clinics in diverse settings suggests it is a promising approach to gaining insight into the client experience in nonprofit health care settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6172123
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Global Health: Science and Practice
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61721232018-10-21 The Net Promoter Score (NPS) for Insight Into Client Experiences in Sexual and Reproductive Health Clinics Koladycz, Rebecca Fernandez, Gwendolyn Gray, Kate Marriott, Heidi Glob Health Sci Pract Original Articles The Net Promoter Score (NPS) metric, commonly used by Fortune 500 companies to measure the customer experience, is calculated using a 0-to-10 scale to answer 1 question: “How likely is it that you would recommend [company X] to a friend or colleague?” Despite the value of this methodology as a predictor of growth and indicator of customer satisfaction in for-profit industries, uptake of the NPS has been slower in the social sector due to concerns about its applicability and acceptability in noncommercial settings, particularly among low-literacy populations. To address these concerns, we conducted a series of small-scale pilots in El Salvador, India, Kenya, and Nigeria to test different implementation approaches of the NPS in sexual and reproductive health clinics—including face-to-face interviews, a guided drop box, integration of the NPS question into an existing client exit interview, and self-administered and volunteer-assisted online surveys using tablets in clinics—and compared the traditional 0-to-10 number scale with an emoji-face scale. Findings showed that the NPS can be effectively adapted for use in low-resource health clinics among low-literacy clients using the number scale. There was no statistically significant difference in mean likeliness to recommend services when using the emoji versus numerical scales in India; however, there was a statistically significant difference when using the guided drop box approach versus face-to-face interviews. When combined with demographic and service-use questions, the NPS generated useful insights on client groups that were more or less likely to recommend the services. While providing an online survey on tablets can be an efficient methodology for implementing the NPS, self-administered approaches may be limited by a client's level of literacy or comfort with technology. For those client populations with a lower NPS, we advise using a qualitative feedback process that can elicit critical feedback to identify actions to improve their experience. Our experience with testing and implementing the NPS in SRH clinics in diverse settings suggests it is a promising approach to gaining insight into the client experience in nonprofit health care settings. Global Health: Science and Practice 2018-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6172123/ /pubmed/30072372 http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-18-00068 Text en © Koladycz et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited. To view a copy of the license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. When linking to this article, please use the following permanent link: https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-18-00068
spellingShingle Original Articles
Koladycz, Rebecca
Fernandez, Gwendolyn
Gray, Kate
Marriott, Heidi
The Net Promoter Score (NPS) for Insight Into Client Experiences in Sexual and Reproductive Health Clinics
title The Net Promoter Score (NPS) for Insight Into Client Experiences in Sexual and Reproductive Health Clinics
title_full The Net Promoter Score (NPS) for Insight Into Client Experiences in Sexual and Reproductive Health Clinics
title_fullStr The Net Promoter Score (NPS) for Insight Into Client Experiences in Sexual and Reproductive Health Clinics
title_full_unstemmed The Net Promoter Score (NPS) for Insight Into Client Experiences in Sexual and Reproductive Health Clinics
title_short The Net Promoter Score (NPS) for Insight Into Client Experiences in Sexual and Reproductive Health Clinics
title_sort net promoter score (nps) for insight into client experiences in sexual and reproductive health clinics
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6172123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30072372
http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-18-00068
work_keys_str_mv AT koladyczrebecca thenetpromoterscorenpsforinsightintoclientexperiencesinsexualandreproductivehealthclinics
AT fernandezgwendolyn thenetpromoterscorenpsforinsightintoclientexperiencesinsexualandreproductivehealthclinics
AT graykate thenetpromoterscorenpsforinsightintoclientexperiencesinsexualandreproductivehealthclinics
AT marriottheidi thenetpromoterscorenpsforinsightintoclientexperiencesinsexualandreproductivehealthclinics
AT koladyczrebecca netpromoterscorenpsforinsightintoclientexperiencesinsexualandreproductivehealthclinics
AT fernandezgwendolyn netpromoterscorenpsforinsightintoclientexperiencesinsexualandreproductivehealthclinics
AT graykate netpromoterscorenpsforinsightintoclientexperiencesinsexualandreproductivehealthclinics
AT marriottheidi netpromoterscorenpsforinsightintoclientexperiencesinsexualandreproductivehealthclinics