Cargando…
A retrospective qualitative evaluation of barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a school-based running programme
BACKGROUND: There is growing interest in school-based interventions which deliver opportunities for additional physical activity time outside of physical education (PE). A practical and cost-effective approach may be school running programmes. Consequently, many school-based running initiatives are...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6196020/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30342500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6078-1 |
_version_ | 1783364498888851456 |
---|---|
author | Chalkley, Anna E. Routen, Ash C. Harris, Jo P. Cale, Lorraine A. Gorely, Trish Sherar, Lauren B. |
author_facet | Chalkley, Anna E. Routen, Ash C. Harris, Jo P. Cale, Lorraine A. Gorely, Trish Sherar, Lauren B. |
author_sort | Chalkley, Anna E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is growing interest in school-based interventions which deliver opportunities for additional physical activity time outside of physical education (PE). A practical and cost-effective approach may be school running programmes. Consequently, many school-based running initiatives are currently being implemented in a grass-roots style movement across the UK. However, research on the implementation of physical activity programmes in schools is notably underdeveloped. Therefore, this qualitative study aimed to better understand the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a running programme, Marathon Kids (MK), within primary schools in England. METHODS: Two sets of semi-structured interviews were conducted, the first with each of the three core members of staff responsible for MK, and the second with each of the MK school staff Champions from 20 primary schools. Also, nine focus groups were conducted with 55 pupils (6–10 years) from five of the schools; all were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Three themes were identified surrounding the barriers and facilitators to implementation: features of the programme (e.g. ethos and resources), school climate (e.g. culture; whole school engagement; PE and physical activity policies and goals; and physical environment) and programme implementation decisions (e.g. aspirations and planning and sustainability). CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that the barriers and facilitators to implementation are wide-ranging and include programme, organisational and system-level factors. Collectively pointing towards the need for a preparation period before implementation to understand schools’ readiness to implement and context-specific factors, both regarding organisational capacity and programme specific capacity. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-018-6078-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6196020 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61960202018-10-30 A retrospective qualitative evaluation of barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a school-based running programme Chalkley, Anna E. Routen, Ash C. Harris, Jo P. Cale, Lorraine A. Gorely, Trish Sherar, Lauren B. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: There is growing interest in school-based interventions which deliver opportunities for additional physical activity time outside of physical education (PE). A practical and cost-effective approach may be school running programmes. Consequently, many school-based running initiatives are currently being implemented in a grass-roots style movement across the UK. However, research on the implementation of physical activity programmes in schools is notably underdeveloped. Therefore, this qualitative study aimed to better understand the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a running programme, Marathon Kids (MK), within primary schools in England. METHODS: Two sets of semi-structured interviews were conducted, the first with each of the three core members of staff responsible for MK, and the second with each of the MK school staff Champions from 20 primary schools. Also, nine focus groups were conducted with 55 pupils (6–10 years) from five of the schools; all were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Three themes were identified surrounding the barriers and facilitators to implementation: features of the programme (e.g. ethos and resources), school climate (e.g. culture; whole school engagement; PE and physical activity policies and goals; and physical environment) and programme implementation decisions (e.g. aspirations and planning and sustainability). CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that the barriers and facilitators to implementation are wide-ranging and include programme, organisational and system-level factors. Collectively pointing towards the need for a preparation period before implementation to understand schools’ readiness to implement and context-specific factors, both regarding organisational capacity and programme specific capacity. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-018-6078-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6196020/ /pubmed/30342500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6078-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Chalkley, Anna E. Routen, Ash C. Harris, Jo P. Cale, Lorraine A. Gorely, Trish Sherar, Lauren B. A retrospective qualitative evaluation of barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a school-based running programme |
title | A retrospective qualitative evaluation of barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a school-based running programme |
title_full | A retrospective qualitative evaluation of barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a school-based running programme |
title_fullStr | A retrospective qualitative evaluation of barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a school-based running programme |
title_full_unstemmed | A retrospective qualitative evaluation of barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a school-based running programme |
title_short | A retrospective qualitative evaluation of barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a school-based running programme |
title_sort | retrospective qualitative evaluation of barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a school-based running programme |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6196020/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30342500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6078-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chalkleyannae aretrospectivequalitativeevaluationofbarriersandfacilitatorstotheimplementationofaschoolbasedrunningprogramme AT routenashc aretrospectivequalitativeevaluationofbarriersandfacilitatorstotheimplementationofaschoolbasedrunningprogramme AT harrisjop aretrospectivequalitativeevaluationofbarriersandfacilitatorstotheimplementationofaschoolbasedrunningprogramme AT calelorrainea aretrospectivequalitativeevaluationofbarriersandfacilitatorstotheimplementationofaschoolbasedrunningprogramme AT gorelytrish aretrospectivequalitativeevaluationofbarriersandfacilitatorstotheimplementationofaschoolbasedrunningprogramme AT sherarlaurenb aretrospectivequalitativeevaluationofbarriersandfacilitatorstotheimplementationofaschoolbasedrunningprogramme AT chalkleyannae retrospectivequalitativeevaluationofbarriersandfacilitatorstotheimplementationofaschoolbasedrunningprogramme AT routenashc retrospectivequalitativeevaluationofbarriersandfacilitatorstotheimplementationofaschoolbasedrunningprogramme AT harrisjop retrospectivequalitativeevaluationofbarriersandfacilitatorstotheimplementationofaschoolbasedrunningprogramme AT calelorrainea retrospectivequalitativeevaluationofbarriersandfacilitatorstotheimplementationofaschoolbasedrunningprogramme AT gorelytrish retrospectivequalitativeevaluationofbarriersandfacilitatorstotheimplementationofaschoolbasedrunningprogramme AT sherarlaurenb retrospectivequalitativeevaluationofbarriersandfacilitatorstotheimplementationofaschoolbasedrunningprogramme |