Cargando…

Does Extreme Language Control Training Improve Cognitive Control? A Comparison of Professional Interpreters, L2 Teachers and Monolinguals

There is currently a lively debate in the literature whether bilingualism leads to enhanced cognitive control or not. Recent evidence suggests that knowledge of more than one language does not always suffice for the manifestation of a bilingual cognitive control advantage. As a result, ongoing resea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Van der Linden, Lize, Van de Putte, Eowyn, Woumans, Evy, Duyck, Wouter, Szmalec, Arnaud
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6206226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30405488
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01998
_version_ 1783366331440037888
author Van der Linden, Lize
Van de Putte, Eowyn
Woumans, Evy
Duyck, Wouter
Szmalec, Arnaud
author_facet Van der Linden, Lize
Van de Putte, Eowyn
Woumans, Evy
Duyck, Wouter
Szmalec, Arnaud
author_sort Van der Linden, Lize
collection PubMed
description There is currently a lively debate in the literature whether bilingualism leads to enhanced cognitive control or not. Recent evidence suggests that knowledge of more than one language does not always suffice for the manifestation of a bilingual cognitive control advantage. As a result, ongoing research has focused on modalities of bilingual language use that may interact with the bilingual advantage. In this study, we explored the cognitive control performance of simultaneous interpreters. These highly proficient bilinguals comprehend information in one language while producing in the other language, which is a complex skill requiring high levels of language control. In a first experiment, we compared professional interpreters to monolinguals. Data were collected on interference suppression (flanker task), prepotent response inhibition (Simon task), and short-term memory (digit span task). The results showed that the professional interpreters performed similarly to the monolinguals on all measures. In Experiment 2, we compared professional interpreters to monolinguals and second language teachers. Data were collected on interference suppression (advanced flanker task), prepotent response inhibition (advanced flanker task), attention (advanced flanker task), short-term memory (Hebb repetition paradigm), and updating (n-back task). We found converging evidence for our finding that experience in interpreting may not lead to superior interference suppression, prepotent response inhibition, and short-term memory. In fact, our results showed that the professional interpreters performed similarly to both the monolinguals and the second language teachers on all tested cognitive control measures. We did, however, find anecdotal evidence for a (small) advantage in short-term memory for interpreters relative to monolinguals when analyzing composite scores of both experiments together. Taken together, the results of the current study suggest that interpreter experience does not necessarily lead to general cognitive control advantages. However, there may be small interpreter advantages in short-term memory, suggesting that this might be an important cognitive control aspect of simultaneous interpreting. The results are discussed in the light of ongoing debates about bilingual cognitive control advantages.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6206226
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62062262018-11-07 Does Extreme Language Control Training Improve Cognitive Control? A Comparison of Professional Interpreters, L2 Teachers and Monolinguals Van der Linden, Lize Van de Putte, Eowyn Woumans, Evy Duyck, Wouter Szmalec, Arnaud Front Psychol Psychology There is currently a lively debate in the literature whether bilingualism leads to enhanced cognitive control or not. Recent evidence suggests that knowledge of more than one language does not always suffice for the manifestation of a bilingual cognitive control advantage. As a result, ongoing research has focused on modalities of bilingual language use that may interact with the bilingual advantage. In this study, we explored the cognitive control performance of simultaneous interpreters. These highly proficient bilinguals comprehend information in one language while producing in the other language, which is a complex skill requiring high levels of language control. In a first experiment, we compared professional interpreters to monolinguals. Data were collected on interference suppression (flanker task), prepotent response inhibition (Simon task), and short-term memory (digit span task). The results showed that the professional interpreters performed similarly to the monolinguals on all measures. In Experiment 2, we compared professional interpreters to monolinguals and second language teachers. Data were collected on interference suppression (advanced flanker task), prepotent response inhibition (advanced flanker task), attention (advanced flanker task), short-term memory (Hebb repetition paradigm), and updating (n-back task). We found converging evidence for our finding that experience in interpreting may not lead to superior interference suppression, prepotent response inhibition, and short-term memory. In fact, our results showed that the professional interpreters performed similarly to both the monolinguals and the second language teachers on all tested cognitive control measures. We did, however, find anecdotal evidence for a (small) advantage in short-term memory for interpreters relative to monolinguals when analyzing composite scores of both experiments together. Taken together, the results of the current study suggest that interpreter experience does not necessarily lead to general cognitive control advantages. However, there may be small interpreter advantages in short-term memory, suggesting that this might be an important cognitive control aspect of simultaneous interpreting. The results are discussed in the light of ongoing debates about bilingual cognitive control advantages. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6206226/ /pubmed/30405488 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01998 Text en Copyright © 2018 Van der Linden, Van de Putte, Woumans, Duyck and Szmalec. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Van der Linden, Lize
Van de Putte, Eowyn
Woumans, Evy
Duyck, Wouter
Szmalec, Arnaud
Does Extreme Language Control Training Improve Cognitive Control? A Comparison of Professional Interpreters, L2 Teachers and Monolinguals
title Does Extreme Language Control Training Improve Cognitive Control? A Comparison of Professional Interpreters, L2 Teachers and Monolinguals
title_full Does Extreme Language Control Training Improve Cognitive Control? A Comparison of Professional Interpreters, L2 Teachers and Monolinguals
title_fullStr Does Extreme Language Control Training Improve Cognitive Control? A Comparison of Professional Interpreters, L2 Teachers and Monolinguals
title_full_unstemmed Does Extreme Language Control Training Improve Cognitive Control? A Comparison of Professional Interpreters, L2 Teachers and Monolinguals
title_short Does Extreme Language Control Training Improve Cognitive Control? A Comparison of Professional Interpreters, L2 Teachers and Monolinguals
title_sort does extreme language control training improve cognitive control? a comparison of professional interpreters, l2 teachers and monolinguals
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6206226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30405488
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01998
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderlindenlize doesextremelanguagecontroltrainingimprovecognitivecontrolacomparisonofprofessionalinterpretersl2teachersandmonolinguals
AT vandeputteeowyn doesextremelanguagecontroltrainingimprovecognitivecontrolacomparisonofprofessionalinterpretersl2teachersandmonolinguals
AT woumansevy doesextremelanguagecontroltrainingimprovecognitivecontrolacomparisonofprofessionalinterpretersl2teachersandmonolinguals
AT duyckwouter doesextremelanguagecontroltrainingimprovecognitivecontrolacomparisonofprofessionalinterpretersl2teachersandmonolinguals
AT szmalecarnaud doesextremelanguagecontroltrainingimprovecognitivecontrolacomparisonofprofessionalinterpretersl2teachersandmonolinguals