Cargando…

Post-Exercise Appetite and Ad Libitum Energy Intake in Response to High-Intensity Interval Training versus Moderate- or Vigorous-Intensity Continuous Training among Physically Inactive Middle-Aged Adults

High-intensity interval training (HIIT) is considered a time-efficient exercise strategy for weight management. However, data regarding the acute appetite and energy intake responses to HIIT versus continuous training remain inconclusive. This study investigated the ad libitum energy intake and appe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Poon, Eric Tsz-Chun, Sun, Feng-Hua, Chung, Anthony Pui-Wan, Wong, Stephen Heung-Sang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6213307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30279345
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu10101408
_version_ 1783367737768148992
author Poon, Eric Tsz-Chun
Sun, Feng-Hua
Chung, Anthony Pui-Wan
Wong, Stephen Heung-Sang
author_facet Poon, Eric Tsz-Chun
Sun, Feng-Hua
Chung, Anthony Pui-Wan
Wong, Stephen Heung-Sang
author_sort Poon, Eric Tsz-Chun
collection PubMed
description High-intensity interval training (HIIT) is considered a time-efficient exercise strategy for weight management. However, data regarding the acute appetite and energy intake responses to HIIT versus continuous training remain inconclusive. This study investigated the ad libitum energy intake and appetite responses to a single session of HIIT versus moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) and vigorous-intensity continuous training (VICT). Using a randomized crossover design, 11 middle-aged physically inactive men (45.7 ± 7.4 years, 23.5 ± 2.1 kg m(−2)) participated in three treadmill trials at 7-day intervals. HIIT comprised 10 1-min periods at 100% VO(2max) interspersed with 1-min periods of active recovery. MICT comprised a 40-min session at 65% VO(2max), while VICT comprised a 20-min session at 80% VO(2max). After each trial, the participants consumed an ad libitum buffet meal for which the energy intake was recorded. The participants’ perceived appetite was assessed before and after exercise sessions using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). No significant differences in post-exercise ad libitum energy intake were observed between trials (HIIT: 645 ± 262.9 kcal; MICT: 614.7 ± 271.2 kcal; VICT: 623.1 ± 249.0 kcal, p > 0.05). Although the perceived appetite responses exhibited a significant main effect of time (p < 0.01), no group differences were observed (p > 0.05). In summary, these findings suggest that the interval or continuous nature of exercise has no significant effect on appetite responses in physically inactive middle-aged adults, at least during the short-term post-exercise period.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6213307
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62133072018-11-06 Post-Exercise Appetite and Ad Libitum Energy Intake in Response to High-Intensity Interval Training versus Moderate- or Vigorous-Intensity Continuous Training among Physically Inactive Middle-Aged Adults Poon, Eric Tsz-Chun Sun, Feng-Hua Chung, Anthony Pui-Wan Wong, Stephen Heung-Sang Nutrients Article High-intensity interval training (HIIT) is considered a time-efficient exercise strategy for weight management. However, data regarding the acute appetite and energy intake responses to HIIT versus continuous training remain inconclusive. This study investigated the ad libitum energy intake and appetite responses to a single session of HIIT versus moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) and vigorous-intensity continuous training (VICT). Using a randomized crossover design, 11 middle-aged physically inactive men (45.7 ± 7.4 years, 23.5 ± 2.1 kg m(−2)) participated in three treadmill trials at 7-day intervals. HIIT comprised 10 1-min periods at 100% VO(2max) interspersed with 1-min periods of active recovery. MICT comprised a 40-min session at 65% VO(2max), while VICT comprised a 20-min session at 80% VO(2max). After each trial, the participants consumed an ad libitum buffet meal for which the energy intake was recorded. The participants’ perceived appetite was assessed before and after exercise sessions using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). No significant differences in post-exercise ad libitum energy intake were observed between trials (HIIT: 645 ± 262.9 kcal; MICT: 614.7 ± 271.2 kcal; VICT: 623.1 ± 249.0 kcal, p > 0.05). Although the perceived appetite responses exhibited a significant main effect of time (p < 0.01), no group differences were observed (p > 0.05). In summary, these findings suggest that the interval or continuous nature of exercise has no significant effect on appetite responses in physically inactive middle-aged adults, at least during the short-term post-exercise period. MDPI 2018-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6213307/ /pubmed/30279345 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu10101408 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Poon, Eric Tsz-Chun
Sun, Feng-Hua
Chung, Anthony Pui-Wan
Wong, Stephen Heung-Sang
Post-Exercise Appetite and Ad Libitum Energy Intake in Response to High-Intensity Interval Training versus Moderate- or Vigorous-Intensity Continuous Training among Physically Inactive Middle-Aged Adults
title Post-Exercise Appetite and Ad Libitum Energy Intake in Response to High-Intensity Interval Training versus Moderate- or Vigorous-Intensity Continuous Training among Physically Inactive Middle-Aged Adults
title_full Post-Exercise Appetite and Ad Libitum Energy Intake in Response to High-Intensity Interval Training versus Moderate- or Vigorous-Intensity Continuous Training among Physically Inactive Middle-Aged Adults
title_fullStr Post-Exercise Appetite and Ad Libitum Energy Intake in Response to High-Intensity Interval Training versus Moderate- or Vigorous-Intensity Continuous Training among Physically Inactive Middle-Aged Adults
title_full_unstemmed Post-Exercise Appetite and Ad Libitum Energy Intake in Response to High-Intensity Interval Training versus Moderate- or Vigorous-Intensity Continuous Training among Physically Inactive Middle-Aged Adults
title_short Post-Exercise Appetite and Ad Libitum Energy Intake in Response to High-Intensity Interval Training versus Moderate- or Vigorous-Intensity Continuous Training among Physically Inactive Middle-Aged Adults
title_sort post-exercise appetite and ad libitum energy intake in response to high-intensity interval training versus moderate- or vigorous-intensity continuous training among physically inactive middle-aged adults
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6213307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30279345
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu10101408
work_keys_str_mv AT poonerictszchun postexerciseappetiteandadlibitumenergyintakeinresponsetohighintensityintervaltrainingversusmoderateorvigorousintensitycontinuoustrainingamongphysicallyinactivemiddleagedadults
AT sunfenghua postexerciseappetiteandadlibitumenergyintakeinresponsetohighintensityintervaltrainingversusmoderateorvigorousintensitycontinuoustrainingamongphysicallyinactivemiddleagedadults
AT chunganthonypuiwan postexerciseappetiteandadlibitumenergyintakeinresponsetohighintensityintervaltrainingversusmoderateorvigorousintensitycontinuoustrainingamongphysicallyinactivemiddleagedadults
AT wongstephenheungsang postexerciseappetiteandadlibitumenergyintakeinresponsetohighintensityintervaltrainingversusmoderateorvigorousintensitycontinuoustrainingamongphysicallyinactivemiddleagedadults