Cargando…

The latest FAD – Faecal antibody detection in cattle. Protocol and results from three UK beef farms naturally infected with gastrointestinal nematodes

Antibodies at gastrointestinal mucosal membranes play a vital role in immunological protection against a range of pathogens, including helminths. Gastrointestinal health is central to efficient livestock production, and such infections cause significant losses. Fecal samples were taken from 114 catt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cooke, A. S., Watt, K. A., Morgan, E. R., Dungait, J. A. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6230468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30086804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031182018000902
_version_ 1783370089122234368
author Cooke, A. S.
Watt, K. A.
Morgan, E. R.
Dungait, J. A. J.
author_facet Cooke, A. S.
Watt, K. A.
Morgan, E. R.
Dungait, J. A. J.
author_sort Cooke, A. S.
collection PubMed
description Antibodies at gastrointestinal mucosal membranes play a vital role in immunological protection against a range of pathogens, including helminths. Gastrointestinal health is central to efficient livestock production, and such infections cause significant losses. Fecal samples were taken from 114 cattle, across three beef farms, with matched blood samples taken from 22 of those animals. To achieve fecal antibody detection, a novel fecal supernatant was extracted. Fecal supernatant and serum samples were then analysed, using adapted enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay protocols, for levels of total immunoglobulin (Ig)A, IgG, IgM, and Teladorsagia circumcincta-specific IgA, IgG, IgM and IgE (in the absence of reagents for cattle-specific nematode species). Fecal nematode egg counts were conducted on all fecal samples. Assays performed successfully and showed that IgA was the predominant antibody in fecal samples, whereas IgG was predominant in serum. Total IgA in feces and serum correlated within individuals (0.581, P = 0.005), but other Ig types did not. Results support the hypothesis that the tested protocols are an effective method for the non-invasive assessment of cattle immunology. The method could be used as part of animal health assessments, although further work is required to interpret the relationship between results and levels of infection and immunity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6230468
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62304682019-01-12 The latest FAD – Faecal antibody detection in cattle. Protocol and results from three UK beef farms naturally infected with gastrointestinal nematodes Cooke, A. S. Watt, K. A. Morgan, E. R. Dungait, J. A. J. Parasitology Research Article Antibodies at gastrointestinal mucosal membranes play a vital role in immunological protection against a range of pathogens, including helminths. Gastrointestinal health is central to efficient livestock production, and such infections cause significant losses. Fecal samples were taken from 114 cattle, across three beef farms, with matched blood samples taken from 22 of those animals. To achieve fecal antibody detection, a novel fecal supernatant was extracted. Fecal supernatant and serum samples were then analysed, using adapted enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay protocols, for levels of total immunoglobulin (Ig)A, IgG, IgM, and Teladorsagia circumcincta-specific IgA, IgG, IgM and IgE (in the absence of reagents for cattle-specific nematode species). Fecal nematode egg counts were conducted on all fecal samples. Assays performed successfully and showed that IgA was the predominant antibody in fecal samples, whereas IgG was predominant in serum. Total IgA in feces and serum correlated within individuals (0.581, P = 0.005), but other Ig types did not. Results support the hypothesis that the tested protocols are an effective method for the non-invasive assessment of cattle immunology. The method could be used as part of animal health assessments, although further work is required to interpret the relationship between results and levels of infection and immunity. Cambridge University Press 2019-01 2018-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6230468/ /pubmed/30086804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031182018000902 Text en © Cambridge University Press 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cooke, A. S.
Watt, K. A.
Morgan, E. R.
Dungait, J. A. J.
The latest FAD – Faecal antibody detection in cattle. Protocol and results from three UK beef farms naturally infected with gastrointestinal nematodes
title The latest FAD – Faecal antibody detection in cattle. Protocol and results from three UK beef farms naturally infected with gastrointestinal nematodes
title_full The latest FAD – Faecal antibody detection in cattle. Protocol and results from three UK beef farms naturally infected with gastrointestinal nematodes
title_fullStr The latest FAD – Faecal antibody detection in cattle. Protocol and results from three UK beef farms naturally infected with gastrointestinal nematodes
title_full_unstemmed The latest FAD – Faecal antibody detection in cattle. Protocol and results from three UK beef farms naturally infected with gastrointestinal nematodes
title_short The latest FAD – Faecal antibody detection in cattle. Protocol and results from three UK beef farms naturally infected with gastrointestinal nematodes
title_sort latest fad – faecal antibody detection in cattle. protocol and results from three uk beef farms naturally infected with gastrointestinal nematodes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6230468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30086804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031182018000902
work_keys_str_mv AT cookeas thelatestfadfaecalantibodydetectionincattleprotocolandresultsfromthreeukbeeffarmsnaturallyinfectedwithgastrointestinalnematodes
AT wattka thelatestfadfaecalantibodydetectionincattleprotocolandresultsfromthreeukbeeffarmsnaturallyinfectedwithgastrointestinalnematodes
AT morganer thelatestfadfaecalantibodydetectionincattleprotocolandresultsfromthreeukbeeffarmsnaturallyinfectedwithgastrointestinalnematodes
AT dungaitjaj thelatestfadfaecalantibodydetectionincattleprotocolandresultsfromthreeukbeeffarmsnaturallyinfectedwithgastrointestinalnematodes
AT cookeas latestfadfaecalantibodydetectionincattleprotocolandresultsfromthreeukbeeffarmsnaturallyinfectedwithgastrointestinalnematodes
AT wattka latestfadfaecalantibodydetectionincattleprotocolandresultsfromthreeukbeeffarmsnaturallyinfectedwithgastrointestinalnematodes
AT morganer latestfadfaecalantibodydetectionincattleprotocolandresultsfromthreeukbeeffarmsnaturallyinfectedwithgastrointestinalnematodes
AT dungaitjaj latestfadfaecalantibodydetectionincattleprotocolandresultsfromthreeukbeeffarmsnaturallyinfectedwithgastrointestinalnematodes