Cargando…
Similar Gastro-Intestinal Exposure to Florfenicol After Oral or Intramuscular Administration in Pigs, Leading to Resistance Selection in Commensal Escherichia coli
Florfenicol, which is licensed for veterinary use only, proves to be a potent antimicrobial for treatment of respiratory disease. However, the subsequent exposure of the gut microbiota to florfenicol is not well described. Hence, the effect of various administration protocols on both plasma and gast...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6232271/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30459619 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.01265 |
_version_ | 1783370374752239616 |
---|---|
author | De Smet, Joren Boyen, Filip Croubels, Siska Rasschaert, Geertrui Haesebrouck, Freddy De Backer, Patrick Devreese, Mathias |
author_facet | De Smet, Joren Boyen, Filip Croubels, Siska Rasschaert, Geertrui Haesebrouck, Freddy De Backer, Patrick Devreese, Mathias |
author_sort | De Smet, Joren |
collection | PubMed |
description | Florfenicol, which is licensed for veterinary use only, proves to be a potent antimicrobial for treatment of respiratory disease. However, the subsequent exposure of the gut microbiota to florfenicol is not well described. Hence, the effect of various administration protocols on both plasma and gastro-intestinal florfenicol concentrations in pigs was evaluated. In field situations were simulated by application of different administration routes and dosages [single oral bolus at 10 or 5 mg/kg body weight (BW), medicated feed at 10 or 5 mg/kg BW and intramuscular injections at 15 or 30 mg/kg BW]. After intramuscular administration of 30 mg florfenicol/kg BW, gastro-intestinal concentrations of florfenicol, quantified 10 h after the last administration, were significantly elevated in comparison with the other treatment groups and ranging between 31.5 and 285.8 μg/g over the different gut segments. For the other treatment groups, the influence of dose and administration route was not significantly different. Bacteriological analysis of the fecal samples from the animals at the start of the experiment, demonstrated the presence of both florfenicol susceptible (with minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of 2–16 μg/mL) and florfenicol resistant (MIC ≥ 256 μg/mL) Escherichia coli isolates in all treatment groups. Following, at 10 h after the last administration the susceptible E. coli population was eradicated in all treatment groups due to the high intestinal florfenicol concentrations measured. Moreover, selection of the resistant E. coli strains during treatment occurred in all groups. This is likely related to the fact that the different treatment strategies led to high gastro-intestinal concentrations albeit not reaching the high magnitude of MIC values associated with florfenicol resistance (≥256 μg/mL). Conclusively, in our experimental setup the administration route and dose alterations studied, had no influence on monitored florfenicol resistance selection in E. coli from the microbiota. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6232271 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62322712018-11-20 Similar Gastro-Intestinal Exposure to Florfenicol After Oral or Intramuscular Administration in Pigs, Leading to Resistance Selection in Commensal Escherichia coli De Smet, Joren Boyen, Filip Croubels, Siska Rasschaert, Geertrui Haesebrouck, Freddy De Backer, Patrick Devreese, Mathias Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Florfenicol, which is licensed for veterinary use only, proves to be a potent antimicrobial for treatment of respiratory disease. However, the subsequent exposure of the gut microbiota to florfenicol is not well described. Hence, the effect of various administration protocols on both plasma and gastro-intestinal florfenicol concentrations in pigs was evaluated. In field situations were simulated by application of different administration routes and dosages [single oral bolus at 10 or 5 mg/kg body weight (BW), medicated feed at 10 or 5 mg/kg BW and intramuscular injections at 15 or 30 mg/kg BW]. After intramuscular administration of 30 mg florfenicol/kg BW, gastro-intestinal concentrations of florfenicol, quantified 10 h after the last administration, were significantly elevated in comparison with the other treatment groups and ranging between 31.5 and 285.8 μg/g over the different gut segments. For the other treatment groups, the influence of dose and administration route was not significantly different. Bacteriological analysis of the fecal samples from the animals at the start of the experiment, demonstrated the presence of both florfenicol susceptible (with minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of 2–16 μg/mL) and florfenicol resistant (MIC ≥ 256 μg/mL) Escherichia coli isolates in all treatment groups. Following, at 10 h after the last administration the susceptible E. coli population was eradicated in all treatment groups due to the high intestinal florfenicol concentrations measured. Moreover, selection of the resistant E. coli strains during treatment occurred in all groups. This is likely related to the fact that the different treatment strategies led to high gastro-intestinal concentrations albeit not reaching the high magnitude of MIC values associated with florfenicol resistance (≥256 μg/mL). Conclusively, in our experimental setup the administration route and dose alterations studied, had no influence on monitored florfenicol resistance selection in E. coli from the microbiota. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6232271/ /pubmed/30459619 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.01265 Text en Copyright © 2018 De Smet, Boyen, Croubels, Rasschaert, Haesebrouck, De Backer and Devreese. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Pharmacology De Smet, Joren Boyen, Filip Croubels, Siska Rasschaert, Geertrui Haesebrouck, Freddy De Backer, Patrick Devreese, Mathias Similar Gastro-Intestinal Exposure to Florfenicol After Oral or Intramuscular Administration in Pigs, Leading to Resistance Selection in Commensal Escherichia coli |
title | Similar Gastro-Intestinal Exposure to Florfenicol After Oral or Intramuscular Administration in Pigs, Leading to Resistance Selection in Commensal Escherichia coli |
title_full | Similar Gastro-Intestinal Exposure to Florfenicol After Oral or Intramuscular Administration in Pigs, Leading to Resistance Selection in Commensal Escherichia coli |
title_fullStr | Similar Gastro-Intestinal Exposure to Florfenicol After Oral or Intramuscular Administration in Pigs, Leading to Resistance Selection in Commensal Escherichia coli |
title_full_unstemmed | Similar Gastro-Intestinal Exposure to Florfenicol After Oral or Intramuscular Administration in Pigs, Leading to Resistance Selection in Commensal Escherichia coli |
title_short | Similar Gastro-Intestinal Exposure to Florfenicol After Oral or Intramuscular Administration in Pigs, Leading to Resistance Selection in Commensal Escherichia coli |
title_sort | similar gastro-intestinal exposure to florfenicol after oral or intramuscular administration in pigs, leading to resistance selection in commensal escherichia coli |
topic | Pharmacology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6232271/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30459619 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.01265 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT desmetjoren similargastrointestinalexposuretoflorfenicolafteroralorintramuscularadministrationinpigsleadingtoresistanceselectionincommensalescherichiacoli AT boyenfilip similargastrointestinalexposuretoflorfenicolafteroralorintramuscularadministrationinpigsleadingtoresistanceselectionincommensalescherichiacoli AT croubelssiska similargastrointestinalexposuretoflorfenicolafteroralorintramuscularadministrationinpigsleadingtoresistanceselectionincommensalescherichiacoli AT rasschaertgeertrui similargastrointestinalexposuretoflorfenicolafteroralorintramuscularadministrationinpigsleadingtoresistanceselectionincommensalescherichiacoli AT haesebrouckfreddy similargastrointestinalexposuretoflorfenicolafteroralorintramuscularadministrationinpigsleadingtoresistanceselectionincommensalescherichiacoli AT debackerpatrick similargastrointestinalexposuretoflorfenicolafteroralorintramuscularadministrationinpigsleadingtoresistanceselectionincommensalescherichiacoli AT devreesemathias similargastrointestinalexposuretoflorfenicolafteroralorintramuscularadministrationinpigsleadingtoresistanceselectionincommensalescherichiacoli |