Cargando…

Similar Gastro-Intestinal Exposure to Florfenicol After Oral or Intramuscular Administration in Pigs, Leading to Resistance Selection in Commensal Escherichia coli

Florfenicol, which is licensed for veterinary use only, proves to be a potent antimicrobial for treatment of respiratory disease. However, the subsequent exposure of the gut microbiota to florfenicol is not well described. Hence, the effect of various administration protocols on both plasma and gast...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Smet, Joren, Boyen, Filip, Croubels, Siska, Rasschaert, Geertrui, Haesebrouck, Freddy, De Backer, Patrick, Devreese, Mathias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6232271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30459619
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.01265
_version_ 1783370374752239616
author De Smet, Joren
Boyen, Filip
Croubels, Siska
Rasschaert, Geertrui
Haesebrouck, Freddy
De Backer, Patrick
Devreese, Mathias
author_facet De Smet, Joren
Boyen, Filip
Croubels, Siska
Rasschaert, Geertrui
Haesebrouck, Freddy
De Backer, Patrick
Devreese, Mathias
author_sort De Smet, Joren
collection PubMed
description Florfenicol, which is licensed for veterinary use only, proves to be a potent antimicrobial for treatment of respiratory disease. However, the subsequent exposure of the gut microbiota to florfenicol is not well described. Hence, the effect of various administration protocols on both plasma and gastro-intestinal florfenicol concentrations in pigs was evaluated. In field situations were simulated by application of different administration routes and dosages [single oral bolus at 10 or 5 mg/kg body weight (BW), medicated feed at 10 or 5 mg/kg BW and intramuscular injections at 15 or 30 mg/kg BW]. After intramuscular administration of 30 mg florfenicol/kg BW, gastro-intestinal concentrations of florfenicol, quantified 10 h after the last administration, were significantly elevated in comparison with the other treatment groups and ranging between 31.5 and 285.8 μg/g over the different gut segments. For the other treatment groups, the influence of dose and administration route was not significantly different. Bacteriological analysis of the fecal samples from the animals at the start of the experiment, demonstrated the presence of both florfenicol susceptible (with minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of 2–16 μg/mL) and florfenicol resistant (MIC ≥ 256 μg/mL) Escherichia coli isolates in all treatment groups. Following, at 10 h after the last administration the susceptible E. coli population was eradicated in all treatment groups due to the high intestinal florfenicol concentrations measured. Moreover, selection of the resistant E. coli strains during treatment occurred in all groups. This is likely related to the fact that the different treatment strategies led to high gastro-intestinal concentrations albeit not reaching the high magnitude of MIC values associated with florfenicol resistance (≥256 μg/mL). Conclusively, in our experimental setup the administration route and dose alterations studied, had no influence on monitored florfenicol resistance selection in E. coli from the microbiota.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6232271
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62322712018-11-20 Similar Gastro-Intestinal Exposure to Florfenicol After Oral or Intramuscular Administration in Pigs, Leading to Resistance Selection in Commensal Escherichia coli De Smet, Joren Boyen, Filip Croubels, Siska Rasschaert, Geertrui Haesebrouck, Freddy De Backer, Patrick Devreese, Mathias Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Florfenicol, which is licensed for veterinary use only, proves to be a potent antimicrobial for treatment of respiratory disease. However, the subsequent exposure of the gut microbiota to florfenicol is not well described. Hence, the effect of various administration protocols on both plasma and gastro-intestinal florfenicol concentrations in pigs was evaluated. In field situations were simulated by application of different administration routes and dosages [single oral bolus at 10 or 5 mg/kg body weight (BW), medicated feed at 10 or 5 mg/kg BW and intramuscular injections at 15 or 30 mg/kg BW]. After intramuscular administration of 30 mg florfenicol/kg BW, gastro-intestinal concentrations of florfenicol, quantified 10 h after the last administration, were significantly elevated in comparison with the other treatment groups and ranging between 31.5 and 285.8 μg/g over the different gut segments. For the other treatment groups, the influence of dose and administration route was not significantly different. Bacteriological analysis of the fecal samples from the animals at the start of the experiment, demonstrated the presence of both florfenicol susceptible (with minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of 2–16 μg/mL) and florfenicol resistant (MIC ≥ 256 μg/mL) Escherichia coli isolates in all treatment groups. Following, at 10 h after the last administration the susceptible E. coli population was eradicated in all treatment groups due to the high intestinal florfenicol concentrations measured. Moreover, selection of the resistant E. coli strains during treatment occurred in all groups. This is likely related to the fact that the different treatment strategies led to high gastro-intestinal concentrations albeit not reaching the high magnitude of MIC values associated with florfenicol resistance (≥256 μg/mL). Conclusively, in our experimental setup the administration route and dose alterations studied, had no influence on monitored florfenicol resistance selection in E. coli from the microbiota. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6232271/ /pubmed/30459619 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.01265 Text en Copyright © 2018 De Smet, Boyen, Croubels, Rasschaert, Haesebrouck, De Backer and Devreese. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
De Smet, Joren
Boyen, Filip
Croubels, Siska
Rasschaert, Geertrui
Haesebrouck, Freddy
De Backer, Patrick
Devreese, Mathias
Similar Gastro-Intestinal Exposure to Florfenicol After Oral or Intramuscular Administration in Pigs, Leading to Resistance Selection in Commensal Escherichia coli
title Similar Gastro-Intestinal Exposure to Florfenicol After Oral or Intramuscular Administration in Pigs, Leading to Resistance Selection in Commensal Escherichia coli
title_full Similar Gastro-Intestinal Exposure to Florfenicol After Oral or Intramuscular Administration in Pigs, Leading to Resistance Selection in Commensal Escherichia coli
title_fullStr Similar Gastro-Intestinal Exposure to Florfenicol After Oral or Intramuscular Administration in Pigs, Leading to Resistance Selection in Commensal Escherichia coli
title_full_unstemmed Similar Gastro-Intestinal Exposure to Florfenicol After Oral or Intramuscular Administration in Pigs, Leading to Resistance Selection in Commensal Escherichia coli
title_short Similar Gastro-Intestinal Exposure to Florfenicol After Oral or Intramuscular Administration in Pigs, Leading to Resistance Selection in Commensal Escherichia coli
title_sort similar gastro-intestinal exposure to florfenicol after oral or intramuscular administration in pigs, leading to resistance selection in commensal escherichia coli
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6232271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30459619
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.01265
work_keys_str_mv AT desmetjoren similargastrointestinalexposuretoflorfenicolafteroralorintramuscularadministrationinpigsleadingtoresistanceselectionincommensalescherichiacoli
AT boyenfilip similargastrointestinalexposuretoflorfenicolafteroralorintramuscularadministrationinpigsleadingtoresistanceselectionincommensalescherichiacoli
AT croubelssiska similargastrointestinalexposuretoflorfenicolafteroralorintramuscularadministrationinpigsleadingtoresistanceselectionincommensalescherichiacoli
AT rasschaertgeertrui similargastrointestinalexposuretoflorfenicolafteroralorintramuscularadministrationinpigsleadingtoresistanceselectionincommensalescherichiacoli
AT haesebrouckfreddy similargastrointestinalexposuretoflorfenicolafteroralorintramuscularadministrationinpigsleadingtoresistanceselectionincommensalescherichiacoli
AT debackerpatrick similargastrointestinalexposuretoflorfenicolafteroralorintramuscularadministrationinpigsleadingtoresistanceselectionincommensalescherichiacoli
AT devreesemathias similargastrointestinalexposuretoflorfenicolafteroralorintramuscularadministrationinpigsleadingtoresistanceselectionincommensalescherichiacoli