Cargando…

Constricted migration increases DNA damage and independently represses cell cycle

Cell migration through dense tissues or small capillaries can elongate the nucleus and even damage it, and any impact on cell cycle has the potential to affect various processes including carcinogenesis. Here, nuclear rupture and DNA damage increase with constricted migration in different phases of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pfeifer, Charlotte R., Xia, Yuntao, Zhu, Kuangzheng, Liu, Dazhen, Irianto, Jerome, García, Victor M. Morales, Millán, Leeza M. Santiago, Niese, Brandon, Harding, Shane, Deviri, Dan, Greenberg, Roger A., Discher, Dennis E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The American Society for Cell Biology 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6232975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29742017
http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E18-02-0079
_version_ 1783370498301755392
author Pfeifer, Charlotte R.
Xia, Yuntao
Zhu, Kuangzheng
Liu, Dazhen
Irianto, Jerome
García, Victor M. Morales
Millán, Leeza M. Santiago
Niese, Brandon
Harding, Shane
Deviri, Dan
Greenberg, Roger A.
Discher, Dennis E.
author_facet Pfeifer, Charlotte R.
Xia, Yuntao
Zhu, Kuangzheng
Liu, Dazhen
Irianto, Jerome
García, Victor M. Morales
Millán, Leeza M. Santiago
Niese, Brandon
Harding, Shane
Deviri, Dan
Greenberg, Roger A.
Discher, Dennis E.
author_sort Pfeifer, Charlotte R.
collection PubMed
description Cell migration through dense tissues or small capillaries can elongate the nucleus and even damage it, and any impact on cell cycle has the potential to affect various processes including carcinogenesis. Here, nuclear rupture and DNA damage increase with constricted migration in different phases of cell cycle—which we show is partially repressed. We study several cancer lines that are contact inhibited or not and that exhibit diverse frequencies of nuclear lamina rupture after migration through small pores. DNA repair factors invariably mislocalize after migration, and an excess of DNA damage is evident as pan-­nucleoplasmic foci of phosphoactivated ATM and γH2AX. Foci counts are suppressed in late cell cycle as expected of mitotic checkpoints, and migration of contact-inhibited cells through large pores into sparse microenvironments leads also as expected to cell-cycle reentry and no effect on a basal level of damage foci. Constricting pores delay such reentry while excess foci occur independent of cell-cycle phase. Knockdown of repair factors increases DNA damage independent of cell cycle, consistent with effects of constricted migration. Because such migration causes DNA damage and impedes proliferation, it illustrates a cancer cell fate choice of “go or grow.”
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6232975
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The American Society for Cell Biology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62329752018-11-19 Constricted migration increases DNA damage and independently represses cell cycle Pfeifer, Charlotte R. Xia, Yuntao Zhu, Kuangzheng Liu, Dazhen Irianto, Jerome García, Victor M. Morales Millán, Leeza M. Santiago Niese, Brandon Harding, Shane Deviri, Dan Greenberg, Roger A. Discher, Dennis E. Mol Biol Cell Articles Cell migration through dense tissues or small capillaries can elongate the nucleus and even damage it, and any impact on cell cycle has the potential to affect various processes including carcinogenesis. Here, nuclear rupture and DNA damage increase with constricted migration in different phases of cell cycle—which we show is partially repressed. We study several cancer lines that are contact inhibited or not and that exhibit diverse frequencies of nuclear lamina rupture after migration through small pores. DNA repair factors invariably mislocalize after migration, and an excess of DNA damage is evident as pan-­nucleoplasmic foci of phosphoactivated ATM and γH2AX. Foci counts are suppressed in late cell cycle as expected of mitotic checkpoints, and migration of contact-inhibited cells through large pores into sparse microenvironments leads also as expected to cell-cycle reentry and no effect on a basal level of damage foci. Constricting pores delay such reentry while excess foci occur independent of cell-cycle phase. Knockdown of repair factors increases DNA damage independent of cell cycle, consistent with effects of constricted migration. Because such migration causes DNA damage and impedes proliferation, it illustrates a cancer cell fate choice of “go or grow.” The American Society for Cell Biology 2018-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6232975/ /pubmed/29742017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E18-02-0079 Text en © 2018 Pfeifer et al. “ASCB®,” “The American Society for Cell Biology®,” and “Molecular Biology of the Cell®” are registered trademarks of The American Society for Cell Biology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). Two months after publication it is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License.
spellingShingle Articles
Pfeifer, Charlotte R.
Xia, Yuntao
Zhu, Kuangzheng
Liu, Dazhen
Irianto, Jerome
García, Victor M. Morales
Millán, Leeza M. Santiago
Niese, Brandon
Harding, Shane
Deviri, Dan
Greenberg, Roger A.
Discher, Dennis E.
Constricted migration increases DNA damage and independently represses cell cycle
title Constricted migration increases DNA damage and independently represses cell cycle
title_full Constricted migration increases DNA damage and independently represses cell cycle
title_fullStr Constricted migration increases DNA damage and independently represses cell cycle
title_full_unstemmed Constricted migration increases DNA damage and independently represses cell cycle
title_short Constricted migration increases DNA damage and independently represses cell cycle
title_sort constricted migration increases dna damage and independently represses cell cycle
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6232975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29742017
http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E18-02-0079
work_keys_str_mv AT pfeifercharlotter constrictedmigrationincreasesdnadamageandindependentlyrepressescellcycle
AT xiayuntao constrictedmigrationincreasesdnadamageandindependentlyrepressescellcycle
AT zhukuangzheng constrictedmigrationincreasesdnadamageandindependentlyrepressescellcycle
AT liudazhen constrictedmigrationincreasesdnadamageandindependentlyrepressescellcycle
AT iriantojerome constrictedmigrationincreasesdnadamageandindependentlyrepressescellcycle
AT garciavictormmorales constrictedmigrationincreasesdnadamageandindependentlyrepressescellcycle
AT millanleezamsantiago constrictedmigrationincreasesdnadamageandindependentlyrepressescellcycle
AT niesebrandon constrictedmigrationincreasesdnadamageandindependentlyrepressescellcycle
AT hardingshane constrictedmigrationincreasesdnadamageandindependentlyrepressescellcycle
AT deviridan constrictedmigrationincreasesdnadamageandindependentlyrepressescellcycle
AT greenbergrogera constrictedmigrationincreasesdnadamageandindependentlyrepressescellcycle
AT discherdennise constrictedmigrationincreasesdnadamageandindependentlyrepressescellcycle