Cargando…

A qualitative study of the drivers of socioeconomic inequalities in men’s eating behaviours

BACKGROUND: Men of low socioeconomic position (SEP) are less likely than those of higher SEP to consume fruits and vegetables, and more likely to eat processed discretionary foods. Education level is a widely used marker of SEP. Few studies have explored determinants of socioeconomic inequalities in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stephens, Lena D., Crawford, David, Thornton, Lukar, Olstad, Dana Lee, Morgan, Philip J., van Lenthe, Frank J., Ball, Kylie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6236940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30428860
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6162-6
_version_ 1783371115256610816
author Stephens, Lena D.
Crawford, David
Thornton, Lukar
Olstad, Dana Lee
Morgan, Philip J.
van Lenthe, Frank J.
Ball, Kylie
author_facet Stephens, Lena D.
Crawford, David
Thornton, Lukar
Olstad, Dana Lee
Morgan, Philip J.
van Lenthe, Frank J.
Ball, Kylie
author_sort Stephens, Lena D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Men of low socioeconomic position (SEP) are less likely than those of higher SEP to consume fruits and vegetables, and more likely to eat processed discretionary foods. Education level is a widely used marker of SEP. Few studies have explored determinants of socioeconomic inequalities in men’s eating behaviours. The present study aimed to explore intrapersonal, social and environmental factors potentially contributing to educational inequalities in men’s eating behaviour. METHODS: Thirty Australian men aged 18–60 years (15 each with tertiary or non-tertiary education) from two large metropolitan sites (Melbourne, Victoria; and Newcastle, New South Wales) participated in qualitative, semi-structured, one-on-one telephone interviews about their perceptions of influences on their and other men’s eating behaviours. The social ecological model informed interview question development, and data were examined using abductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Themes equally salient across tertiary and non-tertiary educated groups included attitudes about masculinity; nutrition knowledge and awareness; ‘moralising’ consumption of certain foods; the influence of children on eating; availability of healthy foods; convenience; and the interplay between cost, convenience, taste and healthfulness when choosing foods. More prominent influences among tertiary educated men included using advanced cooking skills but having relatively infrequent involvement in other food-related tasks; the influence of partner/spouse support on eating; access to healthy food; and cost. More predominant influences among non-tertiary educated men included having fewer cooking skills but frequent involvement in food-related tasks; identifying that ‘no-one’ influenced their diet; having mobile worksites; and adhering to food budgets. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified key similarities and differences in perceived influences on eating behaviours among men with lower and higher education levels. Further research is needed to determine the extent to which such influences explain socioeconomic variations in men’s dietary intakes, and to identify feasible strategies that might support healthy eating among men in different socioeconomic groups. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-018-6162-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6236940
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62369402018-11-20 A qualitative study of the drivers of socioeconomic inequalities in men’s eating behaviours Stephens, Lena D. Crawford, David Thornton, Lukar Olstad, Dana Lee Morgan, Philip J. van Lenthe, Frank J. Ball, Kylie BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Men of low socioeconomic position (SEP) are less likely than those of higher SEP to consume fruits and vegetables, and more likely to eat processed discretionary foods. Education level is a widely used marker of SEP. Few studies have explored determinants of socioeconomic inequalities in men’s eating behaviours. The present study aimed to explore intrapersonal, social and environmental factors potentially contributing to educational inequalities in men’s eating behaviour. METHODS: Thirty Australian men aged 18–60 years (15 each with tertiary or non-tertiary education) from two large metropolitan sites (Melbourne, Victoria; and Newcastle, New South Wales) participated in qualitative, semi-structured, one-on-one telephone interviews about their perceptions of influences on their and other men’s eating behaviours. The social ecological model informed interview question development, and data were examined using abductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Themes equally salient across tertiary and non-tertiary educated groups included attitudes about masculinity; nutrition knowledge and awareness; ‘moralising’ consumption of certain foods; the influence of children on eating; availability of healthy foods; convenience; and the interplay between cost, convenience, taste and healthfulness when choosing foods. More prominent influences among tertiary educated men included using advanced cooking skills but having relatively infrequent involvement in other food-related tasks; the influence of partner/spouse support on eating; access to healthy food; and cost. More predominant influences among non-tertiary educated men included having fewer cooking skills but frequent involvement in food-related tasks; identifying that ‘no-one’ influenced their diet; having mobile worksites; and adhering to food budgets. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified key similarities and differences in perceived influences on eating behaviours among men with lower and higher education levels. Further research is needed to determine the extent to which such influences explain socioeconomic variations in men’s dietary intakes, and to identify feasible strategies that might support healthy eating among men in different socioeconomic groups. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-018-6162-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6236940/ /pubmed/30428860 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6162-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Stephens, Lena D.
Crawford, David
Thornton, Lukar
Olstad, Dana Lee
Morgan, Philip J.
van Lenthe, Frank J.
Ball, Kylie
A qualitative study of the drivers of socioeconomic inequalities in men’s eating behaviours
title A qualitative study of the drivers of socioeconomic inequalities in men’s eating behaviours
title_full A qualitative study of the drivers of socioeconomic inequalities in men’s eating behaviours
title_fullStr A qualitative study of the drivers of socioeconomic inequalities in men’s eating behaviours
title_full_unstemmed A qualitative study of the drivers of socioeconomic inequalities in men’s eating behaviours
title_short A qualitative study of the drivers of socioeconomic inequalities in men’s eating behaviours
title_sort qualitative study of the drivers of socioeconomic inequalities in men’s eating behaviours
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6236940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30428860
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6162-6
work_keys_str_mv AT stephenslenad aqualitativestudyofthedriversofsocioeconomicinequalitiesinmenseatingbehaviours
AT crawforddavid aqualitativestudyofthedriversofsocioeconomicinequalitiesinmenseatingbehaviours
AT thorntonlukar aqualitativestudyofthedriversofsocioeconomicinequalitiesinmenseatingbehaviours
AT olstaddanalee aqualitativestudyofthedriversofsocioeconomicinequalitiesinmenseatingbehaviours
AT morganphilipj aqualitativestudyofthedriversofsocioeconomicinequalitiesinmenseatingbehaviours
AT vanlenthefrankj aqualitativestudyofthedriversofsocioeconomicinequalitiesinmenseatingbehaviours
AT ballkylie aqualitativestudyofthedriversofsocioeconomicinequalitiesinmenseatingbehaviours
AT stephenslenad qualitativestudyofthedriversofsocioeconomicinequalitiesinmenseatingbehaviours
AT crawforddavid qualitativestudyofthedriversofsocioeconomicinequalitiesinmenseatingbehaviours
AT thorntonlukar qualitativestudyofthedriversofsocioeconomicinequalitiesinmenseatingbehaviours
AT olstaddanalee qualitativestudyofthedriversofsocioeconomicinequalitiesinmenseatingbehaviours
AT morganphilipj qualitativestudyofthedriversofsocioeconomicinequalitiesinmenseatingbehaviours
AT vanlenthefrankj qualitativestudyofthedriversofsocioeconomicinequalitiesinmenseatingbehaviours
AT ballkylie qualitativestudyofthedriversofsocioeconomicinequalitiesinmenseatingbehaviours