Cargando…

Peer teacher training for health professional students: a systematic review of formal programs

BACKGROUND: Skills in peer teaching, assessment and feedback are documented internationally as required graduate attributes for health professional students, placing emphasis on universities to prepare health professional graduates with teaching skills. The aim of this systematic review was to deter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burgess, Annette, McGregor, Deborah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6238310/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30442139
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1356-2
_version_ 1783371349729738752
author Burgess, Annette
McGregor, Deborah
author_facet Burgess, Annette
McGregor, Deborah
author_sort Burgess, Annette
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Skills in peer teaching, assessment and feedback are documented internationally as required graduate attributes for health professional students, placing emphasis on universities to prepare health professional graduates with teaching skills. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the rational, design, content and evaluation of student peer teacher training skills programs across the health professions. METHODS: In October 2017, a search was conducted of five databases (Pubmed, Embase, CINAHL, ERIC and Cochrane Collection) using combinations of key search terms: ‘Student as teacher’, ‘near-peer teaching’, ‘student teacher’, ‘peer teacher’, ‘peer-to-peer’, ‘undergraduate’, ‘medical education’, ‘curriculum’, ‘program’, ‘training’, ‘allied health’, ‘health science’, ‘pharmacy’, ‘nurse’, and ‘medicine’, with results restricted to articles published in English within the decade. Articles were excluded if they were not original research, focused on a teaching approach other than peer assisted learning or teaching, did not adequately describe a student teacher training component of at least 3 hrs duration, or addressed only clinical skills training and not teaching skills training. RESULTS: The two authors independently assessed 42 full-text articles for eligibility, with 19 articles satisfying criteria for inclusion. Dominating results were uni-disciplinary, faculty-led, non-mandated programs, targeting participants in senior years of training. Medicine was the dominant profession, with an obvious underrepresentation of the other health professions. Common program content included the foundations of education theory, teaching methods and techniques, and providing feedback. Summary and comparison of program design is restricted by gaps and inconsistencies in reporting, while the evaluation of programs remains largely subjective. CONCLUSIONS: Teaching is increasingly recognised as a core professional skill across the health workforce, with expectations to teach peers and colleagues, within and across professional disciplines, as well as to educate patients. Students, faculty and institutes may benefit from training programs being designed for implementation in any health profession; and further to this, implemented within an interprofessionally context. Consistent reporting of teacher training programs, and objective methods of evaluation would enable more in-depth investigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6238310
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62383102018-11-23 Peer teacher training for health professional students: a systematic review of formal programs Burgess, Annette McGregor, Deborah BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Skills in peer teaching, assessment and feedback are documented internationally as required graduate attributes for health professional students, placing emphasis on universities to prepare health professional graduates with teaching skills. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the rational, design, content and evaluation of student peer teacher training skills programs across the health professions. METHODS: In October 2017, a search was conducted of five databases (Pubmed, Embase, CINAHL, ERIC and Cochrane Collection) using combinations of key search terms: ‘Student as teacher’, ‘near-peer teaching’, ‘student teacher’, ‘peer teacher’, ‘peer-to-peer’, ‘undergraduate’, ‘medical education’, ‘curriculum’, ‘program’, ‘training’, ‘allied health’, ‘health science’, ‘pharmacy’, ‘nurse’, and ‘medicine’, with results restricted to articles published in English within the decade. Articles were excluded if they were not original research, focused on a teaching approach other than peer assisted learning or teaching, did not adequately describe a student teacher training component of at least 3 hrs duration, or addressed only clinical skills training and not teaching skills training. RESULTS: The two authors independently assessed 42 full-text articles for eligibility, with 19 articles satisfying criteria for inclusion. Dominating results were uni-disciplinary, faculty-led, non-mandated programs, targeting participants in senior years of training. Medicine was the dominant profession, with an obvious underrepresentation of the other health professions. Common program content included the foundations of education theory, teaching methods and techniques, and providing feedback. Summary and comparison of program design is restricted by gaps and inconsistencies in reporting, while the evaluation of programs remains largely subjective. CONCLUSIONS: Teaching is increasingly recognised as a core professional skill across the health workforce, with expectations to teach peers and colleagues, within and across professional disciplines, as well as to educate patients. Students, faculty and institutes may benefit from training programs being designed for implementation in any health profession; and further to this, implemented within an interprofessionally context. Consistent reporting of teacher training programs, and objective methods of evaluation would enable more in-depth investigation. BioMed Central 2018-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6238310/ /pubmed/30442139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1356-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Burgess, Annette
McGregor, Deborah
Peer teacher training for health professional students: a systematic review of formal programs
title Peer teacher training for health professional students: a systematic review of formal programs
title_full Peer teacher training for health professional students: a systematic review of formal programs
title_fullStr Peer teacher training for health professional students: a systematic review of formal programs
title_full_unstemmed Peer teacher training for health professional students: a systematic review of formal programs
title_short Peer teacher training for health professional students: a systematic review of formal programs
title_sort peer teacher training for health professional students: a systematic review of formal programs
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6238310/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30442139
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1356-2
work_keys_str_mv AT burgessannette peerteachertrainingforhealthprofessionalstudentsasystematicreviewofformalprograms
AT mcgregordeborah peerteachertrainingforhealthprofessionalstudentsasystematicreviewofformalprograms