Cargando…

Disseminated learning from clinician-scientists: a multiple case study in physiotherapeutic care

BACKGROUND: Clinician-Scientists are considered to be important for continuous improvement of patient care, because they are ideally positioned to bridge the gap between scientific research and clinical care. However, limited empirical evidence is available about how they connect these two realms. S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Dijk, Esther E., Kluijtmans, Manon, Vulperhorst, Jonne P., Akkerman, Sanne F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6260853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30470217
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1374-0
_version_ 1783374875460632576
author van Dijk, Esther E.
Kluijtmans, Manon
Vulperhorst, Jonne P.
Akkerman, Sanne F.
author_facet van Dijk, Esther E.
Kluijtmans, Manon
Vulperhorst, Jonne P.
Akkerman, Sanne F.
author_sort van Dijk, Esther E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinician-Scientists are considered to be important for continuous improvement of patient care, because they are ideally positioned to bridge the gap between scientific research and clinical care. However, limited empirical evidence is available about how they connect these two realms. So far research has mainly focused on their direct role in bridging the gap. This study investigates an additional mechanism; that is whether clinician-scientists also connect science and care indirectly through disseminated learning. During this type of learning, clinical colleagues learn by working with clinician-scientists. METHODS: Disseminated learning was studied in five physiotherapeutic care settings in the Netherlands with clinician-scientists (N = 5) and their clinical colleagues (N = 14). Semi-structured interviews were conducted between March and May of 2016. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Clinicians and clinician-scientists in all settings reported clinicians learning informally. They learned by being informed about (evidence for) new tests and treatments, through increased understanding of the research process and research results, and through awareness of an academic reflective approach to care. Learning took place primarily through knowledge sharing, and to a lesser extent through role modeling or joint implementation. Interpersonal and organizational conditions, such as overlapping clinical expertise and organizational policy and culture, seemed to facilitate or hinder learning. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights disseminated learning as a mechanism of how clinician-scientists may connect science and care. Furthermore, it provides insight into how disseminated learning may take place and the conditions that may facilitate or restrict learning. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-018-1374-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6260853
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62608532018-12-10 Disseminated learning from clinician-scientists: a multiple case study in physiotherapeutic care van Dijk, Esther E. Kluijtmans, Manon Vulperhorst, Jonne P. Akkerman, Sanne F. BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Clinician-Scientists are considered to be important for continuous improvement of patient care, because they are ideally positioned to bridge the gap between scientific research and clinical care. However, limited empirical evidence is available about how they connect these two realms. So far research has mainly focused on their direct role in bridging the gap. This study investigates an additional mechanism; that is whether clinician-scientists also connect science and care indirectly through disseminated learning. During this type of learning, clinical colleagues learn by working with clinician-scientists. METHODS: Disseminated learning was studied in five physiotherapeutic care settings in the Netherlands with clinician-scientists (N = 5) and their clinical colleagues (N = 14). Semi-structured interviews were conducted between March and May of 2016. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Clinicians and clinician-scientists in all settings reported clinicians learning informally. They learned by being informed about (evidence for) new tests and treatments, through increased understanding of the research process and research results, and through awareness of an academic reflective approach to care. Learning took place primarily through knowledge sharing, and to a lesser extent through role modeling or joint implementation. Interpersonal and organizational conditions, such as overlapping clinical expertise and organizational policy and culture, seemed to facilitate or hinder learning. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights disseminated learning as a mechanism of how clinician-scientists may connect science and care. Furthermore, it provides insight into how disseminated learning may take place and the conditions that may facilitate or restrict learning. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-018-1374-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6260853/ /pubmed/30470217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1374-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
van Dijk, Esther E.
Kluijtmans, Manon
Vulperhorst, Jonne P.
Akkerman, Sanne F.
Disseminated learning from clinician-scientists: a multiple case study in physiotherapeutic care
title Disseminated learning from clinician-scientists: a multiple case study in physiotherapeutic care
title_full Disseminated learning from clinician-scientists: a multiple case study in physiotherapeutic care
title_fullStr Disseminated learning from clinician-scientists: a multiple case study in physiotherapeutic care
title_full_unstemmed Disseminated learning from clinician-scientists: a multiple case study in physiotherapeutic care
title_short Disseminated learning from clinician-scientists: a multiple case study in physiotherapeutic care
title_sort disseminated learning from clinician-scientists: a multiple case study in physiotherapeutic care
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6260853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30470217
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1374-0
work_keys_str_mv AT vandijkesthere disseminatedlearningfromclinicianscientistsamultiplecasestudyinphysiotherapeuticcare
AT kluijtmansmanon disseminatedlearningfromclinicianscientistsamultiplecasestudyinphysiotherapeuticcare
AT vulperhorstjonnep disseminatedlearningfromclinicianscientistsamultiplecasestudyinphysiotherapeuticcare
AT akkermansannef disseminatedlearningfromclinicianscientistsamultiplecasestudyinphysiotherapeuticcare