Cargando…

Test-retest reliability and convergent validity of (R)-[(11)C]PK11195 outcome measures without arterial input function

PURPOSE: The PET radioligand (R)-[(11)C]PK11195 is used to quantify the 18-kDa translocator protein (TSPO), a marker for glial activation. Since there is no brain region devoid of TSPO, an arterial input function (AIF) is ideally required for quantification of binding. However, obtaining an AIF is e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Plavén-Sigray, Pontus, Matheson, Granville James, Cselényi, Zsolt, Jucaite, Aurelija, Farde, Lars, Cervenka, Simon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6265355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30498919
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-018-0455-8
_version_ 1783375625269018624
author Plavén-Sigray, Pontus
Matheson, Granville James
Cselényi, Zsolt
Jucaite, Aurelija
Farde, Lars
Cervenka, Simon
author_facet Plavén-Sigray, Pontus
Matheson, Granville James
Cselényi, Zsolt
Jucaite, Aurelija
Farde, Lars
Cervenka, Simon
author_sort Plavén-Sigray, Pontus
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The PET radioligand (R)-[(11)C]PK11195 is used to quantify the 18-kDa translocator protein (TSPO), a marker for glial activation. Since there is no brain region devoid of TSPO, an arterial input function (AIF) is ideally required for quantification of binding. However, obtaining an AIF is experimentally demanding, is sometimes uncomfortable for participants, and can introduce additional measurement error during quantification. The objective of this study was to perform an evaluation of the test-retest reliability and convergent validity of techniques used for quantifying (R)-[(11)C]PK11195 binding without an AIF in clinical studies. METHODS: Data from six healthy individuals who participated in two PET examinations, 6 weeks apart, were analyzed. Regional non-displaceable binding potential (BP(ND)) values were calculated using the simplified reference tissue model, with either cerebellum as reference region or a reference input derived using supervised cluster analysis (SVCA). Standardized uptake values (SUVs) were estimated for the time interval of 40–60 min. RESULTS: Test-retest reliability for BP(ND) estimates were poor (80% of ICCs < 0.5). BP(ND) estimates derived without an AIF were not correlated with BP(ND), total or specific distribution volume from the 2TCM using an AIF (all R(2) < 12%). SUVs showed moderate reliability but no correlation to any other outcome measure. CONCLUSIONS: Caution is warranted when interpreting patient-control comparisons employing (R)-[(11)C]PK11195 outcome measures obtained without an AIF. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13550-018-0455-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6265355
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62653552018-12-18 Test-retest reliability and convergent validity of (R)-[(11)C]PK11195 outcome measures without arterial input function Plavén-Sigray, Pontus Matheson, Granville James Cselényi, Zsolt Jucaite, Aurelija Farde, Lars Cervenka, Simon EJNMMI Res Original Research PURPOSE: The PET radioligand (R)-[(11)C]PK11195 is used to quantify the 18-kDa translocator protein (TSPO), a marker for glial activation. Since there is no brain region devoid of TSPO, an arterial input function (AIF) is ideally required for quantification of binding. However, obtaining an AIF is experimentally demanding, is sometimes uncomfortable for participants, and can introduce additional measurement error during quantification. The objective of this study was to perform an evaluation of the test-retest reliability and convergent validity of techniques used for quantifying (R)-[(11)C]PK11195 binding without an AIF in clinical studies. METHODS: Data from six healthy individuals who participated in two PET examinations, 6 weeks apart, were analyzed. Regional non-displaceable binding potential (BP(ND)) values were calculated using the simplified reference tissue model, with either cerebellum as reference region or a reference input derived using supervised cluster analysis (SVCA). Standardized uptake values (SUVs) were estimated for the time interval of 40–60 min. RESULTS: Test-retest reliability for BP(ND) estimates were poor (80% of ICCs < 0.5). BP(ND) estimates derived without an AIF were not correlated with BP(ND), total or specific distribution volume from the 2TCM using an AIF (all R(2) < 12%). SUVs showed moderate reliability but no correlation to any other outcome measure. CONCLUSIONS: Caution is warranted when interpreting patient-control comparisons employing (R)-[(11)C]PK11195 outcome measures obtained without an AIF. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13550-018-0455-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6265355/ /pubmed/30498919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-018-0455-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Plavén-Sigray, Pontus
Matheson, Granville James
Cselényi, Zsolt
Jucaite, Aurelija
Farde, Lars
Cervenka, Simon
Test-retest reliability and convergent validity of (R)-[(11)C]PK11195 outcome measures without arterial input function
title Test-retest reliability and convergent validity of (R)-[(11)C]PK11195 outcome measures without arterial input function
title_full Test-retest reliability and convergent validity of (R)-[(11)C]PK11195 outcome measures without arterial input function
title_fullStr Test-retest reliability and convergent validity of (R)-[(11)C]PK11195 outcome measures without arterial input function
title_full_unstemmed Test-retest reliability and convergent validity of (R)-[(11)C]PK11195 outcome measures without arterial input function
title_short Test-retest reliability and convergent validity of (R)-[(11)C]PK11195 outcome measures without arterial input function
title_sort test-retest reliability and convergent validity of (r)-[(11)c]pk11195 outcome measures without arterial input function
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6265355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30498919
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-018-0455-8
work_keys_str_mv AT plavensigraypontus testretestreliabilityandconvergentvalidityofr11cpk11195outcomemeasureswithoutarterialinputfunction
AT mathesongranvillejames testretestreliabilityandconvergentvalidityofr11cpk11195outcomemeasureswithoutarterialinputfunction
AT cselenyizsolt testretestreliabilityandconvergentvalidityofr11cpk11195outcomemeasureswithoutarterialinputfunction
AT jucaiteaurelija testretestreliabilityandconvergentvalidityofr11cpk11195outcomemeasureswithoutarterialinputfunction
AT fardelars testretestreliabilityandconvergentvalidityofr11cpk11195outcomemeasureswithoutarterialinputfunction
AT cervenkasimon testretestreliabilityandconvergentvalidityofr11cpk11195outcomemeasureswithoutarterialinputfunction