Cargando…

Monolithic Multi Degree of Freedom (MDoF) Capacitive MEMS Accelerometers

With the continuous advancements in microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) fabrication technology, inertial sensors like accelerometers and gyroscopes can be designed and manufactured with smaller footprint and lower power consumption. In the literature, there are several reported accelerometer desig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohammed, Zakriya, Elfadel, Ibrahim (Abe) M., Rasras, Mahmoud
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6266379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30453536
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi9110602
_version_ 1783375826022039552
author Mohammed, Zakriya
Elfadel, Ibrahim (Abe) M.
Rasras, Mahmoud
author_facet Mohammed, Zakriya
Elfadel, Ibrahim (Abe) M.
Rasras, Mahmoud
author_sort Mohammed, Zakriya
collection PubMed
description With the continuous advancements in microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) fabrication technology, inertial sensors like accelerometers and gyroscopes can be designed and manufactured with smaller footprint and lower power consumption. In the literature, there are several reported accelerometer designs based on MEMS technology and utilizing various transductions like capacitive, piezoelectric, optical, thermal, among several others. In particular, capacitive accelerometers are the most popular and highly researched due to several advantages like high sensitivity, low noise, low temperature sensitivity, linearity, and small footprint. Accelerometers can be designed to sense acceleration in all the three directions (X, Y, and Z-axis). Single-axis accelerometers are the most common and are often integrated orthogonally and combined as multiple-degree-of-freedom (MDoF) packages for sensing acceleration in the three directions. This type of MDoF increases the overall device footprint and cost. It also causes calibration errors and may require expensive compensations. Another type of MDoF accelerometers is based on monolithic integration and is proving to be effective in solving the footprint and calibration problems. There are mainly two classes of such monolithic MDoF accelerometers, depending on the number of proof masses used. The first class uses multiple proof masses with the main advantage being zero calibration issues. The second class uses a single proof mass, which results in compact device with a reduced noise floor. The latter class, however, suffers from high cross-axis sensitivity. It also requires very innovative layout designs, owing to the complicated mechanical structures and electrical contact placement. The performance complications due to nonlinearity, post fabrication process, and readout electronics affects both classes of accelerometers. In order to effectively compare them, we have used metrics such as sensitivity per unit area and noise-area product. This paper is devoted to an in-depth review of monolithic multi-axis capacitive MEMS accelerometers, including a detailed analysis of recent advancements aimed at solving their problems such as size, noise floor, cross-axis sensitivity, and process aware modeling.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6266379
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62663792018-12-06 Monolithic Multi Degree of Freedom (MDoF) Capacitive MEMS Accelerometers Mohammed, Zakriya Elfadel, Ibrahim (Abe) M. Rasras, Mahmoud Micromachines (Basel) Review With the continuous advancements in microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) fabrication technology, inertial sensors like accelerometers and gyroscopes can be designed and manufactured with smaller footprint and lower power consumption. In the literature, there are several reported accelerometer designs based on MEMS technology and utilizing various transductions like capacitive, piezoelectric, optical, thermal, among several others. In particular, capacitive accelerometers are the most popular and highly researched due to several advantages like high sensitivity, low noise, low temperature sensitivity, linearity, and small footprint. Accelerometers can be designed to sense acceleration in all the three directions (X, Y, and Z-axis). Single-axis accelerometers are the most common and are often integrated orthogonally and combined as multiple-degree-of-freedom (MDoF) packages for sensing acceleration in the three directions. This type of MDoF increases the overall device footprint and cost. It also causes calibration errors and may require expensive compensations. Another type of MDoF accelerometers is based on monolithic integration and is proving to be effective in solving the footprint and calibration problems. There are mainly two classes of such monolithic MDoF accelerometers, depending on the number of proof masses used. The first class uses multiple proof masses with the main advantage being zero calibration issues. The second class uses a single proof mass, which results in compact device with a reduced noise floor. The latter class, however, suffers from high cross-axis sensitivity. It also requires very innovative layout designs, owing to the complicated mechanical structures and electrical contact placement. The performance complications due to nonlinearity, post fabrication process, and readout electronics affects both classes of accelerometers. In order to effectively compare them, we have used metrics such as sensitivity per unit area and noise-area product. This paper is devoted to an in-depth review of monolithic multi-axis capacitive MEMS accelerometers, including a detailed analysis of recent advancements aimed at solving their problems such as size, noise floor, cross-axis sensitivity, and process aware modeling. MDPI 2018-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6266379/ /pubmed/30453536 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi9110602 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Mohammed, Zakriya
Elfadel, Ibrahim (Abe) M.
Rasras, Mahmoud
Monolithic Multi Degree of Freedom (MDoF) Capacitive MEMS Accelerometers
title Monolithic Multi Degree of Freedom (MDoF) Capacitive MEMS Accelerometers
title_full Monolithic Multi Degree of Freedom (MDoF) Capacitive MEMS Accelerometers
title_fullStr Monolithic Multi Degree of Freedom (MDoF) Capacitive MEMS Accelerometers
title_full_unstemmed Monolithic Multi Degree of Freedom (MDoF) Capacitive MEMS Accelerometers
title_short Monolithic Multi Degree of Freedom (MDoF) Capacitive MEMS Accelerometers
title_sort monolithic multi degree of freedom (mdof) capacitive mems accelerometers
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6266379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30453536
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi9110602
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammedzakriya monolithicmultidegreeoffreedommdofcapacitivememsaccelerometers
AT elfadelibrahimabem monolithicmultidegreeoffreedommdofcapacitivememsaccelerometers
AT rasrasmahmoud monolithicmultidegreeoffreedommdofcapacitivememsaccelerometers