Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Total Antioxidant Capacities of Plant Polyphenols

Thirty-seven samples of naturally occurring phenolic compounds were evaluated using three common in vitro assays for total antioxidant activity (TAC) testing: the Trolox Equivalent Antioxidant Capacity (TEAC), the Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Potential (FRAP) and the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DP...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Csepregi, Kristóf, Neugart, Susanne, Schreiner, Monika, Hideg, Éva
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6274360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26867192
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules21020208
_version_ 1783377600006062080
author Csepregi, Kristóf
Neugart, Susanne
Schreiner, Monika
Hideg, Éva
author_facet Csepregi, Kristóf
Neugart, Susanne
Schreiner, Monika
Hideg, Éva
author_sort Csepregi, Kristóf
collection PubMed
description Thirty-seven samples of naturally occurring phenolic compounds were evaluated using three common in vitro assays for total antioxidant activity (TAC) testing: the Trolox Equivalent Antioxidant Capacity (TEAC), the Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Potential (FRAP) and the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging assay, in addition to the Folin-Ciocalteu reagent reactivity (FCR). We found that antioxidant hierarchies depended on the choice of assay and applied ANOVA analyses to explore underlying structure-TAC dependencies. In addition to statistically confirming the empirically established connection between flavonoid ring-B catechol and high TEAC or FRAP, new correlations were also found. In flavonoids, (i) hydroxyl groups on ring-B had a positive effect on all four TAC assays; (ii) the presence of a 3-hydroxyl group on ring-C increased TEAC and FRAP, but had no effect on DPPH or FCR; (iii) Phenolic acids lacking a 3-hydroxyl group had significantly lower FRAP or DPPH than compounds having this structure, while TEAC or FCR were not affected. Results demonstrated that any TAC-based ranking of phenolic rich samples would very much depend on the choice of assay, and argue for use of more than one technique. As an illustration, we compared results of the above four assays using either grapevine leaf extracts or synthetic mixtures of compounds prepared according to major polyphenols identified in the leaves.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6274360
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62743602018-12-28 Comparative Evaluation of Total Antioxidant Capacities of Plant Polyphenols Csepregi, Kristóf Neugart, Susanne Schreiner, Monika Hideg, Éva Molecules Article Thirty-seven samples of naturally occurring phenolic compounds were evaluated using three common in vitro assays for total antioxidant activity (TAC) testing: the Trolox Equivalent Antioxidant Capacity (TEAC), the Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Potential (FRAP) and the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging assay, in addition to the Folin-Ciocalteu reagent reactivity (FCR). We found that antioxidant hierarchies depended on the choice of assay and applied ANOVA analyses to explore underlying structure-TAC dependencies. In addition to statistically confirming the empirically established connection between flavonoid ring-B catechol and high TEAC or FRAP, new correlations were also found. In flavonoids, (i) hydroxyl groups on ring-B had a positive effect on all four TAC assays; (ii) the presence of a 3-hydroxyl group on ring-C increased TEAC and FRAP, but had no effect on DPPH or FCR; (iii) Phenolic acids lacking a 3-hydroxyl group had significantly lower FRAP or DPPH than compounds having this structure, while TEAC or FCR were not affected. Results demonstrated that any TAC-based ranking of phenolic rich samples would very much depend on the choice of assay, and argue for use of more than one technique. As an illustration, we compared results of the above four assays using either grapevine leaf extracts or synthetic mixtures of compounds prepared according to major polyphenols identified in the leaves. MDPI 2016-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6274360/ /pubmed/26867192 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules21020208 Text en © 2016 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons by Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Csepregi, Kristóf
Neugart, Susanne
Schreiner, Monika
Hideg, Éva
Comparative Evaluation of Total Antioxidant Capacities of Plant Polyphenols
title Comparative Evaluation of Total Antioxidant Capacities of Plant Polyphenols
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Total Antioxidant Capacities of Plant Polyphenols
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Total Antioxidant Capacities of Plant Polyphenols
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Total Antioxidant Capacities of Plant Polyphenols
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Total Antioxidant Capacities of Plant Polyphenols
title_sort comparative evaluation of total antioxidant capacities of plant polyphenols
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6274360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26867192
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules21020208
work_keys_str_mv AT csepregikristof comparativeevaluationoftotalantioxidantcapacitiesofplantpolyphenols
AT neugartsusanne comparativeevaluationoftotalantioxidantcapacitiesofplantpolyphenols
AT schreinermonika comparativeevaluationoftotalantioxidantcapacitiesofplantpolyphenols
AT hidegeva comparativeevaluationoftotalantioxidantcapacitiesofplantpolyphenols