Cargando…

A Highly Active Form of XCL1/Lymphotactin Functions as an Effective Adjuvant to Recruit Cross-Presenting Dendritic Cells for Induction of Effector and Memory CD8(+) T Cells

The chemokine receptor XCR1 is known to be selectively expressed by cross-presenting dendritic cells (DCs), while its ligand XCL1/lymphotactin is mainly produced by activated CD8(+) T cells and natural killer cells. Recent studies have shown that XCL1-antigen fusion proteins efficiently induce CD8(+...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matsuo, Kazuhiko, Kitahata, Kosuke, Kawabata, Fumika, Kamei, Momo, Hara, Yuta, Takamura, Shiki, Oiso, Naoki, Kawada, Akira, Yoshie, Osamu, Nakayama, Takashi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6277777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30542351
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.02775
Descripción
Sumario:The chemokine receptor XCR1 is known to be selectively expressed by cross-presenting dendritic cells (DCs), while its ligand XCL1/lymphotactin is mainly produced by activated CD8(+) T cells and natural killer cells. Recent studies have shown that XCL1-antigen fusion proteins efficiently induce CD8(+) T cell responses by preferentially delivering antigens to XCR1(+) DCs. However, XCL1 per se was found to be a poor adjuvant for induction of CD8(+) T cell responses. XCL1 is unique because of its lack of one of the two disulfide bonds commonly conserved in all other chemokines and thus has an unstable structure with a relatively weak chemokine activity. In the present study, we generated a variant form of murine XCL1 termed mXCL1-V21C/A59C that contained a second disulfide bond to stabilize its chemokine structure. We confirmed that mXCL1-V21C/A59C had much more potent chemotactic and calcium mobilization activities than the wild type XCL1 (mXCL1-WT). Intradermal injection of mXCL1-V21C/A59C, but not that of mXCL1-WT, significantly increased the accumulation of XCR1(+)CD103(+) DCs in the injection site, and most of the accumulated XCR1(+)CD103(+) DCs were found to take up co-injected ovalbumin (OVA). Furthermore, recruited XCR1(+)CD103(+) DCs efficiently migrated to the draining lymph nodes and stayed for a prolonged period of time. Consequently, mXCL1-V21C/A59C strongly induced OVA-specific CD8(+) T cells. The combination of OVA and mXCL1-V21C/A59C well protected mice from E.G7-OVA tumor growth in both prophylactic and therapeutic protocols. Finally, memory CTL responses were efficiently induced in mice immunized with OVA and mXCL1-V21C/A59C. Although intradermal injection of OVA and polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid (poly(I:C)) as an adjuvant also induced CD8(+) T cell responses to OVA, poly (I:C) poorly recruited XCR1(+)CD103(+) DCs in the injection site and failed to induce significant memory CTL responses to OVA. Collectively, our findings demonstrate that a highly active form of XCL1 is a promising vaccine adjuvant for cross-presenting DCs to induce antigen-specific effector and memory CD8(+) T cells.