Cargando…

Analysing the use of the Australian Health Star Rating system by level of food processing

BACKGROUND: The consumption of ultra-processed foods is associated with diminished dietary quality and adverse health outcomes. The Australian Health Star Rating (HSR) is a nutrient-based front-of-pack (FOP) labelling system that assesses the ‘healthiness’ of foods on a scale of 0.5 to 5 stars based...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dickie, Sarah, Woods, Julie L., Lawrence, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6293654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30545373
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-018-0760-7
_version_ 1783380582798983168
author Dickie, Sarah
Woods, Julie L.
Lawrence, Mark
author_facet Dickie, Sarah
Woods, Julie L.
Lawrence, Mark
author_sort Dickie, Sarah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The consumption of ultra-processed foods is associated with diminished dietary quality and adverse health outcomes. The Australian Health Star Rating (HSR) is a nutrient-based front-of-pack (FOP) labelling system that assesses the ‘healthiness’ of foods on a scale of 0.5 to 5 stars based on their content of ‘risk’ and ‘positive’ nutrients. This study aimed to analyse the use of health stars on new packaged food products entering the Australian marketplace by level of food processing. METHODS: The Mintel Global New Product Database (GNPD) was searched to identify the number of stars displayed on the labels of all new packaged food products participating in the HSR system released into the Australian retail food supply between 27 June 2014 (the endorsement date) and 30 June 2017. Products were categorised by the four NOVA food processing categories: unprocessed and minimally processed (MP), processed culinary ingredients (PCI), processed (P), and ultra-processed (UP), and the distribution of the star ratings within each category was compared and analysed. RESULTS: The majority of new food products displaying an HSR were UP (74.4%), followed by MP (12.5%), P (11.6%), and PCI (1.5%). The median HSR of MP products (4.5) was significantly higher than the median of P (4) and UP products (3.5) (all p < 0.05). In all NOVA categories HSR profiles were distributed towards higher star ratings, and the majority (77%) of UP products displayed an HSR ≥ 2.5. CONCLUSIONS: The HSR is being displayed on a substantial proportion of newly released UP foods. Technical weaknesses, design flaws and governance limitations with the HSR system are resulting in 3 out of 4 instances of these UP foods displaying at least 2.5 so-called ‘health’ stars. These findings add further evidence to concerns that the HSR system, in its current form, is misrepresenting the healthiness of new packaged food products and creating a risk for behavioural nutrition. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12966-018-0760-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6293654
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62936542018-12-18 Analysing the use of the Australian Health Star Rating system by level of food processing Dickie, Sarah Woods, Julie L. Lawrence, Mark Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Research BACKGROUND: The consumption of ultra-processed foods is associated with diminished dietary quality and adverse health outcomes. The Australian Health Star Rating (HSR) is a nutrient-based front-of-pack (FOP) labelling system that assesses the ‘healthiness’ of foods on a scale of 0.5 to 5 stars based on their content of ‘risk’ and ‘positive’ nutrients. This study aimed to analyse the use of health stars on new packaged food products entering the Australian marketplace by level of food processing. METHODS: The Mintel Global New Product Database (GNPD) was searched to identify the number of stars displayed on the labels of all new packaged food products participating in the HSR system released into the Australian retail food supply between 27 June 2014 (the endorsement date) and 30 June 2017. Products were categorised by the four NOVA food processing categories: unprocessed and minimally processed (MP), processed culinary ingredients (PCI), processed (P), and ultra-processed (UP), and the distribution of the star ratings within each category was compared and analysed. RESULTS: The majority of new food products displaying an HSR were UP (74.4%), followed by MP (12.5%), P (11.6%), and PCI (1.5%). The median HSR of MP products (4.5) was significantly higher than the median of P (4) and UP products (3.5) (all p < 0.05). In all NOVA categories HSR profiles were distributed towards higher star ratings, and the majority (77%) of UP products displayed an HSR ≥ 2.5. CONCLUSIONS: The HSR is being displayed on a substantial proportion of newly released UP foods. Technical weaknesses, design flaws and governance limitations with the HSR system are resulting in 3 out of 4 instances of these UP foods displaying at least 2.5 so-called ‘health’ stars. These findings add further evidence to concerns that the HSR system, in its current form, is misrepresenting the healthiness of new packaged food products and creating a risk for behavioural nutrition. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12966-018-0760-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6293654/ /pubmed/30545373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-018-0760-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Dickie, Sarah
Woods, Julie L.
Lawrence, Mark
Analysing the use of the Australian Health Star Rating system by level of food processing
title Analysing the use of the Australian Health Star Rating system by level of food processing
title_full Analysing the use of the Australian Health Star Rating system by level of food processing
title_fullStr Analysing the use of the Australian Health Star Rating system by level of food processing
title_full_unstemmed Analysing the use of the Australian Health Star Rating system by level of food processing
title_short Analysing the use of the Australian Health Star Rating system by level of food processing
title_sort analysing the use of the australian health star rating system by level of food processing
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6293654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30545373
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-018-0760-7
work_keys_str_mv AT dickiesarah analysingtheuseoftheaustralianhealthstarratingsystembyleveloffoodprocessing
AT woodsjuliel analysingtheuseoftheaustralianhealthstarratingsystembyleveloffoodprocessing
AT lawrencemark analysingtheuseoftheaustralianhealthstarratingsystembyleveloffoodprocessing