Cargando…
Analysing the use of the Australian Health Star Rating system by level of food processing
BACKGROUND: The consumption of ultra-processed foods is associated with diminished dietary quality and adverse health outcomes. The Australian Health Star Rating (HSR) is a nutrient-based front-of-pack (FOP) labelling system that assesses the ‘healthiness’ of foods on a scale of 0.5 to 5 stars based...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6293654/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30545373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-018-0760-7 |
_version_ | 1783380582798983168 |
---|---|
author | Dickie, Sarah Woods, Julie L. Lawrence, Mark |
author_facet | Dickie, Sarah Woods, Julie L. Lawrence, Mark |
author_sort | Dickie, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The consumption of ultra-processed foods is associated with diminished dietary quality and adverse health outcomes. The Australian Health Star Rating (HSR) is a nutrient-based front-of-pack (FOP) labelling system that assesses the ‘healthiness’ of foods on a scale of 0.5 to 5 stars based on their content of ‘risk’ and ‘positive’ nutrients. This study aimed to analyse the use of health stars on new packaged food products entering the Australian marketplace by level of food processing. METHODS: The Mintel Global New Product Database (GNPD) was searched to identify the number of stars displayed on the labels of all new packaged food products participating in the HSR system released into the Australian retail food supply between 27 June 2014 (the endorsement date) and 30 June 2017. Products were categorised by the four NOVA food processing categories: unprocessed and minimally processed (MP), processed culinary ingredients (PCI), processed (P), and ultra-processed (UP), and the distribution of the star ratings within each category was compared and analysed. RESULTS: The majority of new food products displaying an HSR were UP (74.4%), followed by MP (12.5%), P (11.6%), and PCI (1.5%). The median HSR of MP products (4.5) was significantly higher than the median of P (4) and UP products (3.5) (all p < 0.05). In all NOVA categories HSR profiles were distributed towards higher star ratings, and the majority (77%) of UP products displayed an HSR ≥ 2.5. CONCLUSIONS: The HSR is being displayed on a substantial proportion of newly released UP foods. Technical weaknesses, design flaws and governance limitations with the HSR system are resulting in 3 out of 4 instances of these UP foods displaying at least 2.5 so-called ‘health’ stars. These findings add further evidence to concerns that the HSR system, in its current form, is misrepresenting the healthiness of new packaged food products and creating a risk for behavioural nutrition. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12966-018-0760-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6293654 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62936542018-12-18 Analysing the use of the Australian Health Star Rating system by level of food processing Dickie, Sarah Woods, Julie L. Lawrence, Mark Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Research BACKGROUND: The consumption of ultra-processed foods is associated with diminished dietary quality and adverse health outcomes. The Australian Health Star Rating (HSR) is a nutrient-based front-of-pack (FOP) labelling system that assesses the ‘healthiness’ of foods on a scale of 0.5 to 5 stars based on their content of ‘risk’ and ‘positive’ nutrients. This study aimed to analyse the use of health stars on new packaged food products entering the Australian marketplace by level of food processing. METHODS: The Mintel Global New Product Database (GNPD) was searched to identify the number of stars displayed on the labels of all new packaged food products participating in the HSR system released into the Australian retail food supply between 27 June 2014 (the endorsement date) and 30 June 2017. Products were categorised by the four NOVA food processing categories: unprocessed and minimally processed (MP), processed culinary ingredients (PCI), processed (P), and ultra-processed (UP), and the distribution of the star ratings within each category was compared and analysed. RESULTS: The majority of new food products displaying an HSR were UP (74.4%), followed by MP (12.5%), P (11.6%), and PCI (1.5%). The median HSR of MP products (4.5) was significantly higher than the median of P (4) and UP products (3.5) (all p < 0.05). In all NOVA categories HSR profiles were distributed towards higher star ratings, and the majority (77%) of UP products displayed an HSR ≥ 2.5. CONCLUSIONS: The HSR is being displayed on a substantial proportion of newly released UP foods. Technical weaknesses, design flaws and governance limitations with the HSR system are resulting in 3 out of 4 instances of these UP foods displaying at least 2.5 so-called ‘health’ stars. These findings add further evidence to concerns that the HSR system, in its current form, is misrepresenting the healthiness of new packaged food products and creating a risk for behavioural nutrition. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12966-018-0760-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6293654/ /pubmed/30545373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-018-0760-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Dickie, Sarah Woods, Julie L. Lawrence, Mark Analysing the use of the Australian Health Star Rating system by level of food processing |
title | Analysing the use of the Australian Health Star Rating system by level of food processing |
title_full | Analysing the use of the Australian Health Star Rating system by level of food processing |
title_fullStr | Analysing the use of the Australian Health Star Rating system by level of food processing |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysing the use of the Australian Health Star Rating system by level of food processing |
title_short | Analysing the use of the Australian Health Star Rating system by level of food processing |
title_sort | analysing the use of the australian health star rating system by level of food processing |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6293654/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30545373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-018-0760-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dickiesarah analysingtheuseoftheaustralianhealthstarratingsystembyleveloffoodprocessing AT woodsjuliel analysingtheuseoftheaustralianhealthstarratingsystembyleveloffoodprocessing AT lawrencemark analysingtheuseoftheaustralianhealthstarratingsystembyleveloffoodprocessing |