Cargando…

Comparative assessment of different familial aggregation methods in the context of large and unstructured pedigrees

MOTIVATION: Familial aggregation analysis is an important early step for characterizing the genetic determinants of phenotypes in epidemiological studies. To facilitate this analysis, a collection of methods to detect familial aggregation in large pedigrees has been made available recently. However,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weichenberger, Christian X, Rainer, Johannes, Pattaro, Cristian, Pramstaller, Peter P, Domingues, Francisco S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6298062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30010787
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty541
_version_ 1783381253045616640
author Weichenberger, Christian X
Rainer, Johannes
Pattaro, Cristian
Pramstaller, Peter P
Domingues, Francisco S
author_facet Weichenberger, Christian X
Rainer, Johannes
Pattaro, Cristian
Pramstaller, Peter P
Domingues, Francisco S
author_sort Weichenberger, Christian X
collection PubMed
description MOTIVATION: Familial aggregation analysis is an important early step for characterizing the genetic determinants of phenotypes in epidemiological studies. To facilitate this analysis, a collection of methods to detect familial aggregation in large pedigrees has been made available recently. However, efficacy of these methods in real world scenarios remains largely unknown. Here, we assess the performance of five aggregation methods to identify individuals or groups of related individuals affected by a Mendelian trait within a large set of decoys. We investigate method performance under a representative set of combinations of causal variant penetrance, trait prevalence and number of affected generations in the pedigree. These methods are then applied to assess familial aggregation of familial hypercholesterolemia and stroke, in the context of the Cooperative Health Research in South Tyrol (CHRIS) study. RESULTS: We find that in some situations statistical hypothesis testing with a binomial null distribution achieves performance similar to methods that are based on kinship information, while kinship based methods perform better when information is available on fewer generations. Potential case families from the CHRIS study are reported and the results are discussed taking into account insights from the performance assessment. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The familial aggregation analysis package is freely available at the Bioconductor repository, http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/FamAgg. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6298062
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62980622018-12-21 Comparative assessment of different familial aggregation methods in the context of large and unstructured pedigrees Weichenberger, Christian X Rainer, Johannes Pattaro, Cristian Pramstaller, Peter P Domingues, Francisco S Bioinformatics Original Papers MOTIVATION: Familial aggregation analysis is an important early step for characterizing the genetic determinants of phenotypes in epidemiological studies. To facilitate this analysis, a collection of methods to detect familial aggregation in large pedigrees has been made available recently. However, efficacy of these methods in real world scenarios remains largely unknown. Here, we assess the performance of five aggregation methods to identify individuals or groups of related individuals affected by a Mendelian trait within a large set of decoys. We investigate method performance under a representative set of combinations of causal variant penetrance, trait prevalence and number of affected generations in the pedigree. These methods are then applied to assess familial aggregation of familial hypercholesterolemia and stroke, in the context of the Cooperative Health Research in South Tyrol (CHRIS) study. RESULTS: We find that in some situations statistical hypothesis testing with a binomial null distribution achieves performance similar to methods that are based on kinship information, while kinship based methods perform better when information is available on fewer generations. Potential case families from the CHRIS study are reported and the results are discussed taking into account insights from the performance assessment. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The familial aggregation analysis package is freely available at the Bioconductor repository, http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/FamAgg. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Oxford University Press 2019-01-01 2018-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6298062/ /pubmed/30010787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty541 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Papers
Weichenberger, Christian X
Rainer, Johannes
Pattaro, Cristian
Pramstaller, Peter P
Domingues, Francisco S
Comparative assessment of different familial aggregation methods in the context of large and unstructured pedigrees
title Comparative assessment of different familial aggregation methods in the context of large and unstructured pedigrees
title_full Comparative assessment of different familial aggregation methods in the context of large and unstructured pedigrees
title_fullStr Comparative assessment of different familial aggregation methods in the context of large and unstructured pedigrees
title_full_unstemmed Comparative assessment of different familial aggregation methods in the context of large and unstructured pedigrees
title_short Comparative assessment of different familial aggregation methods in the context of large and unstructured pedigrees
title_sort comparative assessment of different familial aggregation methods in the context of large and unstructured pedigrees
topic Original Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6298062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30010787
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty541
work_keys_str_mv AT weichenbergerchristianx comparativeassessmentofdifferentfamilialaggregationmethodsinthecontextoflargeandunstructuredpedigrees
AT rainerjohannes comparativeassessmentofdifferentfamilialaggregationmethodsinthecontextoflargeandunstructuredpedigrees
AT pattarocristian comparativeassessmentofdifferentfamilialaggregationmethodsinthecontextoflargeandunstructuredpedigrees
AT pramstallerpeterp comparativeassessmentofdifferentfamilialaggregationmethodsinthecontextoflargeandunstructuredpedigrees
AT dominguesfranciscos comparativeassessmentofdifferentfamilialaggregationmethodsinthecontextoflargeandunstructuredpedigrees