Cargando…
Comparative assessment of different familial aggregation methods in the context of large and unstructured pedigrees
MOTIVATION: Familial aggregation analysis is an important early step for characterizing the genetic determinants of phenotypes in epidemiological studies. To facilitate this analysis, a collection of methods to detect familial aggregation in large pedigrees has been made available recently. However,...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6298062/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30010787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty541 |
_version_ | 1783381253045616640 |
---|---|
author | Weichenberger, Christian X Rainer, Johannes Pattaro, Cristian Pramstaller, Peter P Domingues, Francisco S |
author_facet | Weichenberger, Christian X Rainer, Johannes Pattaro, Cristian Pramstaller, Peter P Domingues, Francisco S |
author_sort | Weichenberger, Christian X |
collection | PubMed |
description | MOTIVATION: Familial aggregation analysis is an important early step for characterizing the genetic determinants of phenotypes in epidemiological studies. To facilitate this analysis, a collection of methods to detect familial aggregation in large pedigrees has been made available recently. However, efficacy of these methods in real world scenarios remains largely unknown. Here, we assess the performance of five aggregation methods to identify individuals or groups of related individuals affected by a Mendelian trait within a large set of decoys. We investigate method performance under a representative set of combinations of causal variant penetrance, trait prevalence and number of affected generations in the pedigree. These methods are then applied to assess familial aggregation of familial hypercholesterolemia and stroke, in the context of the Cooperative Health Research in South Tyrol (CHRIS) study. RESULTS: We find that in some situations statistical hypothesis testing with a binomial null distribution achieves performance similar to methods that are based on kinship information, while kinship based methods perform better when information is available on fewer generations. Potential case families from the CHRIS study are reported and the results are discussed taking into account insights from the performance assessment. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The familial aggregation analysis package is freely available at the Bioconductor repository, http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/FamAgg. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6298062 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62980622018-12-21 Comparative assessment of different familial aggregation methods in the context of large and unstructured pedigrees Weichenberger, Christian X Rainer, Johannes Pattaro, Cristian Pramstaller, Peter P Domingues, Francisco S Bioinformatics Original Papers MOTIVATION: Familial aggregation analysis is an important early step for characterizing the genetic determinants of phenotypes in epidemiological studies. To facilitate this analysis, a collection of methods to detect familial aggregation in large pedigrees has been made available recently. However, efficacy of these methods in real world scenarios remains largely unknown. Here, we assess the performance of five aggregation methods to identify individuals or groups of related individuals affected by a Mendelian trait within a large set of decoys. We investigate method performance under a representative set of combinations of causal variant penetrance, trait prevalence and number of affected generations in the pedigree. These methods are then applied to assess familial aggregation of familial hypercholesterolemia and stroke, in the context of the Cooperative Health Research in South Tyrol (CHRIS) study. RESULTS: We find that in some situations statistical hypothesis testing with a binomial null distribution achieves performance similar to methods that are based on kinship information, while kinship based methods perform better when information is available on fewer generations. Potential case families from the CHRIS study are reported and the results are discussed taking into account insights from the performance assessment. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The familial aggregation analysis package is freely available at the Bioconductor repository, http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/FamAgg. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Oxford University Press 2019-01-01 2018-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6298062/ /pubmed/30010787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty541 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Papers Weichenberger, Christian X Rainer, Johannes Pattaro, Cristian Pramstaller, Peter P Domingues, Francisco S Comparative assessment of different familial aggregation methods in the context of large and unstructured pedigrees |
title | Comparative assessment of different familial aggregation methods in the context of large and unstructured pedigrees |
title_full | Comparative assessment of different familial aggregation methods in the context of large and unstructured pedigrees |
title_fullStr | Comparative assessment of different familial aggregation methods in the context of large and unstructured pedigrees |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative assessment of different familial aggregation methods in the context of large and unstructured pedigrees |
title_short | Comparative assessment of different familial aggregation methods in the context of large and unstructured pedigrees |
title_sort | comparative assessment of different familial aggregation methods in the context of large and unstructured pedigrees |
topic | Original Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6298062/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30010787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty541 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weichenbergerchristianx comparativeassessmentofdifferentfamilialaggregationmethodsinthecontextoflargeandunstructuredpedigrees AT rainerjohannes comparativeassessmentofdifferentfamilialaggregationmethodsinthecontextoflargeandunstructuredpedigrees AT pattarocristian comparativeassessmentofdifferentfamilialaggregationmethodsinthecontextoflargeandunstructuredpedigrees AT pramstallerpeterp comparativeassessmentofdifferentfamilialaggregationmethodsinthecontextoflargeandunstructuredpedigrees AT dominguesfranciscos comparativeassessmentofdifferentfamilialaggregationmethodsinthecontextoflargeandunstructuredpedigrees |