Cargando…

Lexical Knowledge Boosts Statistically-Driven Speech Segmentation

The hypothesis that known words can serve as anchors for discovering new words in connected speech has computational and empirical support. However, evidence for how the bootstrapping effect of known words interacts with other mechanisms of lexical acquisition, such as statistical learning, is incom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Palmer, Shekeila D., Hutson, James, White, Laurence, Mattys, Sven L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Psychological Association 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6307531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29952630
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000567
_version_ 1783383020616548352
author Palmer, Shekeila D.
Hutson, James
White, Laurence
Mattys, Sven L.
author_facet Palmer, Shekeila D.
Hutson, James
White, Laurence
Mattys, Sven L.
author_sort Palmer, Shekeila D.
collection PubMed
description The hypothesis that known words can serve as anchors for discovering new words in connected speech has computational and empirical support. However, evidence for how the bootstrapping effect of known words interacts with other mechanisms of lexical acquisition, such as statistical learning, is incomplete. In 3 experiments, we investigated the consequences of introducing a known word in an artificial language with no segmentation cues other than cross-syllable transitional probabilities. We started with an artificial language containing 4 trisyllabic novel words and observed standard above-chance performance in a subsequent recognition memory task. We then replaced 1 of the 4 novel words with a real word (tomorrow) and noted improved segmentation of the other 3 novel words. This improvement was maintained when the real word was a different length to the novel words (philosophy), ruling out an explanation based on metrical expectation. The improvement was also maintained when the word was added to the 4 original novel words rather than replacing 1 of them. Together, these results show that known words in an otherwise meaningless stream serve as anchors for discovering new words. In interpreting the results, we contrast a mechanism where the lexical boost is merely the consequence of attending to the edges of known words, with a mechanism where known words enhance sensitivity to transitional probabilities more generally.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6307531
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher American Psychological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63075312019-01-09 Lexical Knowledge Boosts Statistically-Driven Speech Segmentation Palmer, Shekeila D. Hutson, James White, Laurence Mattys, Sven L. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn Research Articles The hypothesis that known words can serve as anchors for discovering new words in connected speech has computational and empirical support. However, evidence for how the bootstrapping effect of known words interacts with other mechanisms of lexical acquisition, such as statistical learning, is incomplete. In 3 experiments, we investigated the consequences of introducing a known word in an artificial language with no segmentation cues other than cross-syllable transitional probabilities. We started with an artificial language containing 4 trisyllabic novel words and observed standard above-chance performance in a subsequent recognition memory task. We then replaced 1 of the 4 novel words with a real word (tomorrow) and noted improved segmentation of the other 3 novel words. This improvement was maintained when the real word was a different length to the novel words (philosophy), ruling out an explanation based on metrical expectation. The improvement was also maintained when the word was added to the 4 original novel words rather than replacing 1 of them. Together, these results show that known words in an otherwise meaningless stream serve as anchors for discovering new words. In interpreting the results, we contrast a mechanism where the lexical boost is merely the consequence of attending to the edges of known words, with a mechanism where known words enhance sensitivity to transitional probabilities more generally. American Psychological Association 2018-06-28 2019-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6307531/ /pubmed/29952630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000567 Text en © 2018 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article has been published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s). Author(s) grant(s) the American Psychological Association the exclusive right to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Palmer, Shekeila D.
Hutson, James
White, Laurence
Mattys, Sven L.
Lexical Knowledge Boosts Statistically-Driven Speech Segmentation
title Lexical Knowledge Boosts Statistically-Driven Speech Segmentation
title_full Lexical Knowledge Boosts Statistically-Driven Speech Segmentation
title_fullStr Lexical Knowledge Boosts Statistically-Driven Speech Segmentation
title_full_unstemmed Lexical Knowledge Boosts Statistically-Driven Speech Segmentation
title_short Lexical Knowledge Boosts Statistically-Driven Speech Segmentation
title_sort lexical knowledge boosts statistically-driven speech segmentation
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6307531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29952630
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000567
work_keys_str_mv AT palmershekeilad lexicalknowledgeboostsstatisticallydrivenspeechsegmentation
AT hutsonjames lexicalknowledgeboostsstatisticallydrivenspeechsegmentation
AT whitelaurence lexicalknowledgeboostsstatisticallydrivenspeechsegmentation
AT mattyssvenl lexicalknowledgeboostsstatisticallydrivenspeechsegmentation