Cargando…
Lexical Knowledge Boosts Statistically-Driven Speech Segmentation
The hypothesis that known words can serve as anchors for discovering new words in connected speech has computational and empirical support. However, evidence for how the bootstrapping effect of known words interacts with other mechanisms of lexical acquisition, such as statistical learning, is incom...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Psychological Association
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6307531/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29952630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000567 |
_version_ | 1783383020616548352 |
---|---|
author | Palmer, Shekeila D. Hutson, James White, Laurence Mattys, Sven L. |
author_facet | Palmer, Shekeila D. Hutson, James White, Laurence Mattys, Sven L. |
author_sort | Palmer, Shekeila D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The hypothesis that known words can serve as anchors for discovering new words in connected speech has computational and empirical support. However, evidence for how the bootstrapping effect of known words interacts with other mechanisms of lexical acquisition, such as statistical learning, is incomplete. In 3 experiments, we investigated the consequences of introducing a known word in an artificial language with no segmentation cues other than cross-syllable transitional probabilities. We started with an artificial language containing 4 trisyllabic novel words and observed standard above-chance performance in a subsequent recognition memory task. We then replaced 1 of the 4 novel words with a real word (tomorrow) and noted improved segmentation of the other 3 novel words. This improvement was maintained when the real word was a different length to the novel words (philosophy), ruling out an explanation based on metrical expectation. The improvement was also maintained when the word was added to the 4 original novel words rather than replacing 1 of them. Together, these results show that known words in an otherwise meaningless stream serve as anchors for discovering new words. In interpreting the results, we contrast a mechanism where the lexical boost is merely the consequence of attending to the edges of known words, with a mechanism where known words enhance sensitivity to transitional probabilities more generally. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6307531 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | American Psychological Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63075312019-01-09 Lexical Knowledge Boosts Statistically-Driven Speech Segmentation Palmer, Shekeila D. Hutson, James White, Laurence Mattys, Sven L. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn Research Articles The hypothesis that known words can serve as anchors for discovering new words in connected speech has computational and empirical support. However, evidence for how the bootstrapping effect of known words interacts with other mechanisms of lexical acquisition, such as statistical learning, is incomplete. In 3 experiments, we investigated the consequences of introducing a known word in an artificial language with no segmentation cues other than cross-syllable transitional probabilities. We started with an artificial language containing 4 trisyllabic novel words and observed standard above-chance performance in a subsequent recognition memory task. We then replaced 1 of the 4 novel words with a real word (tomorrow) and noted improved segmentation of the other 3 novel words. This improvement was maintained when the real word was a different length to the novel words (philosophy), ruling out an explanation based on metrical expectation. The improvement was also maintained when the word was added to the 4 original novel words rather than replacing 1 of them. Together, these results show that known words in an otherwise meaningless stream serve as anchors for discovering new words. In interpreting the results, we contrast a mechanism where the lexical boost is merely the consequence of attending to the edges of known words, with a mechanism where known words enhance sensitivity to transitional probabilities more generally. American Psychological Association 2018-06-28 2019-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6307531/ /pubmed/29952630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000567 Text en © 2018 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article has been published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s). Author(s) grant(s) the American Psychological Association the exclusive right to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Palmer, Shekeila D. Hutson, James White, Laurence Mattys, Sven L. Lexical Knowledge Boosts Statistically-Driven Speech Segmentation |
title | Lexical Knowledge Boosts Statistically-Driven Speech Segmentation |
title_full | Lexical Knowledge Boosts Statistically-Driven Speech Segmentation |
title_fullStr | Lexical Knowledge Boosts Statistically-Driven Speech Segmentation |
title_full_unstemmed | Lexical Knowledge Boosts Statistically-Driven Speech Segmentation |
title_short | Lexical Knowledge Boosts Statistically-Driven Speech Segmentation |
title_sort | lexical knowledge boosts statistically-driven speech segmentation |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6307531/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29952630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000567 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT palmershekeilad lexicalknowledgeboostsstatisticallydrivenspeechsegmentation AT hutsonjames lexicalknowledgeboostsstatisticallydrivenspeechsegmentation AT whitelaurence lexicalknowledgeboostsstatisticallydrivenspeechsegmentation AT mattyssvenl lexicalknowledgeboostsstatisticallydrivenspeechsegmentation |