Cargando…
A Guided Vehicle under Fire Conditions Based on a Modified Ultrasonic Obstacle Avoidance Technology
Low visibility and hot smoke environment under fire conditions can largely hamper the related fire rescue processes. Ultrasound obstacle avoidance technology is then useful for guidance. However, the biggest challenge of adopting ultrasound technology comes from accurate distance measurements under...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6308595/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30544725 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18124366 |
_version_ | 1783383226008469504 |
---|---|
author | Li, Sen Feng, Chunyong Liang, Xiaoge Qin, Hengjie Li, Haihang Shi, Long |
author_facet | Li, Sen Feng, Chunyong Liang, Xiaoge Qin, Hengjie Li, Haihang Shi, Long |
author_sort | Li, Sen |
collection | PubMed |
description | Low visibility and hot smoke environment under fire conditions can largely hamper the related fire rescue processes. Ultrasound obstacle avoidance technology is then useful for guidance. However, the biggest challenge of adopting ultrasound technology comes from accurate distance measurements under the disturbances of high temperature and soot particle concentration. It is critical to measure the propagation speed under the complicated fire conditions. Therefore, in this study, a baffle calibration method was proposed to improve the accuracy of distance measurement of an obstacle. The method is based on two ultrasound measurement systems, while one is used to calibrate the propagation speed of ultrasound based on the fixed distanced baffle and the other is for the dynamic measurement of obstacle distance based on the calibrated speed. The viability of this method on the guided vehicle was confirmed based on the experiments. From its comparison to those existing methods, such as constant speed and temperature compensation methods, it was known from that the proposed baffle calibration method provides the best prediction. It was obtained that the maximum errors based on the baffle calibration method are 2.75% and 2.62% under the two representative fire scenarios, respectively, which are much lower than those of constant speed (7.81% and 8.4%) and temperature compensation methods (10.4% and 5.12%). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6308595 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63085952019-01-04 A Guided Vehicle under Fire Conditions Based on a Modified Ultrasonic Obstacle Avoidance Technology Li, Sen Feng, Chunyong Liang, Xiaoge Qin, Hengjie Li, Haihang Shi, Long Sensors (Basel) Article Low visibility and hot smoke environment under fire conditions can largely hamper the related fire rescue processes. Ultrasound obstacle avoidance technology is then useful for guidance. However, the biggest challenge of adopting ultrasound technology comes from accurate distance measurements under the disturbances of high temperature and soot particle concentration. It is critical to measure the propagation speed under the complicated fire conditions. Therefore, in this study, a baffle calibration method was proposed to improve the accuracy of distance measurement of an obstacle. The method is based on two ultrasound measurement systems, while one is used to calibrate the propagation speed of ultrasound based on the fixed distanced baffle and the other is for the dynamic measurement of obstacle distance based on the calibrated speed. The viability of this method on the guided vehicle was confirmed based on the experiments. From its comparison to those existing methods, such as constant speed and temperature compensation methods, it was known from that the proposed baffle calibration method provides the best prediction. It was obtained that the maximum errors based on the baffle calibration method are 2.75% and 2.62% under the two representative fire scenarios, respectively, which are much lower than those of constant speed (7.81% and 8.4%) and temperature compensation methods (10.4% and 5.12%). MDPI 2018-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6308595/ /pubmed/30544725 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18124366 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Li, Sen Feng, Chunyong Liang, Xiaoge Qin, Hengjie Li, Haihang Shi, Long A Guided Vehicle under Fire Conditions Based on a Modified Ultrasonic Obstacle Avoidance Technology |
title | A Guided Vehicle under Fire Conditions Based on a Modified Ultrasonic Obstacle Avoidance Technology |
title_full | A Guided Vehicle under Fire Conditions Based on a Modified Ultrasonic Obstacle Avoidance Technology |
title_fullStr | A Guided Vehicle under Fire Conditions Based on a Modified Ultrasonic Obstacle Avoidance Technology |
title_full_unstemmed | A Guided Vehicle under Fire Conditions Based on a Modified Ultrasonic Obstacle Avoidance Technology |
title_short | A Guided Vehicle under Fire Conditions Based on a Modified Ultrasonic Obstacle Avoidance Technology |
title_sort | guided vehicle under fire conditions based on a modified ultrasonic obstacle avoidance technology |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6308595/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30544725 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18124366 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lisen aguidedvehicleunderfireconditionsbasedonamodifiedultrasonicobstacleavoidancetechnology AT fengchunyong aguidedvehicleunderfireconditionsbasedonamodifiedultrasonicobstacleavoidancetechnology AT liangxiaoge aguidedvehicleunderfireconditionsbasedonamodifiedultrasonicobstacleavoidancetechnology AT qinhengjie aguidedvehicleunderfireconditionsbasedonamodifiedultrasonicobstacleavoidancetechnology AT lihaihang aguidedvehicleunderfireconditionsbasedonamodifiedultrasonicobstacleavoidancetechnology AT shilong aguidedvehicleunderfireconditionsbasedonamodifiedultrasonicobstacleavoidancetechnology AT lisen guidedvehicleunderfireconditionsbasedonamodifiedultrasonicobstacleavoidancetechnology AT fengchunyong guidedvehicleunderfireconditionsbasedonamodifiedultrasonicobstacleavoidancetechnology AT liangxiaoge guidedvehicleunderfireconditionsbasedonamodifiedultrasonicobstacleavoidancetechnology AT qinhengjie guidedvehicleunderfireconditionsbasedonamodifiedultrasonicobstacleavoidancetechnology AT lihaihang guidedvehicleunderfireconditionsbasedonamodifiedultrasonicobstacleavoidancetechnology AT shilong guidedvehicleunderfireconditionsbasedonamodifiedultrasonicobstacleavoidancetechnology |