Cargando…

A Guided Vehicle under Fire Conditions Based on a Modified Ultrasonic Obstacle Avoidance Technology

Low visibility and hot smoke environment under fire conditions can largely hamper the related fire rescue processes. Ultrasound obstacle avoidance technology is then useful for guidance. However, the biggest challenge of adopting ultrasound technology comes from accurate distance measurements under...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Sen, Feng, Chunyong, Liang, Xiaoge, Qin, Hengjie, Li, Haihang, Shi, Long
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6308595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30544725
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18124366
_version_ 1783383226008469504
author Li, Sen
Feng, Chunyong
Liang, Xiaoge
Qin, Hengjie
Li, Haihang
Shi, Long
author_facet Li, Sen
Feng, Chunyong
Liang, Xiaoge
Qin, Hengjie
Li, Haihang
Shi, Long
author_sort Li, Sen
collection PubMed
description Low visibility and hot smoke environment under fire conditions can largely hamper the related fire rescue processes. Ultrasound obstacle avoidance technology is then useful for guidance. However, the biggest challenge of adopting ultrasound technology comes from accurate distance measurements under the disturbances of high temperature and soot particle concentration. It is critical to measure the propagation speed under the complicated fire conditions. Therefore, in this study, a baffle calibration method was proposed to improve the accuracy of distance measurement of an obstacle. The method is based on two ultrasound measurement systems, while one is used to calibrate the propagation speed of ultrasound based on the fixed distanced baffle and the other is for the dynamic measurement of obstacle distance based on the calibrated speed. The viability of this method on the guided vehicle was confirmed based on the experiments. From its comparison to those existing methods, such as constant speed and temperature compensation methods, it was known from that the proposed baffle calibration method provides the best prediction. It was obtained that the maximum errors based on the baffle calibration method are 2.75% and 2.62% under the two representative fire scenarios, respectively, which are much lower than those of constant speed (7.81% and 8.4%) and temperature compensation methods (10.4% and 5.12%).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6308595
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63085952019-01-04 A Guided Vehicle under Fire Conditions Based on a Modified Ultrasonic Obstacle Avoidance Technology Li, Sen Feng, Chunyong Liang, Xiaoge Qin, Hengjie Li, Haihang Shi, Long Sensors (Basel) Article Low visibility and hot smoke environment under fire conditions can largely hamper the related fire rescue processes. Ultrasound obstacle avoidance technology is then useful for guidance. However, the biggest challenge of adopting ultrasound technology comes from accurate distance measurements under the disturbances of high temperature and soot particle concentration. It is critical to measure the propagation speed under the complicated fire conditions. Therefore, in this study, a baffle calibration method was proposed to improve the accuracy of distance measurement of an obstacle. The method is based on two ultrasound measurement systems, while one is used to calibrate the propagation speed of ultrasound based on the fixed distanced baffle and the other is for the dynamic measurement of obstacle distance based on the calibrated speed. The viability of this method on the guided vehicle was confirmed based on the experiments. From its comparison to those existing methods, such as constant speed and temperature compensation methods, it was known from that the proposed baffle calibration method provides the best prediction. It was obtained that the maximum errors based on the baffle calibration method are 2.75% and 2.62% under the two representative fire scenarios, respectively, which are much lower than those of constant speed (7.81% and 8.4%) and temperature compensation methods (10.4% and 5.12%). MDPI 2018-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6308595/ /pubmed/30544725 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18124366 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Li, Sen
Feng, Chunyong
Liang, Xiaoge
Qin, Hengjie
Li, Haihang
Shi, Long
A Guided Vehicle under Fire Conditions Based on a Modified Ultrasonic Obstacle Avoidance Technology
title A Guided Vehicle under Fire Conditions Based on a Modified Ultrasonic Obstacle Avoidance Technology
title_full A Guided Vehicle under Fire Conditions Based on a Modified Ultrasonic Obstacle Avoidance Technology
title_fullStr A Guided Vehicle under Fire Conditions Based on a Modified Ultrasonic Obstacle Avoidance Technology
title_full_unstemmed A Guided Vehicle under Fire Conditions Based on a Modified Ultrasonic Obstacle Avoidance Technology
title_short A Guided Vehicle under Fire Conditions Based on a Modified Ultrasonic Obstacle Avoidance Technology
title_sort guided vehicle under fire conditions based on a modified ultrasonic obstacle avoidance technology
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6308595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30544725
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18124366
work_keys_str_mv AT lisen aguidedvehicleunderfireconditionsbasedonamodifiedultrasonicobstacleavoidancetechnology
AT fengchunyong aguidedvehicleunderfireconditionsbasedonamodifiedultrasonicobstacleavoidancetechnology
AT liangxiaoge aguidedvehicleunderfireconditionsbasedonamodifiedultrasonicobstacleavoidancetechnology
AT qinhengjie aguidedvehicleunderfireconditionsbasedonamodifiedultrasonicobstacleavoidancetechnology
AT lihaihang aguidedvehicleunderfireconditionsbasedonamodifiedultrasonicobstacleavoidancetechnology
AT shilong aguidedvehicleunderfireconditionsbasedonamodifiedultrasonicobstacleavoidancetechnology
AT lisen guidedvehicleunderfireconditionsbasedonamodifiedultrasonicobstacleavoidancetechnology
AT fengchunyong guidedvehicleunderfireconditionsbasedonamodifiedultrasonicobstacleavoidancetechnology
AT liangxiaoge guidedvehicleunderfireconditionsbasedonamodifiedultrasonicobstacleavoidancetechnology
AT qinhengjie guidedvehicleunderfireconditionsbasedonamodifiedultrasonicobstacleavoidancetechnology
AT lihaihang guidedvehicleunderfireconditionsbasedonamodifiedultrasonicobstacleavoidancetechnology
AT shilong guidedvehicleunderfireconditionsbasedonamodifiedultrasonicobstacleavoidancetechnology