Cargando…

Understanding science teachers’ implementations of integrated STEM curricular units through a phenomenological multiple case study

BACKGROUND: Current reforms in K-12 STEM education call for integration between science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Such integration of STEM disciplines at the K-12 level offers students an opportunity to experience learning in real-world, multidisciplinary contexts; however, t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dare, Emily A., Ellis, Joshua A., Roehrig, Gillian H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6310395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30631694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0101-z
_version_ 1783383426311651328
author Dare, Emily A.
Ellis, Joshua A.
Roehrig, Gillian H.
author_facet Dare, Emily A.
Ellis, Joshua A.
Roehrig, Gillian H.
author_sort Dare, Emily A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Current reforms in K-12 STEM education call for integration between science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Such integration of STEM disciplines at the K-12 level offers students an opportunity to experience learning in real-world, multidisciplinary contexts; however, there is little reported research about teachers’ experiences in engaging in integrated STEM instruction. The purpose of this phenomenological multiple case study is to understand nine science teachers’ first-time experiences in implementing integrated STEM curricular units in their middle school physical science classrooms. This study draws upon both classroom implementation data and teacher reflective interviews to illustrate different degrees of integrated STEM instruction and to understand teachers’ challenges and successes with these varying approaches. RESULTS: Our results indicate three distinct cases of integration within our sample that represent low, medium, and high degrees of STEM integration throughout curriculum implementations. Interviews with teachers from each case revealed three themes that varied across teachers’ experiences: the nature of integration, choosing between science and engineering, and student engagement and motivation. Teachers in all three cases were challenged to make explicit connections between science, engineering, and mathematics while simultaneously maintaining a motivating and engaging context for their students throughout their instruction. Further, it appears that the degree of STEM integration that occurs in instruction may be related to teachers’ ability to make explicit connections between the disciplines. CONCLUSIONS: The work presented here informs educational researchers, policy makers, and K-12 STEM educators that there are several challenges when it comes to implementing new STEM initiatives in K-12 education. Although this work is limited to middle school physical science teachers’ experiences with first-time STEM instruction, many of the identified themes are not content-specific; therefore, this work may shed light on general struggles that are common to educators who are integrating across content disciplines for the first time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6310395
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63103952019-01-08 Understanding science teachers’ implementations of integrated STEM curricular units through a phenomenological multiple case study Dare, Emily A. Ellis, Joshua A. Roehrig, Gillian H. Int J STEM Educ Research BACKGROUND: Current reforms in K-12 STEM education call for integration between science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Such integration of STEM disciplines at the K-12 level offers students an opportunity to experience learning in real-world, multidisciplinary contexts; however, there is little reported research about teachers’ experiences in engaging in integrated STEM instruction. The purpose of this phenomenological multiple case study is to understand nine science teachers’ first-time experiences in implementing integrated STEM curricular units in their middle school physical science classrooms. This study draws upon both classroom implementation data and teacher reflective interviews to illustrate different degrees of integrated STEM instruction and to understand teachers’ challenges and successes with these varying approaches. RESULTS: Our results indicate three distinct cases of integration within our sample that represent low, medium, and high degrees of STEM integration throughout curriculum implementations. Interviews with teachers from each case revealed three themes that varied across teachers’ experiences: the nature of integration, choosing between science and engineering, and student engagement and motivation. Teachers in all three cases were challenged to make explicit connections between science, engineering, and mathematics while simultaneously maintaining a motivating and engaging context for their students throughout their instruction. Further, it appears that the degree of STEM integration that occurs in instruction may be related to teachers’ ability to make explicit connections between the disciplines. CONCLUSIONS: The work presented here informs educational researchers, policy makers, and K-12 STEM educators that there are several challenges when it comes to implementing new STEM initiatives in K-12 education. Although this work is limited to middle school physical science teachers’ experiences with first-time STEM instruction, many of the identified themes are not content-specific; therefore, this work may shed light on general struggles that are common to educators who are integrating across content disciplines for the first time. Springer International Publishing 2018-02-13 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6310395/ /pubmed/30631694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0101-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Dare, Emily A.
Ellis, Joshua A.
Roehrig, Gillian H.
Understanding science teachers’ implementations of integrated STEM curricular units through a phenomenological multiple case study
title Understanding science teachers’ implementations of integrated STEM curricular units through a phenomenological multiple case study
title_full Understanding science teachers’ implementations of integrated STEM curricular units through a phenomenological multiple case study
title_fullStr Understanding science teachers’ implementations of integrated STEM curricular units through a phenomenological multiple case study
title_full_unstemmed Understanding science teachers’ implementations of integrated STEM curricular units through a phenomenological multiple case study
title_short Understanding science teachers’ implementations of integrated STEM curricular units through a phenomenological multiple case study
title_sort understanding science teachers’ implementations of integrated stem curricular units through a phenomenological multiple case study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6310395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30631694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0101-z
work_keys_str_mv AT dareemilya understandingscienceteachersimplementationsofintegratedstemcurricularunitsthroughaphenomenologicalmultiplecasestudy
AT ellisjoshuaa understandingscienceteachersimplementationsofintegratedstemcurricularunitsthroughaphenomenologicalmultiplecasestudy
AT roehriggillianh understandingscienceteachersimplementationsofintegratedstemcurricularunitsthroughaphenomenologicalmultiplecasestudy