Cargando…

Methylation of p16 (ink4a) promoter is independent of human papillomavirus DNA physical state: a comparison between cervical pre-neoplastic and neoplastic samples

BACKGROUND Epigenetic modifications in host cells, like p16 (ink4a) methylation, have been considered as putative complementary mechanisms for cancer development. Because only a small proportion of infected women develop cervical cancer, other factors might be involved in carcinogenesis, either inde...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carestiato, Fernanda Nahoum, Amaro-Filho, Sergio Menezes, Moreira, Miguel Angelo Martins, Cavalcanti, Silvia Maria Baeta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Ministério da Saúde 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6319029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30569945
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0074-02760180456
_version_ 1783384996887658496
author Carestiato, Fernanda Nahoum
Amaro-Filho, Sergio Menezes
Moreira, Miguel Angelo Martins
Cavalcanti, Silvia Maria Baeta
author_facet Carestiato, Fernanda Nahoum
Amaro-Filho, Sergio Menezes
Moreira, Miguel Angelo Martins
Cavalcanti, Silvia Maria Baeta
author_sort Carestiato, Fernanda Nahoum
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND Epigenetic modifications in host cells, like p16 (ink4a) methylation, have been considered as putative complementary mechanisms for cancer development. Because only a small proportion of infected women develop cervical cancer, other factors might be involved in carcinogenesis, either independently or in association with high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infections, including epigenetic factors. OBJECTIVES We hypothesised that p16 (ink4a) methylation might have a role in cancer development driven by HPV16, mainly in the presence of intact E1/E2 genes. Thus, our objectives were to assess the status of p16 (ink4a) methylation and the HPV16 E1/E2 integrity in samples in different stages of cervical diseases. METHODS Presence of HPV16 was determined by E6 type-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Methylation status of the p16 (ink4a) promoter was assessed by methylation-specific PCR in 87 cervical specimens comprising 29 low-grade (LSIL), 41 high-grade (HSIL) lesions, and 17 cervical cancers (CC). Characterisation of E1 and E2 disruption (as an indirect indicator of the presence of episomal viral DNA) was performed by PCR amplifications. FINDINGS We observed a significantly increased trend (nptrend = 0.0320) in the proportion of methylated p16 (ink4a) in cervical samples during cancer development. Concomitant E1 and E2 disruptions were the most frequent pattern found in all groups: CC (76%), HSIL (54%), and LSIL (73%). No statistically significant differences between p16 (ink4a) methylation and E1/E2 integrity, in histological groups, was observed. MAIN CONCLUSIONS There was an increase in methylation of the p16 (ink4a) promoter from pre-neoplastic lesions to cancer. Additionally, a high frequency of E1/E2 disruptions in LSIL/HSIL suggested that viral DNA integration was an early event in cervical disease. Moreover, the methylation status was apparently independent of HPV16 integrity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6319029
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Ministério da Saúde
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63190292019-01-11 Methylation of p16 (ink4a) promoter is independent of human papillomavirus DNA physical state: a comparison between cervical pre-neoplastic and neoplastic samples Carestiato, Fernanda Nahoum Amaro-Filho, Sergio Menezes Moreira, Miguel Angelo Martins Cavalcanti, Silvia Maria Baeta Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz Original Article BACKGROUND Epigenetic modifications in host cells, like p16 (ink4a) methylation, have been considered as putative complementary mechanisms for cancer development. Because only a small proportion of infected women develop cervical cancer, other factors might be involved in carcinogenesis, either independently or in association with high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infections, including epigenetic factors. OBJECTIVES We hypothesised that p16 (ink4a) methylation might have a role in cancer development driven by HPV16, mainly in the presence of intact E1/E2 genes. Thus, our objectives were to assess the status of p16 (ink4a) methylation and the HPV16 E1/E2 integrity in samples in different stages of cervical diseases. METHODS Presence of HPV16 was determined by E6 type-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Methylation status of the p16 (ink4a) promoter was assessed by methylation-specific PCR in 87 cervical specimens comprising 29 low-grade (LSIL), 41 high-grade (HSIL) lesions, and 17 cervical cancers (CC). Characterisation of E1 and E2 disruption (as an indirect indicator of the presence of episomal viral DNA) was performed by PCR amplifications. FINDINGS We observed a significantly increased trend (nptrend = 0.0320) in the proportion of methylated p16 (ink4a) in cervical samples during cancer development. Concomitant E1 and E2 disruptions were the most frequent pattern found in all groups: CC (76%), HSIL (54%), and LSIL (73%). No statistically significant differences between p16 (ink4a) methylation and E1/E2 integrity, in histological groups, was observed. MAIN CONCLUSIONS There was an increase in methylation of the p16 (ink4a) promoter from pre-neoplastic lesions to cancer. Additionally, a high frequency of E1/E2 disruptions in LSIL/HSIL suggested that viral DNA integration was an early event in cervical disease. Moreover, the methylation status was apparently independent of HPV16 integrity. Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Ministério da Saúde 2018-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6319029/ /pubmed/30569945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0074-02760180456 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
spellingShingle Original Article
Carestiato, Fernanda Nahoum
Amaro-Filho, Sergio Menezes
Moreira, Miguel Angelo Martins
Cavalcanti, Silvia Maria Baeta
Methylation of p16 (ink4a) promoter is independent of human papillomavirus DNA physical state: a comparison between cervical pre-neoplastic and neoplastic samples
title Methylation of p16 (ink4a) promoter is independent of human papillomavirus DNA physical state: a comparison between cervical pre-neoplastic and neoplastic samples
title_full Methylation of p16 (ink4a) promoter is independent of human papillomavirus DNA physical state: a comparison between cervical pre-neoplastic and neoplastic samples
title_fullStr Methylation of p16 (ink4a) promoter is independent of human papillomavirus DNA physical state: a comparison between cervical pre-neoplastic and neoplastic samples
title_full_unstemmed Methylation of p16 (ink4a) promoter is independent of human papillomavirus DNA physical state: a comparison between cervical pre-neoplastic and neoplastic samples
title_short Methylation of p16 (ink4a) promoter is independent of human papillomavirus DNA physical state: a comparison between cervical pre-neoplastic and neoplastic samples
title_sort methylation of p16 (ink4a) promoter is independent of human papillomavirus dna physical state: a comparison between cervical pre-neoplastic and neoplastic samples
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6319029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30569945
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0074-02760180456
work_keys_str_mv AT carestiatofernandanahoum methylationofp16ink4apromoterisindependentofhumanpapillomavirusdnaphysicalstateacomparisonbetweencervicalpreneoplasticandneoplasticsamples
AT amarofilhosergiomenezes methylationofp16ink4apromoterisindependentofhumanpapillomavirusdnaphysicalstateacomparisonbetweencervicalpreneoplasticandneoplasticsamples
AT moreiramiguelangelomartins methylationofp16ink4apromoterisindependentofhumanpapillomavirusdnaphysicalstateacomparisonbetweencervicalpreneoplasticandneoplasticsamples
AT cavalcantisilviamariabaeta methylationofp16ink4apromoterisindependentofhumanpapillomavirusdnaphysicalstateacomparisonbetweencervicalpreneoplasticandneoplasticsamples