Cargando…

Estimating the relative cost of track damage mechanisms: combining economic and engineering approaches

This paper proposes a new, two-stage methodology to estimate the relative marginal cost of different types of vehicles running on the rail infrastructure. This information is important particularly where the infrastructure managers wish to differentiate the track access charges by vehicle type for t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Andrew, Iwnicki, Simon, Kaushal, Aniruddha, Odolinski, Kristofer, Wheat, Phill
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6319525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30662164
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0954409717698850
_version_ 1783385078203678720
author Smith, Andrew
Iwnicki, Simon
Kaushal, Aniruddha
Odolinski, Kristofer
Wheat, Phill
author_facet Smith, Andrew
Iwnicki, Simon
Kaushal, Aniruddha
Odolinski, Kristofer
Wheat, Phill
author_sort Smith, Andrew
collection PubMed
description This paper proposes a new, two-stage methodology to estimate the relative marginal cost of different types of vehicles running on the rail infrastructure. This information is important particularly where the infrastructure managers wish to differentiate the track access charges by vehicle type for the purpose of incentivizing the development and use of more track-friendly vehicles. EU legislation requires that the European infrastructure managers set the access charges based on the incremental (marginal) cost of the running trains on their networks. The novelty of the approach derives from the combination of: (1) engineering simulation methods that estimate the track damage caused by the rail vehicles; and (2) econometric methods that estimate the relationship between the actual maintenance costs and the different damage mechanisms. This two-stage approach fills an important gap in the literature, given the limitations of the existing “single-stage” engineering or econometric approaches in obtaining the relative marginal costs for different types of damage. The authors demonstrate the feasibility of the method using 45 track sections from Sweden, for which the data on maintenance costs are available together with relevant track and vehicle data for 2012 (supplied by the Swedish Transport Administration). The authors demonstrate the feasibility of producing summary, section-level damage measures for the three damage mechanisms (wear, rolling contact fatigue, and track settlement), which can be taken forward to the second stage. The econometric results of the second stage indicate that it is possible to obtain sensible relationships between cost and the different damage types, and thus produce relative marginal costs by the damage mechanism and in turn the vehicle type. Based on this feasibility study, tracksettlement has been found to be the most expensive (in terms of maintenance cost) of the three mechanisms, followed by the rolling contact fatigue and then the wear. Future applications should focus on larger datasets in order to produce the required degree of precision on the estimation of the marginal cost.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6319525
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63195252019-01-16 Estimating the relative cost of track damage mechanisms: combining economic and engineering approaches Smith, Andrew Iwnicki, Simon Kaushal, Aniruddha Odolinski, Kristofer Wheat, Phill Proc Inst Mech Eng F J Rail Rapid Transit Stephenson Conference Special Issue This paper proposes a new, two-stage methodology to estimate the relative marginal cost of different types of vehicles running on the rail infrastructure. This information is important particularly where the infrastructure managers wish to differentiate the track access charges by vehicle type for the purpose of incentivizing the development and use of more track-friendly vehicles. EU legislation requires that the European infrastructure managers set the access charges based on the incremental (marginal) cost of the running trains on their networks. The novelty of the approach derives from the combination of: (1) engineering simulation methods that estimate the track damage caused by the rail vehicles; and (2) econometric methods that estimate the relationship between the actual maintenance costs and the different damage mechanisms. This two-stage approach fills an important gap in the literature, given the limitations of the existing “single-stage” engineering or econometric approaches in obtaining the relative marginal costs for different types of damage. The authors demonstrate the feasibility of the method using 45 track sections from Sweden, for which the data on maintenance costs are available together with relevant track and vehicle data for 2012 (supplied by the Swedish Transport Administration). The authors demonstrate the feasibility of producing summary, section-level damage measures for the three damage mechanisms (wear, rolling contact fatigue, and track settlement), which can be taken forward to the second stage. The econometric results of the second stage indicate that it is possible to obtain sensible relationships between cost and the different damage types, and thus produce relative marginal costs by the damage mechanism and in turn the vehicle type. Based on this feasibility study, tracksettlement has been found to be the most expensive (in terms of maintenance cost) of the three mechanisms, followed by the rolling contact fatigue and then the wear. Future applications should focus on larger datasets in order to produce the required degree of precision on the estimation of the marginal cost. SAGE Publications 2017-05-09 2017-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6319525/ /pubmed/30662164 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0954409717698850 Text en © IMechE 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Stephenson Conference Special Issue
Smith, Andrew
Iwnicki, Simon
Kaushal, Aniruddha
Odolinski, Kristofer
Wheat, Phill
Estimating the relative cost of track damage mechanisms: combining economic and engineering approaches
title Estimating the relative cost of track damage mechanisms: combining economic and engineering approaches
title_full Estimating the relative cost of track damage mechanisms: combining economic and engineering approaches
title_fullStr Estimating the relative cost of track damage mechanisms: combining economic and engineering approaches
title_full_unstemmed Estimating the relative cost of track damage mechanisms: combining economic and engineering approaches
title_short Estimating the relative cost of track damage mechanisms: combining economic and engineering approaches
title_sort estimating the relative cost of track damage mechanisms: combining economic and engineering approaches
topic Stephenson Conference Special Issue
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6319525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30662164
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0954409717698850
work_keys_str_mv AT smithandrew estimatingtherelativecostoftrackdamagemechanismscombiningeconomicandengineeringapproaches
AT iwnickisimon estimatingtherelativecostoftrackdamagemechanismscombiningeconomicandengineeringapproaches
AT kaushalaniruddha estimatingtherelativecostoftrackdamagemechanismscombiningeconomicandengineeringapproaches
AT odolinskikristofer estimatingtherelativecostoftrackdamagemechanismscombiningeconomicandengineeringapproaches
AT wheatphill estimatingtherelativecostoftrackdamagemechanismscombiningeconomicandengineeringapproaches