Cargando…
Activities and specificities of CRISPR/Cas9 and Cas12a nucleases for targeted mutagenesis in maize
CRISPR/Cas9 and Cas12a (Cpf1) nucleases are two of the most powerful genome editing tools in plants. In this work, we compared their activities by targeting maize glossy2 gene coding region that has overlapping sequences recognized by both nucleases. We introduced constructs carrying SpCas9‐guide RN...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6320322/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29972722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12982 |
_version_ | 1783385202543820800 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Keunsub Zhang, Yingxiao Kleinstiver, Benjamin P. Guo, Jimmy A. Aryee, Martin J. Miller, Jonah Malzahn, Aimee Zarecor, Scott Lawrence‐Dill, Carolyn J. Joung, J. Keith Qi, Yiping Wang, Kan |
author_facet | Lee, Keunsub Zhang, Yingxiao Kleinstiver, Benjamin P. Guo, Jimmy A. Aryee, Martin J. Miller, Jonah Malzahn, Aimee Zarecor, Scott Lawrence‐Dill, Carolyn J. Joung, J. Keith Qi, Yiping Wang, Kan |
author_sort | Lee, Keunsub |
collection | PubMed |
description | CRISPR/Cas9 and Cas12a (Cpf1) nucleases are two of the most powerful genome editing tools in plants. In this work, we compared their activities by targeting maize glossy2 gene coding region that has overlapping sequences recognized by both nucleases. We introduced constructs carrying SpCas9‐guide RNA (gRNA) and LbCas12a‐CRISPR RNA (crRNA) into maize inbred B104 embryos using Agrobacterium‐mediated transformation. On‐target mutation analysis showed that 90%–100% of the Cas9‐edited T0 plants carried indel mutations and 63%–77% of them were homozygous or biallelic mutants. In contrast, 0%–60% of Cas12a‐edited T0 plants had on‐target mutations. We then conducted CIRCLE‐seq analysis to identify genome‐wide potential off‐target sites for Cas9. A total of 18 and 67 potential off‐targets were identified for the two gRNAs, respectively, with an average of five mismatches compared to the target sites. Sequencing analysis of a selected subset of the off‐target sites revealed no detectable level of mutations in the T1 plants, which constitutively express Cas9 nuclease and gRNAs. In conclusion, our results suggest that the CRISPR/Cas9 system used in this study is highly efficient and specific for genome editing in maize, while CRISPR/Cas12a needs further optimization for improved editing efficiency. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6320322 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63203222019-01-23 Activities and specificities of CRISPR/Cas9 and Cas12a nucleases for targeted mutagenesis in maize Lee, Keunsub Zhang, Yingxiao Kleinstiver, Benjamin P. Guo, Jimmy A. Aryee, Martin J. Miller, Jonah Malzahn, Aimee Zarecor, Scott Lawrence‐Dill, Carolyn J. Joung, J. Keith Qi, Yiping Wang, Kan Plant Biotechnol J Research Articles CRISPR/Cas9 and Cas12a (Cpf1) nucleases are two of the most powerful genome editing tools in plants. In this work, we compared their activities by targeting maize glossy2 gene coding region that has overlapping sequences recognized by both nucleases. We introduced constructs carrying SpCas9‐guide RNA (gRNA) and LbCas12a‐CRISPR RNA (crRNA) into maize inbred B104 embryos using Agrobacterium‐mediated transformation. On‐target mutation analysis showed that 90%–100% of the Cas9‐edited T0 plants carried indel mutations and 63%–77% of them were homozygous or biallelic mutants. In contrast, 0%–60% of Cas12a‐edited T0 plants had on‐target mutations. We then conducted CIRCLE‐seq analysis to identify genome‐wide potential off‐target sites for Cas9. A total of 18 and 67 potential off‐targets were identified for the two gRNAs, respectively, with an average of five mismatches compared to the target sites. Sequencing analysis of a selected subset of the off‐target sites revealed no detectable level of mutations in the T1 plants, which constitutively express Cas9 nuclease and gRNAs. In conclusion, our results suggest that the CRISPR/Cas9 system used in this study is highly efficient and specific for genome editing in maize, while CRISPR/Cas12a needs further optimization for improved editing efficiency. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-07-22 2019-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6320322/ /pubmed/29972722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12982 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Plant Biotechnology Journal published by Society for Experimental Biology and The Association of Applied Biologists and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Lee, Keunsub Zhang, Yingxiao Kleinstiver, Benjamin P. Guo, Jimmy A. Aryee, Martin J. Miller, Jonah Malzahn, Aimee Zarecor, Scott Lawrence‐Dill, Carolyn J. Joung, J. Keith Qi, Yiping Wang, Kan Activities and specificities of CRISPR/Cas9 and Cas12a nucleases for targeted mutagenesis in maize |
title | Activities and specificities of CRISPR/Cas9 and Cas12a nucleases for targeted mutagenesis in maize |
title_full | Activities and specificities of CRISPR/Cas9 and Cas12a nucleases for targeted mutagenesis in maize |
title_fullStr | Activities and specificities of CRISPR/Cas9 and Cas12a nucleases for targeted mutagenesis in maize |
title_full_unstemmed | Activities and specificities of CRISPR/Cas9 and Cas12a nucleases for targeted mutagenesis in maize |
title_short | Activities and specificities of CRISPR/Cas9 and Cas12a nucleases for targeted mutagenesis in maize |
title_sort | activities and specificities of crispr/cas9 and cas12a nucleases for targeted mutagenesis in maize |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6320322/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29972722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12982 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leekeunsub activitiesandspecificitiesofcrisprcas9andcas12anucleasesfortargetedmutagenesisinmaize AT zhangyingxiao activitiesandspecificitiesofcrisprcas9andcas12anucleasesfortargetedmutagenesisinmaize AT kleinstiverbenjaminp activitiesandspecificitiesofcrisprcas9andcas12anucleasesfortargetedmutagenesisinmaize AT guojimmya activitiesandspecificitiesofcrisprcas9andcas12anucleasesfortargetedmutagenesisinmaize AT aryeemartinj activitiesandspecificitiesofcrisprcas9andcas12anucleasesfortargetedmutagenesisinmaize AT millerjonah activitiesandspecificitiesofcrisprcas9andcas12anucleasesfortargetedmutagenesisinmaize AT malzahnaimee activitiesandspecificitiesofcrisprcas9andcas12anucleasesfortargetedmutagenesisinmaize AT zarecorscott activitiesandspecificitiesofcrisprcas9andcas12anucleasesfortargetedmutagenesisinmaize AT lawrencedillcarolynj activitiesandspecificitiesofcrisprcas9andcas12anucleasesfortargetedmutagenesisinmaize AT joungjkeith activitiesandspecificitiesofcrisprcas9andcas12anucleasesfortargetedmutagenesisinmaize AT qiyiping activitiesandspecificitiesofcrisprcas9andcas12anucleasesfortargetedmutagenesisinmaize AT wangkan activitiesandspecificitiesofcrisprcas9andcas12anucleasesfortargetedmutagenesisinmaize |